What is your opinion on these following questions?

submitted by ayotollahsinIran from self.debatealtright

Why do you not want black people in North America but are OK with them being in South America?

Racial differences within humans are tiny, whilst differences between species are greater.

Even if a change in the racial mix of the world happens, so what? Could it just be evolution?

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why do you not want black people in North America but are OK with them being in South America?

This statement is so odd it might as well be just called outright incorrect. Ideally, we don't want blacks in any of our countries - just like we don't want hispanics or other groups that aren't whites. However, most proposals we make include concessions such that blacks dont have to leave north america. Watch this video on the white ethnostate

Most people here are Americans or Europeans so that's the areas we talk about most. South America is more mixed up and hispanic than North America is - but if Uruguay or Argentina decide they want to be white ethnostates then that's cool too.

Racial differences within humans are tiny,

What differences are you talking about? Racial IQ differences for instance are not small.

Even if a change in the racial mix of the world happens, so what?

We care about whites. When you talk about a "change in the racial mix of the world" what you are actually talking about, in practical realistic terms, is Europeans disappearing and being replaced by brown people. That is what is actually happening, and no other races are disappearing like we are. Disguising this as a "change in the racial mix" is dishonest and deprives us of our human rights as a legitimate ethnic group. You wouldn't call a gradual ethnic cleansing of any other people a "change in the racial mix"

What will happen is exactly what is already happening - IQ will drop, crime will increase, and Europeans will be powerless in their homelands as they are abused and taken advantage of by other groups. We will be endlessly maligned as evil and "racist" by our (mostly Jewish) elite ruling class while they import our replacements that will be less intelligent (easier to control b/c they can't organize) and care nothing about our history, values, or cultures.

Also Africa will definitely see an ecological collapse regardless in the near future because of their insane birth rates

Could it just be evolution?

Lower IQs are dysgenic, so no. Race mixing does nothing to help Europeans be more adaptive. It just serves the genocidal divide/conquer strategy of our judeo-coroporate overlords

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lower IQs are dysgenic, so no. Race mixing does nothing to help Europeans be more adaptive.

When white ancestors mixed with Neanderthals to the point where the average white has 2% of their DNA, do you think this was also a dysgenic decision? From them, over time, we selected for the genes that were beneficial such as for the immune system and discarded ones that weren't.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

do you think this was also a dysgenic decision

No for two reasons. First, Neanderthals were well adapted to the Eurasian steppe climate proto-Europeans were moving into, such as lighter skin and hair, and lower body surface area/volume ratio. These adaptations would have been beneficial to invading sapiens to deal with the climate. However, this arrangement was clearly not beneficial to Neanderthals who no longer exist. This is the opposite of what is happening today (or the same, if Europeans are the neanderthals). Invading groups have nothing to offer us. A lot of them are sicker in higher latitudes b/c of vitamin D deficiency and they are obviously lower IQ and more criminal

I don't know if I'd even characterize it as a "decision," because we don't know the circumstances surrounding the hybridization. It could have largely been a rape and conquest event and some genes happened to be retained in modern europeans

we selected for the genes that were beneficial such as for the immune system and discarded ones that weren't.

Yes but this took a very long time to happen, the rate of invasion/hybridization is high enough to cause significant problems now with no obvious future payoff. 2% is also not a lot. If we close the borders, sent no one back, and in 3,000 years modern invaders only contributed 2% of their genome to future European populations then 1) how different would we really be 2) what was the point anyways

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you not want black people in North America but are OK with them being in South America?

There are multiple issues with this question. First off, while some of us hold the opinion that blacks have no place in North America whatsoever and should all be deported back to Africa, a lot of us (myself included) think that it wouldn't be reasonable to kick them out (because they've been living in North America for centuries, and because their ancestors were brought over against their will rather than being invasive immigrants) and instead propose a black ethnostate (if it was up to me in the already black-dominated parts of the Deep South), with returning to Africa remaining voluntary.

Regarding blacks in South America, I only care about the white-dominated parts of South America (Southern Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina and to some degree Chile), from which non-white immigration should be prevented as much as possible, just like with any majority white country. For the non-white parts of Latin America, I personally don't give a damn if blacks want to live there, but I'd totally understand if those countries don't want them either; it's up to the peoples and governments of those countries to decide whether or not to allow in blacks (or any other group of people).

Racial differences within humans are tiny, whilst differences between species are greater.

The differences between humans, chimpanzees and gorillas are also tiny compared to the differences between apes in general and non-apes, so by that logic, why shouldn't we integrate chimpanzees and gorillas into our societies and interbreed with them?

Even if a change in the racial mix of the world happens, so what? Could it just be evolution?

Evolution would imply that the non-whites moving into white nations are conquering us by themselves and/or outsmarting us. Moving into another country because its treasonous government lets you in, just to go on welfare and then pump out 10 babies, most of whom will in turn grow up just to do the same, isn't conquering nor does it require any useful skill (let alone intelligence), in fact it's pure parasitism.

[–]president_camacho 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you not want black people in North America but are OK with them being in South America?

I dont care if blacks live in North America, but the events of the last few years have demonstrated that whites need a nation of their own free from the riots, violence, and constant demonization, and if the black rhetoric is to be believed, they'd be happier living in a nation without whites conspiring to keep them down, so its win win for both.

Racial differences within humans are tiny, whilst differences between species are greater.

So?

Even if a change in the racial mix of the world happens, so what? Could it just be evolution?

Evolution will happen regardless, at issue is that humans are intelligent enough to steer evolution in a direction that benefits us. Currently the dumbest among us have the most kids, by a huge margin. The most intelligent humans have been experiencing negative population growth for quite some time. Combined with overpopulation, that is not sustainable and does not bode well for the future of the human race.

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you not want black people in North America but are OK with them being in South America?

Who says so?