all 8 comments

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How much longer are we going to tolerate this concern troll?

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Name one person who says the second thing (Andrew Anglin doesn't count)

[–]Courbeaux[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Andrew Anglin doesn't count

The owner of the most popular nationalist site in the English-speaking world doesn't count?

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No because he rejected optics a long time ago.

He advocates optics for others who haven't had their names slogged through the machine yet. He specifically cites himself as what will happen to you if you don't remain optical

[–]president_camacho 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't understand why this obvious troll hasn't been banned? He's posted shit like this multiple times. What other sub would tolerate this kind of bullshit?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What other sub would tolerate this kind of bullshit?

This should be a point of pride.

[–]president_camacho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not when it adversely affects the ability to awaken other people to whats going on. This is why this troll does this. He is attempting to portray us as dangerous psychopaths. In reddit he would do the same thing to ban subs as well.

[–]Girondin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The optics debate is stupid.