all 18 comments

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Its best to get out of cities for biological purposes. Cities are behavioral sinks. They crush fertility, raise depression, loneliness and atomize people.

Urbanization is the number one contributor to declining birth rates. Russia was the least urban country in Europe in the 19th century and it had the largest birth rate in the world with 7 kids per woman. Then Stalin industrialized it in the 30s and like clockwork their fertility plummeted.

Its the same with the US. The more it urbanized, the more birth rates declined. Ben Franklin noted all the way back in the 1780s that people in the cities did not reproduce themselves. Hitler made the same observations in the 1920s. Historians throughout the millennia have noted how the cities drain the rural areas of its most brilliant people and shove them into a life of sterility.

Look South Korea, China and Japan. Half of South Korea's population lives in the Seoul megacity and consequently their national birth rate is .92 kids per woman! In Tokyo the TFR is 1.13, in Chinese megacities like Shangai, Beijing and Guangzhou, the TFRs are below 1. In Shanghai its probably below .9!

Urban living is soul crushing, the congestion, the unnatural environment, the crushing work hours, the feeling of being surrounded by strangers...it all lead to deep alienation and depression.

Humans simply did not evolve to live like this and it gnaws away at people's sanity.

People should leave the cities as much as they can and go rural. America is blessed with vast lands and the people ther have the luxury to flee to the countryside. In small towns or villages, you know everyone around you, you know your neighbors and you have time fraternize with them.

It would allow for more organizing and unified action. In cities people are simply pigeonholed into lonely apartments and no one knows or trusts one another.

TL;DR

Ruralization would allow whites to increase their birth rates and enable greater organizing.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is no such thing as a civilization that is purely rural. Cities are the source of every great civilization.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, but they can be minimized. The German model was good. They had small industrial towns often dedicated to one factory. Plus German development was such that lead to a number of medium sized cities rather than one huge metropolis like London.

Today due to the blessings of technology, cities can be downsized even further. Telerobotics and online work eliminates the need to stay in cities for a lot of people. It also saves companies a lot of office rent. Plus, bullet trains could be built that connect villages to a city. You go to the city at dawn and return to the village at dusk.

Japan has a bullet train that can travel at 320 km/hr. The tech is there, it needs a willing government to do it.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I understand where you're coming from, but I believe the birth rate issue is much more complex than that.

60 years ago, a single man could have worked a low skill job, but still make enough to provide for his family, own a house and a car.

But because of mass immigration and Feminism, Women now joined the workforce and immigrants brought the value of labor down. The cost of living basically priced out the idea of anyone having large families because it's now seen as a burden rather than a positive.

Whites leaving the cities for these suburbs and rural areas doesn't actually fix this issue. It's been the opposite. They've been moving to these small towns and buying up all the local houses. But this lead to a surge in demand and bidding wars that the non-city people could never compete against.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/housing-bubble-small-towns-1.5973134

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The point of feminism is spot on. Its probably the second leading cause behind birth rate collapse after urbanization.

As far small town people being priced out...new villages and towns will be founded. Half the people of NYC can't cram into a dozen villages. Over time it will lead to a more dispersed and less urban population.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Save yourself and you have a chance to rebuild. Sacrifice yourself and your family in a city and it's game over.

Blackpill inbound. We're way past reversing any of this. The only way out is through.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Save yourself and you have a chance to rebuild. Sacrifice yourself and your family in a city and it's game over.

Surviving in a city isn't that hard. Hell, if you do happen to be rich (i.e make more than $100k per year), you get to live like a Kang here.

The real hardships is turning on the news and constantly seeing "racism" make the headlines. But if more Whites actually came back to these places they built, it would do more good in the long term vs bad.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You should listen to the most recent Strike and Mike, 167 I think 'CRT Gig Economy' or something. The points they brought up about not white flighting were spot on.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Striker has the worst takes. Support the lockdowns, take the vaccine and vote for Jeremy corbyn. He's just a racist communist.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

dont listen to him then, i dont care who you do or dont like

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't. I'm saying it for other people to be wary of those people.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you don't need to worry about that, the people here are all already sub 100iq schizos and racist libtards

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

New cities will be built. We built Egypt, Peru, Italy, Greece, "Chinese" Pyramids, Byzantine, etc.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Old monuments can never be rebuilt. If someone blows up the Pyramids, they're gone forever.

Same with the Sistine Chapel or Notre Dame.

It's also about the message. Again, all the new immigrants are happy to tear these infrastructure down because it's their way of erasing history and replacing it with themselves. Tomorrow, they might blow up Spaceships but then claim it was actually a Gay Transgendered Muslim who first landed on the moon...

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We will build anew

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

China and Peru? LOL

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Go enjoy getting nogged then