Follow up on Fuentes philo-Semitism and connections to radical Jews and Zionists

submitted by Jesus from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Anyone wish to debunk or post a contention?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Saying that people are overreacting to Gaetz and a 17 year old is not promotion of pedophilia. I don't have the time this morning to read the rest of your latest torrent post. If you want people to respond in detail you should shorten and chunk things up into to more manageable clusters for us small brains. Your writing style is like a ten gauge shotgun blast to the face (and not in a good way).

Why don't you weave your sources, statistics, and facts up in a narrative and give us a thesis instead of just vomiting information all over the place? Why don't you consider paragraphs with topic sentences? Maybe also look up how to use signal phrases and to incorporate information into sentences. The use of brackets and parenthesis to create a hyperlink would also shorten your presentation. And please don't use the excuse that you don't have time to do all that. If you don't have time to present your information in a readable way we don't have time to digest it and we certainly don't have time to give you feedback.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, the problem is he promotes such, as a faux Catholic grifter and hangs around with subversive radical Jews. If you have connections to RAND employees, Glosar and David Horowitz you are probably a plant. Fuentes is a plant in my mind and I will nto change me mind on this. Maybe read the rest of the thread.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your writing style is like a ten gauge shotgun blast to the face (and not in a good way).

If that's a problem, I'm sorry, they are mostly twitter posts I had found or originally posted on my now banned Twitter account.

Why don't you weave your sources, statistics, and facts up in a narrative and give us a thesis instead of just vomiting information all over the place?

The post is not long, and the links can easily be clicked and read. If this is too hard for you I'm sorry.

Why don't you consider paragraphs with topic sentences?

I do but for this I wanted to get the information out and didn't feel the need to write a thesis on it. The information is there to see and if you just s pend 10 mins and click some the of the links you'll understand where Groyper the Catholic defamer Jew is coming from.

Maybe also look up how to use signal phrases and to incorporate information into sentences. The use of brackets and parenthesis to create a hyperlink would also shorten your presentation.

How to do this?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How to do this?

[text goes here](http link goes here)

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I do but for this I wanted to get the information out and didn't feel the need to write a thesis on it

By 'thesis' I just mean a clearly stated position you have on all the information you are presenting (so we can grasp the underlying thrust of why you are giving us all this info and why it's important). Casparon has gotten better at this. I'd look at some of his posts for an example.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, okay. I'll fix up the Fuentes post because I do believe he is an asset of that 'pro-America" David Horowitz group.