The Dissident Right really needs to embrace the climate awareness platform of the left.

submitted by Nasser from (self.debatealtright)

This is the main reason why green parties, particularly in Europe are gaining and effectively blocking our parities from making significant gains, because the people are becoming more and more aware of the impact and consequences of climate change. Climate change denial ism is baseless, ignorant bullshit. The damage to the climate is clear as day in terms of weather conditions, increased natural disasters, melting icecaps and so on.

https://xkcd.com/1732/

The consequences for our race will be apocalyptic especially if we have failed to purge the liberal rot infesting our nations. Climate change will destabilize the massively populated developing world and the hordes will descend on Europe. Liberalism is still in charge and in conjunction with "fellow" white manipulation, they will be allowed in without any push back. The consequences is GG for the White race.

We need to integrate climate awareness and solutions as a core part of ideology, in there with opposing mass immigration. Radical solutions need to happen, consumption must drop, air and sea travel needs to be restricted, global trade has to slow or fall with a push for autarky, overconsumption by the uber rich has to be targeted, nuclear needs to be adopted, cars need to be switched to electric or hell even phased out in cities with increased focus on public transport, climate controls against the top polluters have to be implemented, etc. In general out society needs to revert to the levels in the 1950s or 1970s at most.

So my advice is if you know anyone from any mainstream right wing political parties like the AFD, National Rally, Patriotic Alternative etc, contact them and do your best to convince them as to why adopting this stance is in their best interests and make sure they are serious.

Americans should get contacting the Republicans, even if there is little impact, it may plant some seeds.

From an individual level, it's best you should also get reducing your own carbon footprint and encouraging others to do the same.

all 7 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Girondin 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Your evidence for climate change is a xkcd comic? Individual intervention will do nothing, other actors still participate freely, it's basically a tragedy of the commons.

Will actual top-down interventions even work? I doubt western society reverting to 1950s to 1970s of carbon emission will do much, white countries only make up like a 1/5 of global carbon emissions. The elite and intellectuals will use whatever convenient rationalization to justify mass migration, weather it be global poverty (see Bryan Caplan), military / geopolitics (see Matthew Yglesia), climate change etc. Assuming that AGW continues on unimpeded and it's worst predictions come true Bangladesh, Botswana and some pacific islands are wiped off the earth, it doesn't mean we need to accept climate refugees into white countries, their are plenty of other countries they can be invited to (namely the countries that are close to them).

Im not denying AGW. I just don't see it as a major priority cause.

[–]Girondin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will say though that I do support broader environmentalist causes being talked in the dissident right. Like nature and species preservation, and resource sustainability, climate change activism would be less caustic, you hear constantly about the negative climate change effects of bitcoin, the need for massive top-down restructuring (which I guess does make sense to stop it) and "climate refugees" from [leftist] climate activist.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know a lot about the subject, but my strategy on climate change is simple and effective

The greenest countries are white countries. If something needs to be done about carbon emissions, this will take a complicated multinational effort with many laws and regulations. To implement this, you need a functional government and society. Which means, you need white governments and high-IQ white societies for it to work, irrespective of how real global warming is or isn't. You can't continue to import low-IQ refugees or whatever and beat climate change at the same time

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If something needs to be done about carbon emissions, this will take a complicated multinational effort with many laws and regulations. To implement this, you need a functional government and society. Which means, you need white governments and high-IQ white societies for it to work, irrespective of how real global warming is or isn't. You can't continue to import low-IQ refugees or whatever and beat climate change at the same time

Interesting you say that because I recently read an article that argued just that. I'll be posting about it soon.

[–]Wrangel 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oil is the lifeblood of globalization. It is what allows a globalized economy and the free movement of people over the planet. Revolting against oil is revolting against the foundation of globalization. As for the climate science itself the science is fairly clear, CO2 warms the planet and that will have a major impact on the world. Liberalism has completely failed at tackling this problem and nationalism should provide a better solution.

A common problem on the right is that the left identifies a real problem and finds a bad solution. Instead of coming up with a better solution people on the right deny the problem exists. Greta wants the UN to have more power and that is bad therefore all the problems Greta addresses must be fake. A better approach is to promote your own solutions instead of denying the problem exists. The system does an excellent job at using crises to promote their agenda. 9/11 was used to create a surveillance state when the real solution was deporting muslims. The right is falling in to the trap leftists who claimed 9/11 wasn't a big deal fell into when people on the left were worried about the patriot act.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well said.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been saying this for years now, but what you're saying isn't really true.

This is the main reason why green parties, particularly in Europe are gaining and effectively blocking our parities from making significant gains

This is only true in Germany.

Liberalism is still in charge and in conjunction with "fellow" white manipulation, they will be allowed in without any push back.

That's just not true. Our elites are scared to death of a nativist revolt, which is already materializing. It's why they didn't allow them in last time and sided with Greece against Turkey.

We need to integrate climate awareness and solutions as a core part of ideology, in there with opposing mass immigration. Radical solutions need to happen, consumption must drop, air and sea travel needs to be restricted, global trade has to slow or fall with a push for autarky, overconsumption by the uber rich has to be targeted, nuclear needs to be adopted, cars need to be switched to electric or hell even phased out in cities with increased focus on public transport, climate controls against the top polluters have to be implemented, etc. In general out society needs to revert to the levels in the 1950s or 1970s at most.

I agree with all of this.

So my advice is if you know anyone from any mainstream right wing political parties like the AFD, National Rally, Patriotic Alternative etc, contact them and do your best to convince them as to why adopting this stance is in their best interests and make sure they are serious.

Le Pen is already doing that.

From an individual level, it's best you should also get reducing your own carbon footprint and encouraging others to do the same.

If every European stopped driving his car tomorrow the problem would not be solved at all.