all 73 comments

[–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 9 fun5 insightful - 8 fun6 insightful - 9 fun -  (15 children)

Modern degenerates get their info from videos. At the very least, anyone interested in Hitler should read Mein Kampf which shows his strengths and weaknesses quite clearly.

The result of Hitler is that Germany lost the war and was taken over by American Jews who turned Germany into a liberal cesspool. Is this a great outcome?

Hitler's weakness was his racism. If he had focused on Germany as a nation and culture, then he could have made an alliance with Zionists and then he would have gotten the atomic bomb first and won the war.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Modern degenerates get their info from videos

There's plenty to read here my semite friend.

anyone interested in Hitler should read Mein Kampf which shows his strengths and weaknesses quite clearly.

True. I especially liked this section:

https://i.postimg.cc/ZK1MS2Jb/1416343043794.png

Immortalized by Frame Games at the start of this video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/26cJPYd6GjAX/

The result of Hitler is that Germany lost the war

You can't kill an idea Jew.

Jews who turned Germany into a liberal cesspool. Is this a great outcome?

I think we all know the answer to that.

Hitler's weakness was his racism

Everyone accepts racism. Even white liberals. We all explicitly or implicitly understand race and by the current definition of 'racism' that's all 'racism' really is.

If he had focused on Germany as a nation and culture, then he could have made an alliance with Zionists

Hitler technically helped to found zion through the Haavara agreement. If you're /u/jesus you'd call him an evil 'zionist' (but jesus calls everyone a zionist). The reality is that Jews probably do need a homeland, everyone does, but the Israelis decided to put their homeland on top of a country that was clearly occupied. That's not my problem. That's a Jewish problem. I just want Jews to stop fucking up white homelands and stop genociding whites. Is that really too much to ask?

alliance with Zionists

Jews don't make real alliances because their end goal is world domination and enslavement of non jews. How can you seriously say that Hitler could have made a real alliance with Jews? That's ridiculous and you know it.

and then he would have gotten the atomic bomb first and won the war.

This is a very interesting comment. It might be true that zionist would have made an temp alliance and allowed hitler to develop nuclear weapons but they would have eventually subverted Germany the same way the subverted the nuclear United States. Hitler had the right impulse.

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

There's plenty to read here my semite friend.

I actually read the Ford translation, the one you recommended.

Everyone accepts racism. Even white liberals. We all explicitly or implicitly understand race and by the current definition of 'racism' that's all 'racism' really is.

I am using the definition of racism from before the West went insane, meaning an obsession with race. By that definition, modern liberals are racist but religious Muslims are not. And I am not.

Hitler technically helped to found zion through the Haavara agreement.

Yes he started off with the right idea but failed to follow through.

Jews don't make real alliances because their end goal is world domination and enslavement of non jews. How can you seriously say that Hitler could have made a real alliance with Jews?

An alliance isn't a friendship. An alliance is practical cooperation for mutual benefit. At that time Zionists only wanted a homeland which Hitler could have secured in exchange for Zionist support of Germany in the war.

It might be true that zionist would have made an temp alliance and allowed hitler to develop nuclear weapons but they would have eventually subverted Germany the same way the subverted the nuclear United States. Hitler had the right impulse.

Jews (followers of Judaism) simply subvert any nation that is stupid enough to allow them in. So this really has nothing to do with an alliance. Hitler could have made an alliance with Zionists and then expelled all Jews to the Zionist nation. This would have prevented the subversion of Germany. So Hitler had the wrong impulse.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

alliance isn't a friendship. An alliance is practical cooperation for mutual benefit. At that time Zionists only wanted a homeland which Hitler could have secured in exchange for Zionist support of Germany in the war.

He did that half-assed until western Zionists called for German genocide and sterilization. But after 1937 the nazis were entirely opposed to Zionism and during the war funded the Palestinian resistence via Operation Atlas among other campaigns.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do you know that Frame Games is a jew?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I do. So is Ron Unz. So was Bobby Fisher. So is David Cole.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fischer renounced his Jewishness. He was prolifically anti-Jewish in every shape, way and form.

David Cole (stein) letter to JDL (so as to not be assassinated?) :

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EaQ52yrX0AYRhCF?format=jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EaQ53ajWoAEaOqn?format=jpg&name=small

One thing you can say for certain about Cole/Stein is that he is duplicitous.

Robert Stark, Matthew Pegan, and David Cole (aka David Stein, Republican Party Animal) are raising money to produce a documentary on Hutton Gibson now that he is dead.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eacig3VWoAECj4T?format=jpg&name=medium

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eacijt4XQAEkIh8?format=jpg&name=large

Once a flim flam man always a flim flam man. David Cole or Stein, whatever moniker he styles himself, needs to get his lies straight.

