you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nasser 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

Agree with the trans one disagree with outlawing same sex marriage. I think it should be by the priest's choice whether he wants to do the marriage. Civil Unions are fine.

[–]VraiBleuScots Protestant, Ulster Loyalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nah, marriage is the state/religious sanctioned union of a man & woman with the intention of encouraging children & stable families.

I’ve got nothing against homosexuals since they’re born that way but it should be encouraged to be kept low key & certainly out of the public sphere.

Why do you agree with the trans one but not the gay? Isn’t that just taking the liberal positon of 10/20 years ago?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not the guy you replied to but gay marriage isn't that big a deal, it doesn't harm anyone or society at large. Men pretending to be women and vice versa is different

[–]VraiBleuScots Protestant, Ulster Loyalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, it’s not the biggest issue of the day no... but I’d definitely consider it something we should oppose.

Homosexuality unnerves people, in that it makes a taboo of more legitimate male bondings, breaks up families, alienates children from their parents, neighbour from neighbour, encourages degenerate lifestyles, the list goes on. In short, it affects society in every way that transvestism does to a lesser degree. The pushing of the latter is just the system growing more brazen as it gains power. Ideally it should ALL be rolled back.

If marriage is a public State sponsored union that comes with it certain expectations & rewards, why should two guys shacking up be able to reap the benefits? Does it do anything for society in return at all?