Saying Jews should go somewhere else is not zionism. It's just not.

I never claimed it was. I stated it was basically a sub-franchise 'McDonalds' ideology, not religious (only in the counterfeit sense of land grabbing by way of 'Chosenite status,' ie. a corporate ideology for an east-west axis outpost by way of commercialising Palestine by first immoral and highly questionable means via forging documents and then by sword and bomb which was funded by corporations and wealthy US Jewish bankers. The settler is needed as an excuse to further the Zionist project and so it is important to a.) scare Jews with Jew Nazi larps goose-stepping in Diaspora Jewish neighborhoods (that's where the ACLU comes into play) so as to increase Jewish agency funding to Israel LLC and b.) to have as many Jews make Aliyah to Israel whilst also having the plutocratic Diaspora Jew maintain bases in every single country and siphon as much funds needed for the cause.

It seems like your definition of 'zionist' is anybody that doesn't want to nuke Israel right this moment.

So, you're perceived view of my definition of Zionism, though I believe I laid it out clearly, is that I'm all for nuking Israel, a counterfeit state controlled by Edomites, Khazars and Canaanites, and that anybody who disagrees with this is a Zionist? I believe that is piss poor reading comprehension skills.

That's really not a fair description.

My definition was clear and legally binding.

Zionism is Jewish people that believe Jews should rule the world and do it from the Levant.

Yes. But it is also an east-west axis point where Jews, accepting Zionism as their backwards belief system, with all their obscenities and anti-Christian attitudes, can sit atop the world in total control of economics and finance where as Ben Gurion made quite clear, a supreme court of mankind would be erected to sort out all nation state issues.

Specifically Israel. A white evangelical that supports Israel isn't really a zionist either in my opinion because they are brainwashed by Scofield bible bullshit.

Of course, but Protestants reject the high and fall for the low. They preach Rousseau's social contract concept with all the Judaeo-Freemasonic naturalist tendecies therein. Opening the society up to fervent individualism which thwarts the end that all authority must instill from the most high. Once we accepted the caprices of socieity we made a social contract to thwart Gods covenant and accept the morally destructive whim of Judaeo-masonic naturalism. Protestantism was not strong enough, nor smart enough to prevent such rejection of Him. They had it coming because of their own ignorance and stupidity. It became a breeder for all things masonic. To discover that the reformation was a Jewish inception, see Calvin (Cohen) which opened up society to the individualist concept of naturalism before god, to mammon before Him, it was quite easy for the social contract to be instilled on the basis of rejection of Christ and promotion of mammon above all else.

They don't really even know what real zionism is.

Scofield was paid by a bunch of Zionist plutocratic Jews and reading socieities to trick Christians into supporting the re-establishment of a Jewish majority state on the east-west axis (multi-Uni divide) point. Scofield was not the only one. Many came before him, including the crypto-Jew Joseph Smith, former freemason and founder of Mormonism who made it his mission to restore the Jewish majorty state. He himself studied the Cabala under the direction of the the Sexias family. A rich slave owning Jewish banking family from Newport, RI.

Calling everyone that opposes Jews 'zionists' because they don't oppose Israel the way you want them too can be considered and anti debate tactic.

No. I don't call everyone Zionists. Only those who I believe are working with Zionists in operations, or seek to establish a Jewish state from the Nile to the Jordan whilst also preaching an ethnic-white state, does my suspicion come down on them. Especially when they claim they are Traditional Christians but then quote passages from the Bolshevik Dugin who is an admirer of all things Jewish, Cabala and all things anti-Catholic.

I never once claimed Hitler was a Zionist. In fact, he was the exact opposite. Which is why you get the Zionist ops of the labor party where they openly claim Hitler was a Zionist the antithesis then conflicts with this claim—that he most certainly wasn't—to cause conflict, which further ingrains the Zionist belief into the heads of Jews and increases Jewish agency contributions.

Mike Enoch and many in the alt right simply want Jews that hate white people to go to other spaces away from white people and stop genociding whites. I don't think that's too much too ask.

What is Mike's real last name? Maurice Pinay, among other Catholics, have opnely exposed these anti-Christ buffoons. The goal of Chabad, mind you, is to have Jews make Aliyah, that is they are fervent proselytisers, that they must make Jews a seperate class, a class of natural Messiahs to have their own nation and when the false Jewish 'messiah' comes, as a man, he will destroy the Christian nations, America, the UK, etc., as Edom as Amalaks, no different to what they did on 9/11 (9/11 was Purim for goyim) but far worse.

As a Catholic I observe alt-right larpers through the lens of a Catholic and when some try to claim they are Christian or Catholic, as Fuentes does, I know as a Catholic they are larping anti-Christs working for the same Jews they say they are exposing. They have no idea what being a Catholic is and it is quite clear what they are doing. They all, mind you, reject the Mystical Body of Christ and the santification of grace and instead hangout with David Horowitz, various pro-Likudnik Jews, GRU agents, etc.

Not everyone in the dissident right rejects Christ. I'm a sedevacantist Catholic. I believe in Jesus Christ but I think the current Catholic church is compromised by globalists and people that hate white people and white culture.

Indeed, but understand that the current Catholic church is completely overtaken by Talmudics and Marranos. Francis Bergoglio is anything but a Catholic. A quick reading of mauricepinay.blogspot.com and callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com is a start.

I'd say a good 20-40% of the alt right dissident right is Christian and a good chunk (maybe 15%?) are trad Catholics.

We can guess all we want but we must judge based on good principals through Him, and by Him judge the words that they speak and actions and fruits they bear. If they openly say something contradictory to the sanctification of grace and mystical body of Christ, than they are a fervent for Masonic-naturalism. Fahey CSSp lays this out quite eloquently in his serval books. That these agents, Jews and masons, will push the nation and social contract into the direction that never will make acquaintance with the Mysical Body of Christ.