A big flaw about white demographic change that can't be ignored.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yesofcoursenaturally 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not that I think race itself has no importance to this grand conspiracy, it's my belief that race is not necessary to pull it off.

At this point, you're just babbling.

While there is hatred against White people by the media, they are not exactly facing forced government obstacles to make their lives inferior.

Also, no one attempted to assassinate Fidel Castro, because Fidel Castro died of natural causes.

I don't think the comparison to dogs work. How do you breed out "free will" from a Man?

You go from lecturing that the supposed plans of elites to engineer more docile societies are "unscientific", and then cite a completely unscientific concept as a flaw in their plans.

We have to agree to disagree. Leftists probably view you the same way where they believe anyone on the right is completely unredeemable or they don't make positive contributions.

Yeah, this old canard. Two people accuse each other of murder. They must both be murderers. Or neither. It cannot possibly be the case that one is, in fact, a murderer. What would the centrist do then?

I guess a better analogy is progressivism vs conservatism.

It's the same analogy with the same flaws. Progressives get retroactively cast as the positive forces in all ways. Weird how NAMBLA is never described as a progressive organization.

Centrists get elected all the time.

When they do get elected, it's because they do as they're told when pressure is applied. See: Joe Biden. He's actually the perfect example of what "centrism" cashes out to: a senile old man who isn't in control of anything and doesn't mind that much because he'll benefit personally.

And the Western world is where both communism and fascism rose.

Stop seeking out debate with strangers over topics you don't understand and are frankly afraid of thinking about critically as an excuse for a social life. Go on a date or something.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, no one attempted to assassinate Fidel Castro, because Fidel Castro died of natural causes.

Strange comparison, especially given Fidel was just one man and was a threat to his own people. If the government was truly pulling off reverse Apartheid, they're terribly incompetent at it or it has no affect on white lives. Whites still get to own their property or make millions of dollars without going to prison for it. Far from being oppressed or worse, violently genocided.

You go from lecturing that the supposed plans of elites to engineer more docile societies are "unscientific", and then cite a completely unscientific concept as a flaw in their plans.

You are correct I made two different arguments, however, I don't see how the free will of man is unscientific. It's absolutely not possible to breed humans like dogs and expect the same results. You are seriously underestimating humanity if you think we can be forced to act a certain way forever.

If the Elites really want the perfect worker drone, then they're just going to have to scrap using humans all together. Not chaotically mix and match different ethnic groups together like it's LEGO or an Automobile. Human beings have technically been race mixing for thousands of years. Neanderthal genes made their way into Homo Sapien populations. Our evolutionary history and the way we behave just can't be compared to dog breeding.

Yeah, this old canard. Two people accuse each other of murder. They must both be murderers. Or neither. It cannot possibly be the case that one is, in fact, a murderer. What would the centrist do then?

Based off history, I would definitely prefer to label both as murderers. But whoever causes the most aggression/destruction first, I will go against them. Such was the case of WW2, despite the Soviets being just as bad as Germany.

It's the same analogy with the same flaws. Progressives get retroactively cast as the positive forces in all ways. Weird how NAMBLA is never described as a progressive organization.

One organization supports abusing children who cannot consent, whereas the other wanted to stop the abuse of enslaved groups who never asked to be oppressed? Yeah, it's very easy to see how progressivism gets cast as positive if traditional models were fine abusing people...

When they do get elected, it's because they do as they're told when pressure is applied. See: Joe Biden. He's actually the perfect example of what "centrism" cashes out to: a senile old man who isn't in control of anything and doesn't mind that much because he'll benefit personally.

That just sounds like politics in general. No one is really in control because they either don't want to alienate a voting bloc, or they listen to special interest groups.

And the Western world is where both communism and fascism rose.

And where are they today? Communism fell and Fascism hasn't seen a return since the end of WW2.