Cole,

Hutton’s a very nice man. Screwy as Woody Woodpecker, but nice. I probably won’t release the footage while he’s still alive.”

Stein,

he chose me to shoot a documentary about his beliefs—a film he insisted must only be released after his passing”

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fischer renounced his Jewishness.

Not really possible.

He was prolifically anti-Jewish in every shape, way and form.

This is true. That's why I brought him up.

(so as to not be assassinated?) :

Yup. Those letters read like he's under duress. I think some jewish defense league head had a hit out on him so it's understandable I guess. (shows you how desperate they are to keep up their kayfabe)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eacijt4XQAEkIh8?format=jpg&name=large

Jews truly have no honor. Hutton Gibson is a good man (lived to be 101) and didn't deserve that disrespect from someone he trusted.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"The Nazis were staunch Capitalist Zionists who were funded by Rockefellers and were Jewish communsits (Bjerknes) and part of the technocratic Fascist agenda to ensalve the world..."

That's basically the marxist and Jewish line of gatekeep thinking...

Okay, waht about this:

The Sonderfahndungsliste G.B. or "Special Search List Great Britain" was a secret arrest list for the Gestapo containing high profile individuals and organizations in England who were to be arrested and seized after the invasion and occupation.

The list specifically targeted all Freemasons in the UK, high ranking bankers of the Midland Bank conglomerate (today's HSBC), Chase Manhattan Bank of London, various Royal Family members, British MI6 intelligence agents and World Zionist Organization leaders themselves. Notable Zionist leaders and organizations pegged for arrest and closure included:

  • Sieff, Israel Moses. (President of the English Zionist Organization)

  • Israel Cohen. (secretary of World Zionist Organization)

  • Ze'ev Jabotinsky. (Revisionist Zionist leader) who, mind you, worked w/ Mussolini in his Ethiopian campaign.

  • Selig Brodetsky. (World Zionist Executive and president of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

  • Paul Goodman. (Zionist Organization member and writer of the periodical Zionist Review)

  • Chaim Weizmann. (President of World Zionist Organization)

  • James de Rothschild. (Zionist banker)

  • Nahum Sokolow. (President of World Zionist Organization)

  • The World Zionist Organisation (entire organization targeted for elimination)

  • New Zionist Organisation (entire organization targeted for elimination)

  • Women’s International Zionist Organisation (entire organization targeted for elimination)

  • Jewish Agency for Palestine (entire organization targeted for elimination)

The list also contains numerous pages dedicated to listing the entire Freemason lodge network in England. The Gestapo planned to wipe out Anglo-Freemasonry in its entirety.

In no particular order, the following are various organizations and banks that were listed to be seized and closed by the Gestapo. Note, some of these were American Wall St. financial trust subsidiaries. Evidently, the purpose of the Black Book list was to effectively wipe out the Anglo/Masonic/Jewish power hubs. Addresses included:

  • The Rockefeller Foundation, W. C. 1, RSHA IV E 4.

  • N. M. Rothschild and Sons Bank, E. C. 4, New Court Street, Swithins Lane.

  • Chase National Bank of the City of New York. E. C. 3, Lombard Street 38

  • Guaranty Trust Company of New York, E. C. 3, Lombard Street 32.

  • United Grand Lodge of English Freemasons, W .C.2, Freemasons Hall, Great Queen Street, RSHA VT G 1.

  • Swiss Bank Corporation, E. C. 2, 99 Grasham Street bzrw.

  • Anglo-International Bank Ltd., E. C. 3, Lombard Street 24/28.

  • Lazard Brothers & Co. (same address)

  • Fabian-Society, S. W. 1,11 Dartmouth Street.

The list is full of influential organizations and people to be arrested and shut down. Unfortunately, Operation Sea-Lion (invasion of Britain) never came to be as German forces had to be redirected to the East in response to the massive Red Army buildup along the border.

Had this arrest list been carried out in its entirety, so-called World Jewry would have been dealt a crippling blow that would have likely resulted in an Axis victory.

From: After_Midnight Gab post.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

/u/send_nasty_stuff The atheist Jew (Zionist?) (though how can you be a Jew if you don't practice Judaism) who thinks everyone is subhuman (Talmudic?) and called for their genoicde thinks degenerates get their info from videos. Yes, videos. What if they watch videos and read books?

