DEBATE: is crypto economically revolutionary? Kart Thorburn (Yes) vs Z-Man (no)

submitted by Girondin from dlive.tv

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Haven't watched it but I don't really think so. Money at the end of the day, be it ''valueless'' Fiat currency or ''real money'' gold is a fiction agreed upon. It has value because the sovereign decrees that it can be exchanged for goods and services.

No matter how untraceable or discreet your currency is, its worthless if you cannot buy goods or services with it.

And in the modern world of resource centralization, a currency can be easily made worthless. A handful of corporations control the food supply, medical services, banking, retail, travel, electricity and fuel. All of these in turn are owned by a handful of banks like Blackrock, Vanguard, State street, Merril Lynch and JP Morgan.

In any case, the CEOs of these conglomerates are picked from within the ranks of the elite. And these CEOs along with the bankers all sit in the same super-national structures like the CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral commission, Pilgrim's society and so on.

If they ever felt crypto being a threat to their power, they would simply decree that they wouldn't accept any payment in crypto. If Amazon alone came out and said that it would not accept bitcoin or do business with bitcoin farmers and traders, bitcoin's value would plummet through the floor.

Without Amazon, wall mart, Ebay and a handful of other retailers, you couldn't buy most of your life needs. The government wouldn't even need to ban crypto. Corporations could kneecap it with ease.

Sure you could buy and sell bitcoin on the exchange for dollars, but then it wouldn't be currency, it would just be a gambling item like stocks.

Bitcoin, just like fiat money or gold(sorry gold bugs), has no intrinsic value. Its a fable agreed upon.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A handful of corporations control the food supply, medical services, banking, retail, travel, electricity and fuel. All of these in turn are owned by a handful of banks like Blackrock, Vanguard, State street, Merril Lynch and JP Morgan.

And I would add that only a handful of thinktanks have influence over these institutions. Thus the shadow government exposes itself: Companies, banks, thinktanks. The new world order. They are anti nationalism, anti white and especially hellbent on unmitigated global control over all aspects of human life.

I feel like some liberals and non whites I speak with are already somewhat aware of this power shift. However, they are so unaware of statecraft and the politics of individual rights and open society, that they welcome the new order as a cleansing force over the 'evils' of the past. I truly think they could care less if the constitutional government has been overthrown. They are lost in their progressive utopianism and woke religion.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, non-whites for the most part are apolitical. They don't really care about politics, ideology, justice and all that clap-trap. That's an aryan thing. The only populations in which you will see an active interest in politics or world affairs are those with Aryan ancestry like Europeans, Upper caste Indians, Castizos and some Persians. The only other race apart from Aryans to have any interest in politics are Jews. But Jews themselves are 50-60% European, perhaps even more so nowadays considering that they have intermixed heavily with whites over the past 70 years.

Non whites just follow the stream and white liberals are zealous adherents of the woke religion. Northwest Europeans in particular have a tendency for being really invested in abstract concepts like political ideologies and religions. Its not a coincidence that the great wars of religion and ideology all happened in Western Europe: The French wars of religion, the 80 years war, the 30 years war, the French revolution etc.

The witch hunts if you notice all happened in Northwestern Europe. Mostly in Northern Germany, England, Northern France and Scandinavia. These places are more genetically indo-european and are more religious. They were the most devoted Christians. They participated heavily in the crusades, took the bible so literally that they accepted the reformation, in the 19th century they were the most fanatic nationalists and eugenicists, and today they are the most fanatically woke.

These populations have a tendency to be fanatical and highly literal adherents of whatever religion is in vogue. If you look at meds and slavs, you will notice that they have no analog to Northwest European excesses such as mass witch hunts, wars of religion and ultranationalism and eugenics or wokeism.

Italy, Spain and Greece are far less woke as a society compared to Sweden, despite being under the same liberal regime for the same amount of time.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Crypto is revolutionary because of what you're talking about. Bitcoin is the choice of the globalist elite that want international corporations to control the one world currency.

Bitcoin is the currency to grant all power to corporations and to remove all power from governments around the world. That's why owning Bitcoin is great. Well, it's not a good thing, but you might as well benefit financially from knowing the agenda of white genocide.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bitcoin is insurance against getting 109'd

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is economically revolutionary that we have a means to transact across the internet anonymously using a medium of exchange with no regulation and no central bank

End of story. Why would we need to have such a trivial debate