Did Mike "Enoch" really say: "If you're going to let in a mixed Jewish person, they really have to have done something to earn it. And I think that in my case, I did."

submitted by Jesus from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's so fucking tedious and I'm getting sick of it. Thing is even if you say that then often the response is going to be some version of 'oh well if I'm getting this response then I must be on to something' or 'ha look who's upset found the jew!'

I guess the lesson is just stay away from the schizos because they will just drag you down to the shit with them but then again you can't just let them turn the entire place into a gossip club where people fling endless accusations over and over.

[–]Nasser 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I also think the dumbshit attitude this sub has of accusing everyone of being the Salos boomercon is pretty dumb and unproductive to.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fuck them too. They're just as stupid as this stuff. If you want to post breitbart tier shit then you have breitbart. Dont waste the dr's time with that crap. Those people deserve derision.

Also I'm absolutely not saying I wouldn't like to discuss or debate those things with them. However a guy like 'republican58' never actually debates anything. He just posts boomer cringe, gets push back and then acts shocked. That's why he's banned because he was never here to debate in the first place.

[–]Nasser 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Republican58 definitely but I think people get to witch hunt esque when accusing people they suspect of being him. I've been accused of being him one time, soylent has been accused of being him etc, basically anyone who thinks we need to watch optics or tone down rhetoric to pragmatically recruit moderate whites is targeted and accused of being him.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fair enough I can see how that's annoying. Then again I can also understand the push back because we've seen this time and time again where dissident political movements start to do their optics thing and eventually people can't tell what the original message is anymore and the original idea becomes marginalized and in fact hated. It's a tough balancing act and I think being accused of being a 'shill' from time to time is a small price to pay. Also Soylent openly says he's not one of us and describes our racial ideas in negative terms. I think it's pretty obvious why some people would push back against that and why it's not some personal witch hunt. I have nothing against him and have never found anything about your posts objectionable but you have to understand why people would react negatively to an outsider simply calling them 'obsessed' and dismissing their ideas.