No... Hitler, though I reject nazism because nazis rejected the Mystical Body of Christ, was indeed racist in the def. of the word but less so than the plutocratic Jews and non-Jews that enslaved African-Americans, but such an 'issue' was NOT the reason he lost the war. It had to do more with the poor military blunders of his soldiers and at times his carelessness of the blitz. It was only when he fired the freemason Schacht and threw him in a concentration camp and replaced him with Walther Funk, a pupil of the left-leaning Nazi Gottfried Feder, did the entire banking cabal set their purses on destroying Germany for good.

Hitler worked with Zionists up to a point. Haavara sent a mere 20,000 Jews, some studies say less, to Palestine. Zionism literal def. is the commercialization of Palestine. Other countires including German Christian Templars tried to colonize Haifa and commercialize in the 19th century but failed miserably. The Basel Zionist congresses founded by Zionist Jews and 900+ corporations set their eyes again on the east-west axis and initially used legal, albeit, immoral means to acquire land for company colonization for exploitation, geopolitical outpost and resources and then funded Jewish supremacist terrorists to accomplish the rest.

The Nazis wanted to send Jews to Chilie, Madagascar, etc., but Zionists wanted Palestine. Consider at this time Jews were already making Aliyah to Israel by the 100's of thousands for religious reasons. Herzl was a Zionist Jew and called Diaspora Jews who refused to acknowledge the establishment of a Jewish majority state, "kikes" and that "an arrow was aimed at their breast."

During the war Hitler funded Palestinians through Operation Atlas. That's right the nazis were on the side of the Palestinians funding them while the British was funding the Irgun and other Jewish groups.

[–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hitler's weakness was his racism. If he had focused on Germany as a nation and culture, then he could have made an alliance with Zionists

He tried to do that. After Hitler came into power in 1933, the Jews launched an international boycott against Germany. This was harmful because the country was still deep in a depression. Hitler was forced to negotiate with the Jews to get them off his back. This resulted in the Havarra agreement. However, the Jews couldn't stick to the terms of the deal, and they kept trying to stab Germany in the back. They were co-ordinating with Jews in Britain and America to bring down the Reich from within, and this forced Hitler to take a hard line against them. The Jews were treated as 5th columnists and were dealt with by progressively harsher means as time went on. Jews used their power to get Britain and America to take hostile stances against Germany, and this eventually led to war.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I said Zionists, not Jews. If you don't understand the difference then of course you can't understand my point.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Hitler's weakness was his racism.

Hitler's weaknesses were a hell of a lot more than just racism. He was incompetent at ruling, ran Germany into the ground, he constantly blamed everyone around him for his fuck-ups, wouldn't listen to anyone who knew more than him, he was a drug addict and a lazy shit who slept in to midday during the middle of a war after keeping his top generals up until 4 or 5am watching American movies.

Germany did as well as it did in spite of Hitler, not because of him.

Just one example:

The Allies established a beachhead on D-Day because Hitler had given strict instructions that the armoured reserves weren't to be moved without his personal approval. When the Allies landed at Normandy, the Germans were caught unawares, but they had reserves ready, so they would be okay... except everyone was too terrified of Hitler's violent tantrums to wake him. He didn't wake up until midday, by which time the Allies has established the beachhead and broken through and the reserves were too little, too late.

He bled the cream of German's youth away, just throwing them into the meat grinder of Stalingrad because Hitler was determined to capture the city named after his hated rival Stalin. Stalingrad had zero strategic value.

He destroyed army after army by refusing to allow them to make strategic retreats to get into a better position to counter-attack. If a booze-added hobo had been in charge of the German army, he probably would have done better than Hitler.

He wasted vast amounts of manpower, time, money and most importantly scarce resources on building "superweapons" that he thought would win the war. They didn't, and they couldn't have.

Hitler was so bad at running Germany that the Allies had a number of opportunities to kill him and refused to do so because they didn't want someone competent to take over.

[–]CircumsteinRabbi Circumstein 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I love tearing ignorant, disingenuous fools apart. The source of the data I'm about to demolish you with comes from Jewish historian Eugen Weber (Varieties Of Fascism, 1964), which makes it all the more amusing.

German unemployment figures (p. 84):

6,000,000+ (1933)

4,000,000 (1935)

2,900,000 (1936)

300,000 (1938)

National revenue (Ibid):

45 billion marks (1932)

61 billion marks (1936)

National production (Ibid):

38 billion marks (1932)

75 billion marks (1938)

Volume of trade rose by 25% between 1935-39 (Ibid)

Percentage of agricultural products imported to, rather than produced in, Germany (p. 85):

30% (1932)

17% (1938)

I can only laugh at this kind of sheer ignorance, which does not even care to provide a source, and which relies on bizarre rumours (drug addict? Let me guess, you also think he was syphilitic, a gay prostitute while in Vienna, and so forth).

