you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Science-wise, LGBT identities are upheld by many experts in the present day, with many agencies having declassified homosexuality and transgenderism as mental disorders and publishing studies to support the idea that it is naturally prevalent and doable

I'm going to start with a simple question. If a consensus of 'experts in the present day' shifted and said that the LGBT 'lifestyle' was toxic, dangerous and should be discouraged for the good of the country and public health would you change your position and oppose it? Is this really about data and science for you?

[–]Fonched[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I am just looking into what reasoning and evidence they have for being pro-gay. If the medical and scientific experts shifted back to that stance, I would also look into what they have to say. Then I would compare the facts.

[–]Girondin 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read the history of this stuff, notice how many of them are sexually deviant / non-normative. A lot of their positions is not grounded in objective reality but on personal wish-fulfillment. most of the experts are employed in gender clinics and/or gain rewards and prestige from advocacy groups, so of course their supportive of LGBTQ acceptance.

Im not denying all of their research or theories or whatever, but their is bias just like all fields of inquiry. like people in quaranic or biblical studies think it is more important then it is, sociologist thinking social effects matter more compared to evo psychologist who think biology matter more etc.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most people I chat with online that support the LGBT community don't do it because the woke academic institutions say that it's safe and healthy to be LBGT. They support the LGBT community because there's a framing in the Jewish run media that LGBT people are an innocent persecuted group of individuals historically and presently. There are lot more layers of complexity though.

The Jewish people have a long running religious belief that 'God' has both male and female traits. This drives their desire to protect and promote LGBT. Another big reason the Jewish community funds and fervently supports LGBT is because they oppose traditional 'cis gender' societies for a host of reasons. Creating a large homosexual population in a host nation reduces birth rates and causes a support for Jewish causes. It's a way to create a 'golem' for Jews.

[–]Fonched[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is true to an extent, basically pushback whenever someone's not tolerant and loving. It's when rebuttals along the lines of LGBT science appear, even with the more intellectual leftists. Then it needs to be researched.

As for them, yes. I believe the Torah mentions people with different kinds of genders. Plus they comment on how they fare better in diverse communities. Although everything is just a canard and organically driven by other people...