you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

This is very true. Initially I thought humour was the best medicine for any/everything. It keeps it simpler to refrain and keep it civil regarding the shit that can compel them to make a target of SaidIt.

/s/HolocaustSkepticism is an example of best intentions souring.

What the hell, /u/magnora7 and /u/d3rr!!! Why is that sub locked AGAIN!?!

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Agree - but removed your comment because I don't want to even want to call them here

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Not cool.

Not a good enough reason.

They've seen it all before, and partook. This is NOT their first rodeo, and this is far from a problematic discussion thread. So far it's surprisingly civil. This weekend might change it.

The real crime is that that sub with only one post that was embarassing to M7 (he had a meltdown) has been locked yet again.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Alright fine I'll un-remove your comment if you edit it to not actually "mention" them (i.e. remove "/u/")

I don't want this sub to get shut down for any reason

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I'll call M7 any time I get censored by trigger happy mods. This isn't Reddit, and since I don't do bad-faith content I should never be censored (unless I miss a sidebox rule). Before I ever call M7 I give them a chance to correct. I'm hoping you'll reverse it voluntarily.

In the case above, before I was censored, my issue is about the /s/HolocaustSkepticism sub. Before it was locked for no justified reason, the sub had one post, informative as well as dramatic. It's been made private yet again for reasons yet to be explained or justified. I suspect M7 was embarrassed by the drama and/or didn't want to be targeted for a sub as overt as "Holocaust Skepticism", active or not. If not for those reasons then I have no clue why - and I think we deserve a reasonable explanation

Holocaust discussions are not as common as perhaps it should be on this site considering all the "Jews" and "Zionist" content, but it is not new. This particular post is top trending so you're not slipping under anyone's radar. So far, this discussion seems exceptionally good actually.

This conversation will not shut your sub down. Making light of it on a regular basis might. Regardless, if you're this skittish about it all, I recommend you make a new rule outlining and forbidding sensitive topics and create a new sub for them or redirect and/or adopt /s/unpopularopinion, /s/CriticalThoughts, /s/ShowerThoughts, /s/C_S_T, or /s/whatever.

M7 is not Reddit. So far as I know, you have no worries regarding any topic, so long as it's not illegal and the discourse is civil. Maintain the Pyramid Of Debate and you should have no problems. I'm certain M7 will provide warnings if your sub's masses become unruly. SaidIt has seen much worse.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Ok I'll just unremove it

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I may have to retract part of what I said.

I don't pay attention to the drama of SaidIt nor know who is or isn't allowed on /s/all. I was informed that /s/DebateAltRight wasn't formerly on /s/all for some reason(s) and that it's been on /s/all for a while without notice nor nuisance. I also haven't been keeping tabs on the content of the sub. Perhaps M7 is actually very sensitive about Holocaust content for whatever reasons. Perhaps not. He plays it all close to his chest. We may never know.

The rest I stand by. Regardless of which sub, post title, or topic, these conversations have come up before and will again.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's alright but yes that happened and, as you can understandably see, i just don't want to stir up any unnecessary drama with the admins.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why did it happen?

It's obvious that SaidIt has more right refugees, so in fairness and balance it seems rational to limit the right representation on the front page to avoid becoming exclusively right like Voat.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't remember. But I'm happy he un-quarantined us. Could be we dominated /all when the bulk of the refugees arrived.

rational to limit the right representation

Right