Many of these rumours originate from a charlatan by the name of Josef Greiner, who originally wrote a book sycophantically praising Hitler, claiming that he knew him personally. Hitler recognized the work as fraudulent and prevented its publishing. After the war, Greiner then wrote a book doing the exact opposite, painting himself (again falsely) as a heroic anti-Nazi resistance leader who tried to assassinate Hitler. Again, Greiner was widely accepted as a fraud who could not have possibly known Hitler. The syphilitic theory is one of many such lies from Greiner's fraudulent and refuted works.

Your claim elsewhere that the Nazis 'took credit' for supposed economic successes of the Weimar Republic is revealed by these statistics to be pure farce.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

which does not even care to provide a source, and which relies on bizarre rumours (drug addict?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC6zUcZJcDM

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you also think he was syphilitic, a gay prostitute while in Vienna

There's no evidence that Hitler had syphilis. I must admit the gay prostitute story is new to me. Its rather idiotic -- nobody who knew Hitler could have believed it.

a charlatan by the name of Josef Greiner

None of my statements came from Greiner.

Your claim elsewhere that the Nazis 'took credit' for supposed economic successes of the Weimar Republic

The Weimar republic managed to get through the period 1918 to 1924 despite massive war debt, hyperinflation, political instability, the army's hostility, insurrection from traitors like Ernst Röhm, the intransigence of France and Britain, international blockades, war reparations and more. They reformed the currency, brought inflation under control, kick-started the economy, increased jobs and trade, and presided through the Golden Twenties that ended only with the global Great Depression that affected pretty much everyone.

By 1929, Germany had five years of uninterrupted economic growth and rising incomes thanks to the Weimar republic. The economy was solid, and German's international reputation was much improved -- no thanks to the conservatives who tried to withdraw from the the Paris Peace pact. Even France had softened their attitude and reparations had been massively reduced. Germany was welcomed into the League of Nations and was no longer a pariah.

And then the Great Depression hit in 1929, which fucked it up for everyone, not just Germany. Weimar is no more to blame for the Great Depression than Iceland. But by 1932, the economy was recovering and unemployment was falling. Between August 1932 and 1933, unemployment fell by 1.1 million, and employment increased by 1.3 million. The economy was already improving before the conservative idiots handed power to Hitler, thinking that he would be their puppet.

The Weimar republic planned and funded the Autobahn system, with the first such highway opened to the public in 1932, the Bundesautobahn 555 (although not known by that name at the time). Hitler loved the Autobahns, and took credit for the plans which had already had money allocated from the budget, and extended it greatly.

Between 1933 and 1939, the Reich managed to increase government spending by over 23 billion Reichsmark; they had reduced their old (pre-war and Weimar) debt from 4.2 to 3.4 billion Reichsmark, but had taken on new debt of over 27 billion Reichsmark.

Like all governments, Weimar Germany made mistakes. But those mistakes were mild compared to the disastrous effect Hitler's war-mongering had, by 1945 a full quarter of the German workforce was made up of literal slaves, because so many productive German workers were dead, crippled, or in the army. The Nazi economy was a vampire, it was not productive on its own, it could only survive by sucking the life out of others.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Nazis invaded Denmark. Not a cool move, bro.

We had a "dont attack agreement" and it was violated

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They did, but 'invaded' is a little over the top. They occupied it. WWII was about who would control continental Europe and be the defacto world currency and default academic culture. Germany Would have been a better hegemon than the US puppet state and it's Rothschild masters. Ironically Europe and the rest of the world would have been a more diverse and healthy place had the national socialists won.

Germany would have most likely withdrawn from Denmark, Poland and most other places in Europe after the war. They would not have been permanent occupiers. Germany would have probably protected the individual ethnic expression of Denmark, the UK and other parts of Europe. If you dig deeper you'll see that Hitler was even toning down his anti slavic rhetoric in the late 30's as he knew that the slavic people would become part of the future German peoples community over time (in a good way not a cleansing way as it's described by bad faith anti white academics).

edit. anybody that thinks hitler hated slavs should read this. He hated communism. He hated that the slavic people had not resisted communism more successfully.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

First they invaded Denmark, then they occupied it, then they suppressed the danish people.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It was a world war. The entire world was a front.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Use odyssey not bitchute - https://odysee.com/@modernpolitics

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Bitchute... owned by Ziocuck. Odysee owned by two Jews.

[–]Richard_Parker 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Give it a rest....

