all 13 comments

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your sex positivity clashes with the working class whites you seek to 'free'.

Sex positivity is a rhetorical attack on traditional marriage. It implicitly frames monogamous relationships as 'negative' and backwards. When degenerate hedonic lust is 'positive' natalism becomes negative. This undermines the 'whites' you claim to be so 'concerned' about. This reduces their birthrates and sets them up for a life of misery.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As long as you're pro-white I don't care. In fact I'd work with anyone even honest progressives who definitely aren't pro-white towards common goals. Ultimately whatever niche views people have in this movement is largely irrelevant. I'm friends with and talk to atheists, pagans and just about every other type of person.

It's a big tent movement, borther.

(PS you'll probably get a lot of push back on the sex positivity stuff if you espouse it here -- including from myself -- but hey we can't all agree on everything.)

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Stop larping and return to Christ

[–]jykylsin2034 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Were the Romans larping? How about the Greeks? What about Goths, Saxons, Vikings, and the Aryan ancestors of all of them? Christianity is a blight and a foreign jewish desert religion that violently supplanted our own.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Christianity is a blight and a foreign jewish desert religion that violently supplanted our own.

Nice of you to spread jewish lies.
If Christianity is a "jewish desert religion" then why did Jesus call jews "children of the devil"? If Christianity is a jewish religion, why did the founders of the Catholic church call jews "father killers" and worse. If Christianity is a jewish religion, why did the founder of the protestant church call Jews the worst names, advocating expulsion of jews?

Romans were Christians. Vikings were Christians. Goths were Christians. Saxons were Christians, it is literally in their fucking name: Sons of Isaac - Saac Son. LOL

You drank the jewish anti christianity propaganda. Time to learn your own roots and who you enemy is.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Worse. They were worshiping false gods. If Christianity was a Jewish religion, Jews wouldn't have killed our Lord.

Catholicism is the only true counter-revolutionary left. Every white living in pre-enlightment era thinking are Catholics. Sure there are many, many snakes in this faith, but they are being driven out as we speak. The young semenarians are living and preaching hardcore traditionalism. Great things are happening and you are outside. The only path to salvation from this neoliberal hellhole is a return to Rome.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The enlightenment wouldn't have happened if pre-Enlightenment thinking was effective at combating it, the industrial revolution happened and the world needed to reorganise no amount of stomping your feet and trying to fit a square into a circle hole will change that. The only effective anti-venom to liberalism/finance/capitalism/jewry has been 20th century revolutionary nationalisms.

Also, the Catholic church is just another institution of international finance in our material reality so it doesn't really matter about the doctrine. The Catholic church wasn't really supportive of either Germany or Italy in the early 20th century, the only 2 states that ever combated usury and sought to bring transcendence to the people's lives. Why was that? Why did the Orthodox Church similarly shun the deeply Orthodox and Christlike Legionaries? Churches follow money power not doctrine, these 3 groups were the only serious fighters against usury and other things Christianity is supposed to be most opposed to yet they would rather ally with capitalists. If back then, before Nostra Aetate and the pozzification of the Catholic church, it was impossible to get them to live up to their doctrine and try to rid Europe of usury and sin what makes you think they'll ever be on our side today?

The reality is that no religious institution is ever going to even passively support the liberation of our race from usury and literal genocide let alone actively aid us. It makes absolutely no difference which one you choose to follow from the perspective of saving our race. I would just tell people to not give them your money and volunteering time, they will just direct it to sexual deviants and racial strangers. Instead if you're going to volunteer or give charity, do it like the jews do: help your racial community.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Every white living in pre-enlightment era thinking are Catholics."

Have you never heard of the other Christian churches that were wiped out over the past thousand years?

"If Christianity was a Jewish religion, Jews wouldn't have killed our Lord."

Infallible logic here.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm talking about right now.

My point is that Catholicism is the last living philosophy of pre-Enlightment era thinking (aka. Traditionalism). All other White philosophies and religions are liberal or dead.

Can you please explain how Christianity is Jewish? Jews hated Christ so much they killed him. How does Christianity serve Jews? Zionism? I've already mentioned that Catholicism perfects the flaws of Evangelical thinking and this eliminates their philosemitism, so that argument is nil

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's also not true. Taoism is alive and well, and many other ancient religions and philosophies. A few European ones have made a comeback, but nothing super old.

Christianity is for Hebrews. I am not so much of a fool to believe the Bible when it tries to make the 12 tribes sound all different. They all fell to evil, they all spread across the world to infiltrate other places. I never said it was Jewish, but is is Hebrew, and to me, that's just as damning.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just be a real national socialist instead of an anti-social ironybro

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

anarchistic and sex-positive version of National Bolshevism

I'm not familiar enough with Limonov to really know what you're talking about, but I'd say that it is sometimes useful to have a state apparatus to facilitate mass-scale coordinated action, so I'm suspicious of anarchism. I approve of "sex-positivity" in the sense that sex is a natural part of life that the people doing it can and should undertake deliberately for the benefit of future generations; I disapprove of the "sex is pleasurable and that's all I need to know, woohoo!" sense of "sex-positivity".

I consider that the denial of White identity and oppression of White people in the US and Europe is intimately connected to the class struggle.

I think we're pretty much agreed on this point. To me it's pretty clear that the ruling elite despise whites who are culturally low-class and therefore feels no guilt about e.g. opening up a meatpacking plant in some rural white town and staffing it with cultural and racial aliens from elsewhere. There is evidence that managers are aware that racial diversity lowers the chances of workers unionizing. And I think there's a sense that to be one of the "fashionable" high-society crowd, a white persion must basically say that white people are bad.

favor abolishing the police, but for class reasons rather than "systemic racism"

I'm curious to see your reasoning on this. To me it's pretty much a given that some people will need to experience the stick, rather than the carrot, to follow the law. When those people break the law, someone must go pick them out of the general population so that the stick can be applied. Whoever does that basically is the police, regardless of what they are called. I don't think you could pull off a police-free, majority-black polity and keep any kind of advanced civilization.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You sound like a vargish communist for whites. Fine to me, not religious and not gonna split hairs over trivial economic differences as long as you're pro-white. While we're under ZOG, neither of us get anything, so we're definitely on the same team