A much better idea at debunking the Far-Left/Multiculturalism.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]peaceful✞ 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You have no access to the masses so you can't convert white normies. They still go back to their anti-white societal influences after speaking to you. If you get regular access to the masses then any number of different messages could succeed over time.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But everyone is exposed to anti-white influences. Even you. But that has never been an obstacle towards changing minds. Otherwise, no one would ever believe or attempt anything if life was set in stone and predetermined.

I also don't see this as a numbers game. Just talking to ordinary people on the streets and challenging their worldview is already a good achievement.

[–]peaceful✞ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The media and popular culture determines mostly everything that people believe. Also, that which seems morally right, such as anti-racism.

How do you expect any alt-right goals to occur without big numbers? An ethnostate, for example?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The media and popular culture determines mostly everything that people believe.

Actually I disagree. Evidence does.

The media could start printing tomorrow that the Earth is flat. But if most people already educated on this subject know the Earth is round, why would they suddenly change their belief?

It's why it's even possible to change an individual's belief. If you show someone irrefutable evidence of white demographic change, they can make up excuses for it or just pretend to shrug it off. But they can't actually dismiss facts for being fake.

[–]peaceful✞ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The media is what educates and informs people. A flat earth is an extreme example, but the media can easily influence beliefs on things that are subjective like racial equality and multiracialism, or like politics, or like the safety of vaccines.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And the media comes in many forms. Like Saidit is still considered media, and so is Breitbart. But at the end of the day, it's still most likely evidence that's responsible for what people believe in.

It's why this thread exists. I acknowledge that the Left clearly has evidence or "arguments" that they insert into mass media platforms that defend diversity. But like all things in science, nothing is exempt from criticism or scrutiny. Especially as many things throughout history we thought was "true" were later considered outdated and thus discredited. Prior to 2006, anyone who considered Pluto a Planet wasn't necessarily an asshole. This was a widespread belief everywhere based on previous findings, until a new consensus was reached that decided "Pluto should be classified as something else".

I guess the hard part is putting up with censorship that comes with a lot mass media platforms who will reject evidence even if it's proven to be true. But I don't consider this to be end, nor a unique example. In fact, I believe censorship has always existed, and yet human societies still manage to change and adapt to new evidence all the time.