you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The White race has recovered numerous times in history from economic difficulties,what we cannot recover from is irreversible demographic change.It is our job as a movement to convince Whites to sacrifice materialism for values far greater.And no Whites in general did not vote for immigration and diversity. The Hart Cellar act was passed under premise it wouldn't significantly alter demographics, at the time according to polls only 7 percent wanted increased immigration and a much larger number wanted a reduction in immigration.

Speaking of Canada, Justin Trudeau literally ran on a platform calling for the end of a "national" Canadian state and basically embraced the idea he wanted to make the country completely multicultural. He won such election twice, even when there was an explicit anti-immigration party running a few years ago that barely cracked more than 2% of the federal vote. There's no need to focus on Hart-Celler anymore, once the immigration flood gates was opened, White people didn't run another major politician who wanted to stop it, or he never received enough votes to make a difference.

In the 90s there was a referendum in California over granted services to illegal immigrants, the majority voted against in the referendum until a jewish judge overturned the referendum. Look at the UK and the recent Hong Kong horde decision introduced by jew dominic raab, Brits were given no say on this,

This only proves my point. The issue just isn't serious enough otherwise, we should see massive protest in response. Remember the 2003 Iraq War? Technically, George Bush didn't run on a "bomb foreign countries" platform, yet once he did pass such an order, there where protests all over the world calling for the USA to leave. If a bunch of Hong Kongers were known to come to Britain, yet native Brits aren't forming human chains around airports trying to stop them, then it sounds like they may have other issues on their mind. I could use the same example for Australia.

And it is our job to mobilize them,identify the enemies,look long term and act to defend themselves and their children.

George Lincoln Rockwell did this. And so did Enoch Powell. Keep in mind, these men literally existed when their countries where 80% white or more, and yet they still lost to more popular candidates who wanted to end segregation or import immigrants from the colonies.

Again, I have to differ from the Alt-right's belief that White people were always kept in the dark on demographic change or that they're too clueless on their own. You only have to look at the platforms of the two leading parties to see what is their stance on diversity. White nationalism never registers. Alternate parties do exist but like in my Canada example, they barely paved a dent against Trudeau being re-elected twice.

You eventually have to look at the science and understand that these nations now have cultures or social expectations in place that aren't going to deport millions of people or take away their citizenships by force. Especially when minority non-white groups are already on pace to become the next majority, killing any chances of them voting to remove themselves from Canada or the U.S.

[–]Nasser 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Rockwell ran under the Swastika which is a massive idiotic move considering just 20 years ago America was fighting that same ideology.There was significant opposition to desegregation in the US too for example George Wallace in 1968, keep in mind segregation was only really popular in the deep south.The Republicans won the majority of the elections post 1964, so much so the Democrats had to run moderate dems like Carter and Clinton to have a chance of winning.Again you have to understand the psychology and the information received by White Americans at the time that alot of other issues of the time that were focused on like communism and now terrorism.

Powell was popular and he did have influence,I believe him defecting to Labour caused the Tories to lose an election but I can't be sure.He simply failed to capitalize on his popularity an not to mention the Neoliberal American establishment was against him.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Rockwell ran under the Swastika which is a massive idiotic move considering just 20 years ago America was fighting that same ideology.

Wait, someone just told me 90% of U.S Serviceman wanted to join the Axis if segregation ended? If this was still fresh in the heads, they should have ran to Rockwell with open arms and made him President, not turn against the Swastika...

There was significant opposition to desegregation in the US too for example George Wallace in 1968, keep in mind segregation was only really popular in the deep south.

Well then, there's your problem. Unless the South was expected to carry every election, it was only a matter of time before the pro-segregationists would become a minority.

Again you have to understand the psychology and the information received by White Americans at the time that alot of other issues of the time that were focused on like communism and now terrorism.

One does not beget the other. They could have ran a politician who was against both (hence, George Rockwell).

Powell was popular and he did have influence,I believe him defecting to Labour caused the Tories to lose an election but I can't be sure.He simply failed to capitalize on his popularity an not to mention the Neoliberal American establishment was against him.

Then his failure to capitalize on this only doomed his successors since Britain has gotten less White than where it was in the 1970s.

[–]Nasser 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I haven't seen a source for that statistic abut still the average American had every right to hate the swastika, considering Germany declared war on the United States and the US soldiers lost in the war.

Segregation is a thing of it's a time and only would appeal to the people who implemented it.Opposition to mass immigration and multiculturalism can appeal to White's of any region provided they are educated and made aware of it and we are there to guide them.

That was his fault then.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My refutation is mass immigration or multiculturalism already appeals to whites, the same way the newly created Civil Rights Act appealed to WW2 veterans. If they want to stop it, they could do it right now. But millions of Whites could already have non-white friends, or they eat at ethnic restaurants, or they already accepted they're not going to have children for immigration to make a difference in their lives.