Nick Fuentes banned on Dlive

submitted by arainynightinskyrim from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Wrangel 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

People are so stuck in internet thinking that they can't imagine organizing without it. Every political movement in history did it and many were far more persecuted that us. We face nothing compared to the Reds in Tsarists Russia, the dissidents in Poland in the 80s or any other historical movement that succeeded. The system has actually been very nice to us. Being kicked off the internet might even be good, people think they are doing something when few people change their mind because of a twitter comment.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

People are too afraid of persecution. They lack the balls to go to prison or get into a firefight with the cops or military. Men nowadays just lack balls thanks to low testosterone induced by lack of physical labor and estrogen in the food supply

[–]Nasser 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Aren't you aswell? What good can you do for the White race in a jail cell or coffin?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'm not saying go to prison. I'm saying the fear of going to prison shouldn't dissuade you from real activism. Hitler always risked getting imprisoned, killed in prison or killed in the streets or his bed. It didn't dissuade him from fighting for his cause

[–]Nasser 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Implying I follow or look up to Hitler.

But here's the thing in Weimar Germany the courts and big business were sympathetic and supportive of the Nazi's. That's the reason Hitler got such a lenient sentence after the Munich coup attempt aswell as the reason the President appointed him chancellor. Weimar Germany also didn't have surveillance or social media witch hunt mobs. We have to adapt to our current circumstances.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No they weren't. Big busines was controlled by Jewish interests and the Nazis were banned by the courts repeatedly. The reason he was let out and the bans were lifted because of the threat of Nazi terrorism and mass street protests. Violence works, contrary to what conservative cuckolds believe. The authorities weren't able to keep the Nazis down for the same reason the liberals in hollywood don't make fun of Islam or Muhammad. The threat of mass violence.

[–]Nasser 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Hard disagree.I've studied the period in history and nearly every other historian could verify what I've said.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

ye libtards larping as marxists pretending that the nazis were just given power by the people already in power, in reality they were massively popular with the people but not the powerful obviously because they were a revolutionary movement that were going to take over the state. why would someone in power support people who are going to take their power from them? use your brain

[–]Nasser 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Most of the government and institutions of Weimar were comprised of the remnants of the Imperial elite. These elites turned to Hitler due to fear of Communism.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

they hated him lol, they offered no support to him on his way into power and did nothing but cause trouble while he was in power to the point of sabotaging the war effort and trying to assassinate him like 100 times