Slavs aren't white.

submitted by MisterQ from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes that's the alleged history as taught in universities that also teach CRT. A history taught after the communists slaughtered tens of millions of Whites, outlawed their religion, changed their history, and so on.

Meanwhile alt history tells a different story, although it is skeptical and bizzarre.

In alt history there is no such thing as mongols.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Mongol occupation of Kievan Rus is not some recent historical confabulation. It has been known and accepted for centurys. Who says that it never happened?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do you have a historical source for that? From before Napoleon, preferably.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But you haven't answered the question. Is there someone who seriously questions that part of Russian history? If so, lets here some names.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sharing names. But the reason I ask is because such sources don't exist.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Alt history tells all sorts of things. Religious texts do the same.

It's best to compare all evidence from all perspectives, rather than to latch onto any single view.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm with you on that one.