you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The whole argument of racial trauma presupposes the existence of a white supremacist state. Anyone who believes that are unlikely to be swayed by any arguments you can make.

Look forward to seeing your work tho.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The whole argument of racial trauma presupposes the existence of a white supremacist state.

Maybe the Left thinks that way, but I would like to flip this idea on its head and make the concept universal.

For example, I don't think it's a complete lie to say that exposing people to certain media can have a psychological effect on them. This is already proven with other studies like Women's anorexia, or showing children professional wrestling videos can raise aggression levels.

So when it comes to "racial trauma", it's very candid of this organization to leave out zero mentions of White people feeling fatigue or being oppressed. Did they think no one would ever try this experiment out and later come back to refute them with it? And once that information is out, they can either try their best to suppress it, or become forced to admit they were wrong and make changes to their article that accepts White people are being physically harmed as well. The later is how science normally works. New evidence displaces the old.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But the whole argument presupposes a white supremacist state. Whites as a class by definition can’t be oppressed in any meaningful way in a white supremacist state.

That’s the problem with all this “scientific” research, they start their research on a faulty premise then purposefully use a fucked up methodology. It happens all the time.