all 44 comments

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Spencer has just lost the plot. But I just think arguing the Fuentes is jewish completely undermines your credibility here. I mean gimme a break.

[–]scormac1752 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I would agree completely with this. The whole reason that we know of Richard Spencer is because the media likes to use him to represent the alt-right; and if the media likes to use someone a lot, then that person is probably not a great representative of the issue. In Spencer's case, he's missing the morality (the heart and soul) that is Christianity; he's a dorky atheist and his optics on the whole are awful.

And in Fuentes's case, if he's actually a Zionist plant, he's playing 4D chess, because I can't see how on Earth his voice benefits (((their))) cause. He's just redpilling Zoomers like me all day long.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How he benefits them? He is vulgar, edgy and creates antisemitism. That's a good adversary to point to if you want to gather support. Zionists need antisemitism in order for jews to move to Israel.

I like him though. He is funny

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Well the media did use Fuentes and he hangs around with Baked Alaska eho hangs around with Zionist plants.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

he hangs around with Baked Alaska

Maybe Baked is supplying him with cocaine?

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

No they all are working for Zionist Jews.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Their schtick seems extraordinarily successful.

As for Baked, I saw some of his streams during the "Team Erin" days, and there is something seriously wrong with that guy. Beside the drugs, I mean.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It is... they scapegoat Esau and then hijack patriot and whatever other movements they can to steer people away from actually doing something. It's like I had a state department dad Owen Benjamin (Smith). Guy is unfunny says the Jews control everything but is friends with the son of Jules Kroll who had a hand in 9/11 and operates K2 Intelligence and DevOps.

Remember, if they are Jewish and doing this, don't trust them. If they are connected to Jews or are promoted by Jews such as the Homo Zionsit Milo, who, for instance, promotes Owen and Fuentes, then yes, they are coming from the same subversive groups.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He might be. If he is endorsing People married to neocon Jews and admits to believing the Holocaust 6 mil figure to a Zionist Jew... he might just be a Sephardi Jew. Doesn't mean he'a a practicing rabbi or anything, he's Just scapegoating Esau.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Is anything real at this point...

[–]Jesus[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Just Jews scapegoating and leading controlled oppositions and cointelpro

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's real annoying.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The Hitler and the early NSDAP received Jew money via Jacob Schiff.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Source?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I originally read it in a Michael Hoffman book. It's pretty well known though that Schiff, Warberg, and several other wealthy Rothschild connected financiers were funding opposing political parties (Bolshevik and fascist) all over the world following WWI.

Even though I think Hoffman is correct in some of his critiques of Hitler I'm still generally favorable on Hitler and of course I support the NSDAP political philosophies and platforms. (Although I think that Hitler made a shit general and should have tried to stay out of the war room as much as possible.)

There are some more theories pushed by Hoffman and others that Hitler was compromised by that initial Jewish bankrolling and was a mason plant the entire time. That's nonsense of course. Hitler clearly took the money and then told the bankers to fuck off. The same way he told the European nations imposing brutal economic sanctions from WWI to fuck off. (that's why the western world turned so hard against his project; if Hitler had won Jew/anglo central banking would have been crushed in perpetuity). If Hitler was some deep masonic plant he wouldn't have raided and ransacked masonic offices in every country he invaded. Hitler also clearly exposed luciferians/mason/jews in many of his public speeches.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hoffman is a controlled opposition. Instead, read Susan Pooles book on who funded Hitler. I have never found any Jewish banker fund Hitler, other than Irving telling us he saw a documemt ie. letter sayings that two German Zionists funded partly the early part of the party. Most of the funds came from speaking, insurance premiums and membership dues.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Susan Pooles

I'll check her out. Thanks.

[–]TheWorldToCome 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

fuentes is fully redpilled on the JQ/holohoax and even used to talk about it openly back when he was on YT, hes just playing a really gay "optics" game by backtracking. Was he paid to keep certain topics off limits...who knows

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He literally endorsed a neocon China women married to a Rand employee neocon Jew and literally admited to a neocon Jew on podcast that I just linked that he believes the figure.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree. He is just lying because he doesn’t want to be cancelled back to the stone age.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alex Jones use to say Mossad did 9-11, now he shills for Bibi and Israel.

[–][deleted]  (25 children)

[deleted]

    [–]weaselWhite Nationalist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

    That first tweet is fake

    [–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

    Is it? If it is let me know and I'll delete it. Nevertheless, Spencer is no different than Tommy Robinson, a dirty Zionist scapegoating Esau.

    [–][deleted]  (17 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      He's gay though. And likely Jewish.

      [–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

      That means it isn't. No source to debunk?

      [–][deleted]  (13 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

        You said you knew for sure that he never wrote this. I doubt this considering he grifts with shills and Zionist plants and his mannerisms are 100% gay.

        [–][deleted]  (11 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

          Well until then I believe it's real and Spencer is probably a plant.

          [–]oneinchterror 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

          It's fake. I follow Spencer on twitter and he did not tweet that.

          [–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          [–]InvoluntaryHalibut 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          What! Im an atheist and there are a very good reasons for thinking gay is wrong. As an evolutionist I know that religious taboos serve a function, they are an evolutionary adaptation, and even if the ostensible reason for gay being wrong is not true (jesus will be mad and you’ll burn in hell) it’s still bad for society, which is why you see taboos against it in far flung societies all over the world. Its frowned on basically everywhere. It is incredibly rational to ban it from your society— when males spend all their time fucking each other in the ass, society falls apart.

          [–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Which is gay.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          And also in a biological necessity worldview.

          For example, I hold that homosexuality is nature's way to terminate some genetic lineages. Defectives are homosexual, therefore they do not reproduce, situation resolves itself.

          [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          I recall debunking the Duginist nonsense a while ago. And you were unable to rebut it

          [–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Dugin

          Never debunked it, just said he is a nothing and doesn't matter. That's not debunking anything. Also, Dugin is a pro-Eurasianist Zionist.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          GTFO with fake and schizophrenic shit, you are not wanted here.