If Jews can brainwash entire races to modify their behavior...

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]antireddit 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

While their brainwashing certainly seems successful, it's hard to say just how successful it really is, since counter views are simply censored and people who express them vanished from public view through blacklisting, deplatforming, censorship, and threats. The alt right was becoming enormously popular before they set out using all the tools at their disposal in silencing it. This popularity didnt vanish, it simply got censored.

Younger people do seem noticeably dumber as well as increasingly conformist, but this could have as much to do with dysgenics as propaganda. Jews themselves seem to be getting dumber so its pretty much an across the board dumbing down with Asians being a possible exception. Jews have even had to resort to blatant discrimination against Asians in University admissions in order to maintain their academic dominance as their children fall further behind Asians and can no longer compete.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

If we're having this conversation right now, then clearly it means they are successful. Because the alternative should imply Jews don't control everything, and White people have no one to blame for the current downfall? Tactics like censorship is what every group that is in power use, because they have the means to do so. For example, you would never argue the average Chinese citizen is more powerful than their government. They are censored constantly, but they lack any real power to reverse it (i.e Tiananmen Square protest ended in failure).

On your point about intelligence, if someone can be smart enough to build Hospitals or Railways, why can't they also figure out they will need children to look after them once they get really old? That right there is a contradiction. Keep in mind, building infrastructure are complex activities that require years of thought and creativity. Yet the idea of having children takes less than a second to plan or act out.

Genes that make you successful must be passed from one generation to the next. Otherwise, no smart person can ever be born to begin with, or they all should have died out already.

[–]antireddit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Tactics like censorship is what every group that is in power use, because they have the means to do so.

Not really. Western Europe had free speech throughout the latter half of the 20th century and early 21st century. Anglo ruled America did as well up until very recently when Jews became the dominant power and managed to take over much of the internet.

Genes that make you successful must be passed from one generation to the next. Otherwise, no smart person can ever be born to begin with, or they all should have died out already.

Not sure what point you are making. Intelligence was once extremely important to success in passing on your genes. It isnt today and hasnt been for many generations.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Not really. Western Europe had free speech throughout the latter half of the 20th century and early 21st century. Anglo ruled America did as well up until very recently when Jews became the dominant power and managed to take over much of the internet.

Are you talking unrestricted free speech? That's not true. Canada banned religions like the Jehovahs Witnesses in 1940 and I don't see any ruling that connects it with Jews.

Not sure what point you are making. Intelligence was once extremely important to success in passing on your genes. It isnt today and hasnt been for many generations.

We can't really call these people smart if they fail something so elementary. It begs the question of why would such genes exist in the first place, given that they form an evolutionary dead end.

It would actually put it in the same category as homosexuality, which is regarded as a defect as opposed to something biologically successful.

[–]antireddit 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you talking unrestricted free speech? That's not true. Canada banned religions like the Jehovahs Witnesses in 1940 and I don't see any ruling that connects it with Jews.

Nice strawman. Cherry pick some obscure example from one nation 80 years ago, and then ignore the broader point that white/anglo countries for the most part had free speech up until very recently when Jewish media/internet control and leverage grew to the point they could censor and deplatform critics with impunity and control the narrative.

We can't really call these people smart if they fail something so elementary. It begs the question of why would such genes exist in the first place, given that they form an evolutionary dead end.

From a strictly selfish pov, having children isnt necessarily smart. It requires sacrifice and lots of expense. The seductive appeal of the propaganda were talking about is that it appeals to hedonism and materialism. Who wants to pay for diapers when you could buy a new nintendo switch. Who wants to get married and raise a family when you can hook up on tinder and watch endless internet porn.

By the time people regret the decision not to have kids they are usually too old to do anything about it.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice strawman. Cherry pick some obscure example from one nation 80 years ago, and then ignore the broader point that white/anglo countries for the most part had free speech up until very recently when Jewish media/internet control and leverage grew to the point they could censor and deplatform critics with impunity and control the narrative.

The ruling involved the Supreme Court and even a future Canadian Prime Minister. Not obscure at all.

From a strictly selfish pov, having children isnt necessarily smart. It requires sacrifice and lots of expense. The seductive appeal of the propaganda were talking about is that it appeals to hedonism and materialism. Who wants to pay for diapers when you could buy a new nintendo switch. Who wants to get married and raise a family when you can hook up on tinder and watch endless internet porn. By the time people regret the decision not to have kids they are usually too old to do anything about it.

Going to school requires a lot of sacrifice and expense. So does the act of building a hospital or laying train tracks. I'm sorry but even the hedonist argument doesn't justify intelligent people deciding to commit voluntary suicide. It ignores other arguments like children playing a role in looking after their parents when they become too sick, or even the fact having children offers government tax breaks.

If smart people also want to play video games all day or refuse to change diapers, there exists services meant to cover this. It's called daycare centers or private nannies.