Solzhenitsyn's 200 Years Together, Part 1 | Counter-Currents. Spencer J. Quinn makes the case that learning Solzhenitsyn's arguments on the JQ will fortify your arsenal.

submitted by Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist from counter-currents.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PunisherStickerGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

The basis of this article is bad faith. Why would anyone take this seriously? Revisionist / selective historical accounts are desperate ploy.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

elaborate

[–]PunisherStickerGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The article explicitly states that it is cherry picking from a larger historical account.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I've read a bit of 200 years, it's not exactly neutral on Jews, i.e. my impression, assuming Solzhenitsyn was honest, was they were a net pain in the ass for Russia. I think that about sums up my opinion of Jews. I like a lot of them but their net effect on America is extremely negative.

[–]PunisherStickerGuy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

The Tsars are a blundering sore of history. The picture of ineptitude. Any self respecting person would rightfully revolt against those idiots.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

OK, that's ONE country Jews were no problem. Now do the other 108.

[–]PunisherStickerGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Get serious. You do realize the ridiculous nature of your reply? We need to talk specifics not a complete over generalized "what about". Statement.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

OK, let's do specifics. What would you like to discuss?

You seem to be suggesting that Bolshevism was "better than the Tsars" which is a bullshit false dichotomy.

[–]PunisherStickerGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No. Just saying they and the many groups that worked to overthrow the royalty were mainly justified.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Americans overthrew their monarchy and replaced it will something much better, not way fucking worse. That's the difference.