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Where to go? Newtube? Dtube? Brandnewtube? Jesus HELP ME MAN.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Check who owns them. Easy. I wouldn't touch dtube.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know, but given my current state of being almost never able to concentrate to any degree, and awake only a few hours a day, much less actually functional, it's nearly impossible to do this. I'll start a search and fall asleep in the middle of what I'm doing, and then when I wake up, I'll probably be confused enough to think I'm fine.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All I can say is if Mexico took California, Texas and New Mexico I think United States is justified in going to war with Mexico to reclaim lost territories. Germany was humiliated by their defeat in WW I and the war was to reclaim back their territories and fight communism. In hindsight we can say the war was a terrible idea because they lost more territory and was the worst war in recent European history. Everything else that has has lead to the current state of the west is because of Jewish influence. They probably still push for mass immigration even if the holocaust didn't happen.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They probably still push for mass immigration even if the holocaust didn't happen.

Undoubtedly true. There's some great articles over at Occidental Observer by Andrew Joyce about the infuence of Jews in pushing a type of prototype of multiculturalism in the form of cultural pluralism back in 19th century Germany. By no means can it be said that all these harmful efforts by Jews are merely the result of some deep neurosis embedded within the Jewish nation after the Holocaust -- though I think it obviously excacerbated it.

[–]mongre 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Hitler pulled so many dick moves it's difficult to count and verify. The fact remains, anyone seeking to control others via dictatorship sucks and should be defeated and despised. Argue numbers but the dude literally murdered people as a matter of policy. Fuck that.

Put plainly, we value freedom of everyone to life their lives as long as they don't hurt others. If you feel otherwise, luch meinen schvantz.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The fact remains, anyone seeking to control others via dictatorship

Please tell us your ideal political system and political philosophy. You sound like an ancap.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ancaps are all for mammon.

[–]nordmannenLegionnaire 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lolbertarian detected

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thr state must be small so private businesses can do as they please. The state = US corporation for the regulation of common good. Get rid of it and you have left the golden calf of mammon ten fold.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Hitler wanted to fight communism. He lost, and look where we are today, communism on the rise EVERYWHERE. Plans for UBI? What's that? Yep, even in 'murica.

[–]sylla94 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

this it's da commies boomer shit needs to stop. yes, communism is evil, yes, Hitler fought it. but no, it's been dead for a long time now and isn't remotely close to becoming relevant. the true economic evil is this capitalistic soul sucking machine that consumes anything of social value in order to perpetuate itself while destroying the lives of the masses and consolidating power among the elites https://youtu.be/lGM4hCFXNE4

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Whoa, wait a minute. Communism is a WEAPON used by the JEWS to destroy nations and people's living.

Capitalism isn't much better, unless it's in a direct democracy, which then leads to a STABLE version of what most people would call "democratic socialism" which is good. Only, examples of direct democracy are few and far between, with the last true version of it having been extinguished in Lybia in 2011 with its "liberation".

You think this favorite weapon of the Jews has become "unfashionable"? You are severely deluded, my friend. The newer generation has no fear of communism. They think it's a good thing.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't argue with the bolsheviks.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the reminder, I forget.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Communism is not dead. It's larping.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

WEF: "You'll have no privacy, own nothing and be happy."

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Plans for UBI? What's that?

Not communism, that's for sure.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

What about Mussolini or Francisco Franco?

Both leaders were Fascists or Fascist adjacent, but their legacy did not actually leave their nations in ruin, or even disrupt the ethnic balance that already existed in Europe.

Even Franco sent his own soldiers to fight the USSR and yet Spain wasn't really punished for this by the end of the war.

[–]nordmannenLegionnaire 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Germany was left in ruin because it was bombed in campaigns organized to completely eradicate cities, like Hamburg, Dresden, and especially Königsberg, which literally doesn't exist anymore. Hitler did not do that, the Soviets and the Allies did. There was also no ethnic balance in Europe otherwise WW2 wouldn't have happened, come on now.

Also, Corneliu Codreanu>Mussolini>Franco

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Codreanu was extremely based. It's unfortunate that he was murdered by the King and replaced by a spineless, traitorous opportunist like Antonescu, he could have made Romania a top-of-the-line nation.

[–]CircumsteinRabbi Circumstein 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Amusingly, fascism was so popular in Romania at the time that even the degenerate playboy King Carol II and those around him were forced to imitate its symbolism. Supposedly the monarchy even used the Romano Saluto and all. It is a classic example of how establishment forces pay lip service to Right-wing values such as tradition, morality and nationalism in order to ward off threats from actual traditionalists, moralists and nationalists. Interestingly, Codreanu actually knew well the academic A. C. Cuza, whose party Codreanu and his close friends help to found before they left to form the Legion, and yet was later merged with the establishment forces to help consolidate Carol's reign.

