Richard_Parker comments on Incels

Got user flair? ⇧ ⇧ ⇧

Rules

1) Rule 1: Follow all of saidit's sitewide rules. Extra emphasis on this rule against advocating violence. We do not care what the context is or even whether or not it is a joke.

2) Rule 2: No anti debate tactics, especially tone policing (aka concern trolling). A form of ad hominem attack, tone policing is criticism of people or groups that express emotion. Tone trolls act like they are on your side, ignore arguments, and attack the 'optics' or 'tone' of the message. By their very nature alternative and dissident political arguments will often be offensive and provoke emotion. Many new users may be angry or emotional as they wake up to the realities of modern clown world. "I'm offended by how you said that" will not be a justification for comment removal.

3) Rule 3: No misrepresentation of your political, ethnic, racial or religious positions.

4) Rule 4: Link Posting, low effort posts, or thread abandonment will be given a warning and then deleted. When posting links to media you must be familiar with it and provide some type of summary. Do not ask for people's 'thoughts' on something you yourself have not read, watched, or listened too. Do your best to specify what you are asking.

5) Rule 5: When in doubt archive it. If you're sharing a link to an article or video but the site has other content DAR users might find offensive or criminal please use an archive service like archive.ph. This allows people to read the article without supporting the site with views. This goes for both left and right wing sites.

Sister Site(s)

Frens

New to the Alt Right/Dissident Right?

Tools

Archives

Guides

Backups

Websites

Edgy & Humorous Dissident Content

Paleocons

News Feeds

Incels

submitted 2 years ago by weaselWhite Nationalist from self.debatealtright

26 comments

new insightful fun

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Richard_Parker 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (3 children)

I would only add to your comment social proof. Adam Carolla commented on this in one of his first shows. He noted that if a good looking actor (he gives George Clooney, never really understood what made him such a sex symbol, so I would suggest Christian Bale) starts dating and fucking a woman who is reminiscent of Natalie from Facts of Life, that will not make her more attractive to guys. While being a c list celeberity and having some money helps, David Spade apparently is nailing all sorts of ten California "mattresses"" (ie aspiring models-actresses) because he fucked Heather Locklear. So even though the guy is a manlet, feminine etc, these women learn about Heather Locklear, and, combine that with some modicum of fame and money, they pull their ankles up to their shoulders--like the dumb fucking whores they are. His buddy Ray Oldhafer is another example. Ray lost his viriginity at 14, and despite doing all sorts of stupid, gross shit (including shitting in a pool) and never being all that successful, according to Carolla the guy always had women around him. That early success at 14 brings about further success. It helps the guy is a freakishly strong specimen. Carolla thinks he could have made it in the NFL if he applied himself, but the real factor is getting laid at 14. Nothing succeeds like success, and that is most true with women.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (2 children)

I did not know that about Spade. Doesn't surprise me though. That's the power of social proof. Spade is short. He's getting old as fuck. His career was short and since he's not making many more movies he's probably running out of money. Heck he's not even traditionally masculine looking. YET he drowns in pussy.

I once heard the phrase 'genetic celebrity' to define attractive women and I think that's a very apt description. If you are a women you can't easily fake youth and beauty. You've got it or you don't. With men our appeal to a large degree comes from what we can provide, the experiences we gather, the social circle a women will enter into if she fuck us, and of course the attention her new relationship brings. Our genetic fitness for a women is a lot more resource based. Of course we could get into the dual mating strategies women use but that's probably beyond the scope of this conversation and getting off topic.

Thanks for your examples though. All very good stuff.

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (1 child)

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)

did you see my post above?

I did.

opposed to the unique, brightitund of am outcast herself...

It's seems like women seek out that which they lack. If they come from money they get obsessed with artsy types or athletic types. They seem less worried about if the guy has money. Fame is always valuable though. Women project themselves onto the man they desire. They see the world as a giant social approval pyramid and assume men think the same. They have a weak theory of mind and can personally empathize but cannot creatively empathize about strangers.

You didn't by any chance post over on r/theredpill back in the day? Seems like that sub had a few years where is was on fire. I think a lot of redpilled writers ventured into the alt right space. There's some crossover between the two camps that's for sure. BAP is absolutely my favorite gender redpill/fitness/white nationalism crossover writer. I think we need some more of these guys. I'd like to see Chateu Heartiste and Roosh get even more into pro white nationalist literature. There's a need for this type of writing.

debatealtright

Got user flair? ⇧ ⇧ ⇧

MODERATORS