all 10 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The purpose of higher education is learning, job training, job certification, job networking and recruitment into a higher social class or elite society. It doesn't make you smarter, but it can improve your ability to learn and discipline by keeping a schedule, time management and balancing difficult curriculum with a social life and/or part time job.

The irony is that most people forget the vast majority of knowledge they have learned in college. It makes you wonder if the job should come first or college and job recruitment should be more tightly integrated together. It seems unfair to spend years in college to learn that almost everything you learned was useless at the job that your degree is for. Almost everyone at high IQ professions are looking through reference books and not talmudic scholars that can recall every piece of knowledge in college. Also, many general practitioners are just glorified google search engines. A mid wit without college education could do that job.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The leftish presupposition is that all people are equally able to be intelligent if trained/educated properly. Or at least, all races are equally capable. Therefore we must equalize or attempt to equalize educational attainment between groups

Leftists dislike IQ tests because they suggest that people can be classified as superior/inferior to others. This causes them emotional anguish due to their oversocialization and low self-esteem. They dismiss IQ tests as illegitimate because they are morally repugnant, not because they have a good rational reason for doing it (but theyll try to make up reasons to pretend their rationale isn't just emotive)

18 ...More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What is this from? Is this uncle Ted?

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uncle Ted had a crystal ball.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The leftish presupposition is that all people are equally able to be intelligent if trained/educated properly. Or at least, all races are equally capable. Therefore we must equalize or attempt to equalize educational attainment between groups

Their example would only make sense... if they could show a single school where everyone scored well.

But as I explained to another user earlier today, we have data from the 1990s that shows even the Richest Blacks still did worse in school than the poorest Whites & Asians.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/1995-SAT-vs-Income-Education.png

So it comes down to a point of insanity when someone says "we're all the same" but absolutely no data even supports it.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their example would only make sense..

To try and make sense of leftism is to fundamentally misunderstand it. It's like religion or psychological coping mechanism, it doesn't require consistency

Read Ted, at least 6-32. Don't want to fill up the comments section with a wall of text

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's one more point I want to add.

There's another hidden danger to the denial of intelligence. Charles Murray dedicated his entire life research into pointing out that a dull population will demand more welfare from the government.

So the irony of asking for "better funded schools" is completely lost for naysayers. A smart & intelligent population will never ask for Billions in free handouts. They're smart enough to look after themselves and pursue their own lifegoals.

By treating smart people & dumb people as the exact same, it results in a dysgenic society. Dumb people will pop out more kids at a higher rate than smart people. The dumb kids will now go to school and fail all their classes. When that happens, they will either take on the shittiest jobs that pay minimum wage, join a life of crime, or live their life on welfare while popping out more dumb kids for the cycle to continue.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The dysgenics implication has been known for awhile.. Richard Lynn has a whole book on it and Last recently published something on that too

Basically all evidence shows the entire "liberal" multiracial utopian project is going to end in disaster

[–]Booky 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The only purpose of schools & degrees is to find a good well paid job