Richard Dawkins gets canceled by the American Humanist Association for wrongthink

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

[deleted]

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

New Atheism was always a completely phoney and astroturfed movement. It started in the mid 2000s and was the main white liberal craze. All of a sudden out of nowhere these ''militant atheists'', these archons of logic and reason appeared on the scene. Appearing on a variety major news outlet, comedy shows and popular events.

Though it ostensibly rose in response to islamic terrorism and to their credit they did address the islamist issue, their focus was always on the non-existent scourge of Christian fundamentalism. Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens, Shermer, Krauss...all waged a never ending jihad on Christianity, and were happily given the platform and funding by media, ngos, think tanks and book publishers.

However, rarely if ever did they address the very real issue of Jewish supremacism. They are never found criticizing the talmud, a book that explicitly calls for the enslavement and destruction of non-Jews, who it denounces as human cattle without souls. Perhaps it had something to with the fact that Hitchens and Harris are half Jews(from their mother's side, meaning they are officially full Jews), Dawkins who also has Jewish ancestry and Kraus who is a full Jew.

Yet why? Why the sudden assault on Christianity which already bent the knee to Jewish power?

I think it was because Christianity still stood as somewhat of a roadblock before the sexual decadence agenda. Even as recent as 2008, politicians on both sides paid lip service to Christianity. To say you disagreed with homosexuality or abortion due to Christ and seek to ban it was a socially acceptable position.

The opposition though ineffective to abortion, gay marriage, complete sexual licentiousness, trannies and pedophilia came mostly from Christians who resisted due to their faith.

Thus, the elites decided that Christianity had to be castrated for good. And the four dogmen of atheism were deployed.

Fast forward 15-20 years later and their mission has long been accomplished. Christianity today is a fully defanged mule, smiling as it takes relentless beatings from the Jewish masters. Go to any major church and what you will hear in their sermons is no different form what you would read in Huffpo. On matters of race, borders, feminism, trannies or sodomy, they have the same opinion as CNN or MSNBC.

With their task now complete, they are no longer needed any more by elites to the same extent in the past. In fact, their classical liberal and scientism-derived dogmas often impede with the latest leftist fad. Most notably trannies and cancel culture in academia. So now they're being thrown under the bus. First it JK Rowling, now its Dawkins, I don't think its long before Harris gets the axe as well.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eh, that's not fair. Christianity lead its own crusade against Atheism before. Perfect example? The entire life of Madalyn Murray O'Hair. Or those cringey as hell campaigns to push Creationism/Intelligent Design in school instead of real science.

And since you whine Atheists weren't antisemitic, she wrote an entire article on questioning the Holocaust.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O%27Hair#Holocaust_denial

In the article "The Shoah: hope springs eternal" in the August 1989 issue of the American Atheist magazine Madalyn Murray O'Hair claimed:[30] Although it is not generally reported, Auschwitz was simply, first, and foremost, a slave labor camp - and the labor provided was much needed by Farben, Krupp, et aI., for the war effort. She claimed in the same article that "investigative and scholarly studies undertaken during the last fifty years", such as a book by the Holocaust denier Paul Rassinier, established that the total number of Jewish victims was between 1 and 1,5 million, adding, "[t]his is a far cry from an alleged 6,000,000", then elaborating on this point: Over and over again in the analysis of the situation, one compelling fact becomes clear. The Germans had nowhere near the train capacity to haul 6,000,000 people to concentration camp points. Had the Germans attempted to house, clothe, and feed 6,000,000 Jews plus millions of others, the activity would have paralyzed their military operations. She concluded: The good news for the Jews of the world is that they did not lose as many of "the clan" as they had thought they lost. Central Europe was, substantially, cleared of Jews, but that was primarily through emigration. The high death rate, from starvation, in the camps during the last months of the war was due largely to the "Allied extermination policies." Perhaps that is why the United States continues to send Israel $6 billion a year as a gift; guilt has its obligation.

Though I do agree that modern Atheists can be cucked. I think the worst I personally know are the ones who reversed their position on Islam or no longer take the threat seriously.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"The Selfish Gene" and "The Extended Phenotype" are two of the most red-pilling books I can imagine. His "we don't HAVE to be racist" has always struck me as bizarre and irrelevant.

If you haven't read either of these, The Selfish Gene basically says that evolution by definition favors selfish genes, or selfish races at another level of abstraction. This is obvious to most people but Dawkins really goes into the math of why this is essentially a tautology. e.g. not all mothers love their children more than neighbors, but those mothers' children die more frequently and become less frequent in the future. Repeat this ad infinitum and you get selfish races, and extinct ones.

Another relevant Dawkins book is "River out of Eden" where he discusses streams of genes that can be thought of as species or races. The set of genes is ~finite so the combinations you get are also finite (barring mutations). Now when two streams merge, e.g. you mix in say Africans and Europeans you are creating an entire new species. It's not a small thing, at all.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If you read his tweets, he is begging his priests for forgiveness and calls republicans bigots.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

link to the tweet of him begging?

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw it on TDW but don't have the link to the tweets anymore. I assume you can find it on his twitter profile. Try searching for "republican bigots"

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dawkins was one of my intellectual heroes.

[–]FriedrichLudwig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dawkins spent his life rallying against religion for not being liberal, progressive and "scientific" enough, and now he's being blacklisted by the vanguards of the secular world he helped create for disagreeing with John Money's worldview.

Not much more to add. Let him reap what he sowed.