all 30 comments

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Sure. But they aren't my people. They have to go back to their ancestral homelands of Africa, this is non-negotiable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Completely agree, and you should go back to your ancestral homeland of Europe. This non-negotiable.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is supposed to be a shitty insult but I don't disagree, and you'll probably end up getting your wish in a few decades when oppression of Europeans in the US reaches South African levels.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Native Americans are even more opposed to immigration than White people are. They can have some land - they already do, but these could be expanded somewhat. Black descendants of slavery could have some land too.

    [–]Dialgatime321 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think we should give Native Americans of the continental 48 and southern Canada the land mass of Lakotah, or something similar (look it up), kick the 96+% white majority out, and pay Native Americans from across the 48 and southern Canada to move there. We should also disown all the territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.) and disown Hawaii, and give northern Canada, northern Alaska, and Greenland to the Inuits and Aleuts. It is their ancestral right, and our duty as whites to fulfill our ancient promise to them. Adding this to our platform would turn the NAs into a reliably Republican voting bloc, remove the insinuation of hypocrisy, etc.

    Of course, we must also pair this with paying all people who they or their ancestors are exclusively those who have arrived in America since 1965, including Europeans, to return to their origin countries, unconditionally deporting all illegals, and banning all immigration henceforth.

    I also support giving Southwest Texas, most of New Mexico, southern Colorado, Southern Arizona (Tuscon but not Phoenix), and Imperial County, California to Mexico, giving South Florida to the Spanish Caribbean, and giving greater New Orleans to the French black Caribbean, to further this process. The rest of what is left of the US and Canada should then at that point combine.

    Perhaps I could also see an argument for something like a "New France" state that would include Quebec, Acadia (French New Brunswick), Franco-Ontario, and Acadiana/Cajun Country (Cajun Louisiana).

    I call this multilateral nationalism "nationsalism", and it revolves around redrawing borders worldwide, especially in Africa and the Middle East but everywhere really, to better reflect ethnic lines, then paying people to move to their appropriate ethnostate. HOWEVER, this should not be done with special favor to a certain group, not even white people (for example, my division of North America would objectively weaken the US, at least in the short-term).

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]MythOfPrivilege 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      They're separated from every other group of humans by about 200,000 years. Whites and Asians are about 40,000 years apart, IIRC. I remember someone in the old reddit DAR sub floating the idea that Africans were actually surviving descendants of homo Erectus, and that Aborigines were surviving descendants of Australopithecus. For both the skulls look virtually identical to their prehistoric counterparts.

      [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

      No, they are negros

      [–]NegroSex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

      Then why are they capable of producing offspring with whites?

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      There are many species in the wild that have the ability to cross breed but don't produce offspring as strong, intelligent or robust as pairings within the breed.

      You've also created a thread without much explanation. That's a violation of our rules (rule 4). Please provide some more context for DAR members to engage you on (such as giving your position on the question or why you're asking). Simple open ended questions like 'are blacks people' might be misconstrued as 'troll' or 'bad faith' posting. Read our rules carefully and if you have time read the 'guide' on what troll activity looks like so you don't accidentally imitate such activity on our sub.

      You have two hours to update this post with a submission statement in the comments or it will be deleted.

      [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Unrelated, why did you remove the antrim county recount election fraud post?

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      In was a link post. Rule 4.

      I was also unaware that new data/analysis was coming out so it looked like something old to me. A few hours after I deleted that post I noticed that there was some /pol/ discussion on the topic. If it was your post please re-up with some type of explanation of the content and I will approve.

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      There are many species in the wild that have the ability to cross breed but don't produce offspring as strong, intelligent or robust as pairings within the breed.

      The OP is a troll but I want to bring up a flaw in this reasoning. Cross breeding races has never lead to long term deterioration of those things. The proof of this is in White Americans who may have had ancestors that bred with slaves but then later bred with White people again. Yet you would never know if someone who is 1/1024th black is somehow less robust than a pure white man who just came from Europe.