Codreanu and the Legion attacked this decadent regime, who were far too corrupt to sincerely embrace any of these things, from the Right. Eventually it was the extreme-Left who got control of Romania, with the help of the USSR. But even Ceausescu had to co-opt these powerful forces since he could not crush them outright, leading to something resembling 'National Bolshevism'. You can also see similar nationalism-communism hybrids in neighbouring countries, such as Todor Zhivkov's Bulgaria, which actually deported much of its Turkish minority left over from Ottoman times to Turkey.

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

he could have made Romania a top-of-the-line nation.

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. Romania has been everyone's bitch since ancient Rome. Where do you think the name Romania comes from?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The difference is he kept Germany fighting, even when the odds of any victory was 0. Japan was in the exact same position, where nuclear bombs would have kept falling until they came to the peace table. It would be Tojo's fault if a 3rd or 4th nuke had fallen if he gave orders to keep fighting instead of surrender.

There was also no ethnic balance in Europe otherwise WW2 wouldn't have happened, come on now.

I'm unaware of what ethnic issues existed in Spain or Italy. Spain fought a civil war, but it's not like they had to invade France and the rest of Europe to keep the majority of Spain as Spanish.

Mussolini was definitely Imperialist with his Africa campaigns, but it had less to do with racial conflicts in his own country and more to do with empire building.

[–]nordmannenLegionnaire 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I understand now. However, Italy and Spain also didn't have large diaspora populations scattered across Europe like Germany. Arguably Italy had some, but large amounts of Germans were in foreign lands and, in the case of countries like Poland and Czechoslovakia, were being persecuted. These are not issues Spain ever had to face, so the comparison is not fair.

Also, I'm not really sure if surrendering would have mattered. The depopulation of Germans in eastern Europe happened after ww2 anyway, and plenty of lands were demographically replaced after Germany had been neutralized. If for some reason you believe things would have been easier if the Nazis surrendered earlier, there is really no proof of that. Nothing stopped the RAF from decimating cities with the intention of burning out the German identity. Nothing stopped the Russians from ethnic cleansing Prussia. That was a war waged to pacify the Germans, and they could have bent over and taken it or fought to the end, the result would be the same.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I understand now. However, Italy and Spain also didn't have large diaspora populations scattered across Europe like Germany. Arguably Italy had some, but large amounts of Germans were in foreign lands and, in the case of countries like Poland and Czechoslovakia, were being persecuted. These are not issues Spain ever had to face, so the comparison is not fair.

What are Germans doing in foreign countries, and why not return home if they didn't like being there? If Hitler wanted to unite them, he already had other means of doing so, like Austria voting to unite with Germany. But if you're going to bomb every country because one of your guys happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time then no, that's BS.

If for some reason you believe things would have been easier if the Nazis surrendered earlier, there is really no proof of that.

Churchill at least wanted to go to war with the Soviets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

It makes no sense why would the Allies waste their resources on a country that's already beaten, when they can move on with the next agenda.

If anything, Germany surrendering after 5 years fucked that up. Everyone was exhausted by that point, and the Soviets now had control of several Eastern European countries, including half of Germany.

[–]nordmannenLegionnaire 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you serious? Some of it was because of Versailles, some of it was because of the HRE, frankly by 1933 it didn't matter, these were populations that existed for hundreds of years and were as tied to their land as the countries that ruled over them. Was it Germany's fault that Versailles cut away large amounts of Germans from their country? Was it Germany's fault that the collapse of Austro-Hungary didn't lead to an immediate plebiscite and/or mass exodus? I refuse to believe this is a real argument.

Capitalists will always turn on their allies whenever the time is right, nothing is new or surprising there. It doesn't change the fact that the RAF bombed with the intention to remove cultural identity. Explain why they leveled Königsberg, and why no city, even Leningrad, did not receive a similar treatment.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you serious? Some of it was because of Versailles, some of it was because of the HRE, frankly by 1933 it didn't matter, these were populations that existed for hundreds of years and were as tied to their land as the countries that ruled over them. Was it Germany's fault that Versailles cut away large amounts of Germans from their country? Was it Germany's fault that the collapse of Austro-Hungary didn't lead to an immediate plebiscite and/or mass exodus? I refuse to believe this is a real argument.

You need to be pragmatic. Borders change all the time, and as long as an actual German homeland exists, they would have infinitely been better off moving back there than being a minority somewhere else. Living somewhere for a hundred years is not an excuse.

Ever heard of magic dirt? Germany only exists because ethnic Germans live together.

Capitalists will always turn on their allies whenever the time is right, nothing is new or surprising there.

