The Dissident Right/WN obsesses too much over race-mixing. It's really not that big of a deal, IMO.

submitted by AltAlt from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just speculation, but I wonder about the long-term consequences and if mixing

I just debated this recently. The long-term consequences are actually good, think about how early whites mixed with Neanderthals. From them, over time, we selected for the genes that were good, such as for the immune system and discarded ones that weren't. Of course, whites only have 2% Neanderthal DNA on average so the population needs to remain vast majority white to see a net positive benefit in the future.

when one of the parties is African

African's do have some particular genes that could be selected for. A minor example is bone strength:

Osteoporosis has been defined as a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. The clinical consequences of fracture include short- and long-term morbidity as well as increased mortality. Several authors have examined data from the Health Care Financing Administration and noted that fracture risk, particularly risk of hip fracture, is higher in whites than blacks in both sexes

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1863580/

[–]WatchOutThere 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"Oy vey Goyim, race mixing is actually good for you." You're the same guy that supports fags and multiculturalism. You are the last person the DR should be taking optics advice from.

http://imgur.com/a/ndqRU39

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Funny way of saying "I can't refute a single thing you said."

I know you're responding in bad faith but I'm gonna address these anyway:

supports fags

I've never supported them. You're confusing me with someone else.

and multiculturalism

Only to the extent in the US where we've already become multicultural. Even then, I still advocate the white population increase and criminals as well as low IQ minorities be sent elsewhere. I've stated many times Europe should remain white only.

[–]WatchOutThere 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

http://imgur.com/a/ndqRU39

I put this together on /pol/. Science isn't on your side, mate.

Hurr durr better bones!!11! That study was published and commissioned by Jews just so you know.

[–]Nombre27 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This one is interesting. Difference in gestation length in blacks and whites

https://sci-hub.ee/10.1080/03014468600008431

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2292982/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2608264/

https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/33/1/107/668109

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How do you think this refutes anything I said related to how beneficial genes are selected and inferior ones discarded over time, just like what happen when whites mixed with Neanderthals?

No one is arguing a mulatto on average will be inferior to a white. The argument is that when a mulatto mixes with another white and so on, on a large scale, over time the beneficial genes will make their way through while inferior ones are discarded.

For the US example, the best way to do this would be to remove lower IQ minorities that are already here so only the best genes are being contributed to the white race. And as I stated in my original comment:

Of course, whites only have 2% Neanderthal DNA on average so the population needs to remain vast majority white to see a net positive benefit in the future.

[–]Nombre27 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How do you think this refutes anything I said related to how beneficial genes are selected and inferior ones discarded over time, just like what happen when whites mixed with Neanderthals?

You're assuming that the same selection pressures are present, so it's not that it isn't possible but your reasoning seems to be flawed.

Interesting book on Neanderthals and Humans, and I should say that it is highly speculative, is Them and US by Danny Vendramini

https://themandus.org/

Basic premise is that Neanderthal predation was an extremely strong selection pressure for humans that selected for increased intelligence, aggression, etc., and was responsible for a genetic bottleneck.