      Personally speaking, there is nothing taboo in admitting that all races had a common ancestor. We could even extend this argument to all animals, hence why Scientists consider them important in certain research that requires treating disease or doing organ transplants. But everyone having a common ancestor doesn't change that White people should be allowed a homeland for themselves, or if they want to breed exclusively with other white people.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      But everyone having a common ancestor doesn't change that White people should be allowed a homeland for themselves

      Agreed, however blacks have 20% DNA from an unknown hominid not found in Caucasoid DNA. Out of Africa is also wrong. Whites are most likely descended from a very small group that survived global flooding (mostly likely on a larder boat like the ark) 6-10k years ago. Blacks are either from a particular voyager on that ark with different genetics (Ham) or hominids that survived the flood coincidentally (in caves, floating islands, pockets spared the flooding, etc).

      That vast differences between whites and blacks are not very likely created by evolution over such short times. (Although environment does play some role).

      If it were unequivocally proven that blacks had the exact same genetic orgins as whites whites would still have the right to freedom of association and ethnostates as they have formed different cultures and genetic expressions than blacks since the common ancestor event. (even though I deny the claim)

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Out of Africa is also wrong.

      I'm not sure where you're getting your sources from, but even people here in the DR aren't denying Out of Africa (See Dragonerne and Cisheteroscum's comments):

      https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/5tuq/debunking_the_out_of_africa_theory/

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The Out of Africa theory has been challenged by many recent archeological discoveries in Europe and Asia. I honestly don't believe it's 100 percent true, the timelines at least have to be moved back much further. However the ark theory is just as ridiculous and doesn't have any sound evidence that I'm aware of.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Nobody in that thread agreed fully with Out of Africa.

      [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Because they contain the blood of the pharaos in their veins. The descendants of Ra from planet Hanum-Ra

      [–]AidsVictim69 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Closely related but different species can produce fertile offspring. In fact it's fairly common for animals to have a small amount of cross species heritage. In whites case we have some neanderthal ancestry, East Asians have more in addition to denisovan ancestry, sub Saharan Africans have multiple unknown sources human like species ancestry (higher towards West Africa). The word "race" as used in biology (as applied to humans it would produce a large amount of "races" and is closer to the way we commonly use ethnicity than race) most accurately describes human differences and races generally can produce fertile offspring.

      [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Short answer yes with an 'if'; long answer no, with a 'but'.

      Seriously though sure they're people. They're just people I'd rather not live around. You'd think everyone who protects the poor little dears would agree with me that we should find a way to amicably divorce given their claim that Whites like me are constantly oppressing them just by existing.

      [–]angryturtle 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      You do realize the entire purpose of troll posts like this is to make the sub look radical and unreasonable.

      The trolls understand that most of the things posted here are totally reasonable, so the concern is that other people will notice this, so they flood the sub with edgy over the top posts knowing that a few idiots will take the bait, and even if none do people visiting the sub will still see the headline and infer this is the default view.

      Its a well known tactic used to discredit dissidents. One preferred by the likes of salos, blork3d etc. It would be like me going to a Jewish room with the name goycattle and posting asking whether goys are even human, then telling everyone hey look at what those Jews are saying about us now! Its blatantly dishonest and is common for adl/jdl shills.

      [–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      homo sapiens? Yes. People? Sure, I guess - but they're not our people.

      Stupid trolls like you accomplish nothing. What even is the point of posting this?

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

      [–]NegroSex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Not funny didn't laugh

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Your name is Negrosex.

      Edgy content sounds like your thing.

      [–]TrabWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Not people I want to live around at the very least

      [–]asterias 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      If you open your door, you will see plenty of "people", but that doesn't mean you would be OK starting a family with them and living under the same roof.

      If by "people" you mean living organisms with inner worth, that opens up another kind of discussion which is not necessarily limited to one race.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]angryturtle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        They arent, for reasons I've never understood. I get that things can be a little looser here than reddit because the sub isnt under the constant threat of being banned, but that doesnt mean you let obvious trolls have their way with the place and use it to propagandize and subvert.

        I guess people just no longer give a shit, but it only takes giving the slightest shit to delete an obvious shitpost from an obvious shitposter making up continuous alts despite none of the previous alts getting banned.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        No, quit being a power hungry janny you dipshit

        [–]arainynightinskyrim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        They are people that belong the the african race, we are people that belong to the european/white race.