Then Germany surrendering would have made that a reality much sooner, rather than later.

Explain why they leveled Königsberg, and why no city, even Leningrad, did not receive a similar treatment.

Because every side back then was ruthless? I never claimed otherwise.

What I don't claim is Britain would waste their bombs on a country that has already surrendered to them. A new German leader would have been installed and ironically enough, they would be sent to fight Russia anyway as part of a new Western Coalition. Missed opportunity if you ask me.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Hitler didn't leave his nation in ruin. War did that. Hitler did not want war. The Rothschild controlled countries wanted war.

[–]weavilsatemyface 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hitler did not want war.

For fucks sake, Hitler was constantly going on about how war made a nation strong, that peace was for the weak.

If you believe that "Hitler did not want war" you probably believe that Epstein killed himself, Saddam Hussein had nuclear bombs, the 2020 American presidential election was the fairest and most secure in all of history, it's only "a few bad apples" among the police that are abusive, Elliot Page is a man, and the Covid-19 virus has nothing to do with the Wuhan lab.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

By 1944, Operation Bagration was a success and Germany had no chance at capturing the Russian oil fields they desperately needed. The Western Allies also manage to liberate France and would have launched a similar invasion into Germany.

Surrender should have been on the table at that point to spare further suffering, and even Germany's military command were dissatisfied at Hitler's failure's to turn the war around, hence why he was nearly assassinated in the July plot.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

By 1944, Operation Bagration was a success and Germany had no chance at capturing the oil fields they desperately needed.

The war was probably lost even before that (oil and air superiority defined that war). Hitler should have wiped out the English at Dunkirk but he was too compassionate toward his fellow Europeans. Compassion needs suspended during war. Many of Hitler's generals knew that but Hitler ignored them.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, he was counting on some degree of honor from his counterparts. Oh, how wrong he was. Especially with the Churchill sack-o-shit.

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hitler should have wiped out the English at Dunkirk but he was too compassionate toward his fellow Europeans.

"His fellow Europeans", what a wanker.

Hitler didn't want to hammer the English at that time because he thought that Britain and America would change sides and ally themselves with Germany against the rest of Europe. He had this fantasy of unifying all of the Germanic peoples of Europe into Greater Germany, except for two groups: Britain, which would remain independent, and north Italian Germans, who would remain in Italy as a reward for Mussolini.

To the day he died, he never understood how the Americans and British didn't take his side. Talk about a delusional fool.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Allies weren't going to allow Germany to surrender and keep sovereignty.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine if every country made that claim.

"I don't want to surrender because I might lose!"

"But I'm still going to launch missiles at your cities and torture your POW's".

We would still be stuck in the stone ages.

[–]Richard_Parker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. His incompetence from the mid war period on lost the war that the vaunted deutsche Wehrmacht had largely won. He also brutalized European Slavic peoples. Still lesser of all evils..Even so, while I am alrgely pro-Nazi and certainly pro Wehrmacht and empathize with many of Germany's grievance both before and after the war, I am quite adverse to Hitler. Do not just take it from me, though, read the memoirs of Manstein and Guderian, among others.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Hitler was a great guy and more people should get to know who he really was.

Yeah, Hitler was a great guy if you want your country to be utterly destroyed by an idiot who was obsessed with a fantasy of "Jews destroying Europe".

Hitler:

  • said that Germany should never again get involved in a two front war;
  • immediately got Germany involved in a two-front war;
  • said that he wanted to destroy Communism;
  • handed eastern Europe to the Communists;
  • said that Germany should never get into a war against America;
  • immediately declared war on America after Pearl Harbour;
  • believed that he was sent by "Providence" (God) to save Germany;
  • destroyed Germany so badly that it was split into two, and only by the grace of the Americans, French and British it wasn't split into even more pieces;
  • thought that old Germanic and Norse myths were rubbish, but surrounded himself with nutcases and loons who thought that the old pagan myths were true;
  • played the Nazi leadership against each other so that they were constantly undermining each others' goals;
  • had a massive temper-tantrum on German's defeat, which was caused by his over-reaching ambition and incompetence, and ordered for Germany to be utterly destroyed, every city, every town, every farm was to be razed to the ground, every bridge destroyed so that Germans would be pushed into the Dark Ages (Albert Speer countermanded this order).

Hitler took credit for the economic improvements done by the Wiemar republic (for example, it was them, not the Nazis, who started the autobahns -- Hitler just swept in and stole the credit). Once he started running the economy, he destroyed it. For years, the only thing keeping Germany going was the wealth and literal slave labour he was able to get from the war. Had the war ended, and those sources of cheap labour and wealth had dried up, the German economy would have collapsed.

He was an idiot and a boob, he believed in pure nonsense and was incompetent at running the country. Even in his love-life he was a freak: nobody knows what, exactly, but he was so perverted that he drove the love of his life to suicide. Eva Brown must have had balls of steel to stay with him -- or maybe she shared his kink.

[–]nordmannenLegionnaire 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What the fuck did I just read? Take your meds for Gods sake.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What the fuck did I just read?

It's called reality. You might need a fucking big dose of it, possibly inserted up your arse with a pile driver, if you think that Hitler was anything but an unmitigated disaster for Germany and Europe.

He was a drug-addicted borderline psychotic with delusions of grandeur, a sexual pervert, an incompetent leader who micro-managed the personal equipment used by German soldiers and then made terrible strategic decisions, a boob who slept through the most critical period of the D-Day invasion and pretty much lost the war for Germany. His 1000 year Reich lasted 12 years. After WW1, no enemy soldier had stepped foot on German soil. After WW2, Germany ceased to exist except for the largesse of the victors.

He may have had charisma, he may have been able to bully the weak and frightened, but he was shit at nearly everything else.

(I'll give him this much, unlike Mussolini, who was a coward who strutted around like a cock in a barnyard, Hitler actually did have personal courage -- at least as a young man, and even if he took the coward's way out in 1945 with the Red Army knocking at his door.)

The idea that there are still people who think that Hitler the loser was "ok" and "really cool" pretty much proves that people prefer fantasies over reality.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lmao. These claims are so silly and wrong. You obviously just copy and pasted some conservative or liberal screed.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These claims are so silly and wrong.

Oh, I'm sorry, did Germany win WW2, and eastern Europe didn't really get stuck under the control of the USSR for forty years? My mistake.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Hitler did think fantasising about ruins and Teutonic knights was idiotic and pointless. No different than someone sperging over Star Wars.

[–]jykylsin2034 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So glad we're back on all

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Most 'anti Hitler' things I read and then dig down on end up making sense considering the situation. I'm sure (assuming it's true) 'executing protesters' is no different. I'm sure you familiar with the tyrant Lincoln and his locking up of the press? All things should be judged with the context of the situation and not by current 2021 peace time standards.

    You do realize that the people that Hitler was fighting against are locking up (and in many cases killing) opposition as well right? You do realize the current regime controlled the US wants an international slave state and the breeding out of European genetics right? Fuck the 'right to protest' if your goal is genocide of my people and a mixed race worldwide slave state. You also realize this is a dissident discussion forum right? We're not constitutional conservatives or libertarians. Not all but many of us are fascists we don't believe in universal human rights and especially don't believe in 'humanism' or 'human rights' as they are framed by anti white Jews. Humanism and democracy are subversive ideas to get Europeans to open their nations, their coffers and their gene pools to subversive elements. Usury was a mistake. We are not 'progressing' we are degenerating. The enlightenment was a mistake. Bring back the bronze age and the death of these silly notions that all men are created equal.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    150,000 Jews fought for the Reich, curiously. Also, if you take into accout their arrest books which show their goal of liquidating banks of all kinds, you'd be hard pressed not to find at that time all kinds of stories or treachery, backstabbing, bombings, hired assassinations, espeically when the bankers purse is being played for a fool.

    [–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Don't waste your time debating anything related to Nazism and Hitler on this sub,just hide them, Nazi apologists will pull whatever convoluted source or video or book out of their asses just to defend their precious mass murdering drug addict. Don't waste your time.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Isn't Youcis that race baiter who hung out with fed ice radio’s lana lokteV whose father has GRU connections and pushed LGTBQ propaganda in San Francisco?

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Isn't Youcis that race baiter

    Another unsubstantiated attack. What does calling a white nationalist a 'race baiter' even mean? By the current 'approved' media narratives any talk about race is race baiting.

    who hung out with fed ice radio’s lana lokteV whose father has GRU connections

    Two more attacks without evidence.

    You've been warned multiple times about this. You're looking more and more like someone who is here to purposefully sow division and discord. You do not appear to be here in good faith. You never provide 'non zionist' alternatives or 'non fed' alternatives. Everyone is a fed or zionist too you. You simply destroy and never build. This impulse to destroy is not a catholic trait or a white trait which makes me really question if you are not misrepresenting yourself (which is a rule three violation).

    Against my better judgement I'm only going to ban you for 7 days instead of 30 or permanently. If you choose to return please attempt to engage in good faith and do not make every comment and post about someone being a fed or zionist. It's annoying and exhausting for everyone involved.