So now Richard Spencer is counter-signaling Keith Woods?

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Richard should air out his 'critiques' in cozy streams and real life discussions that have the air of respect and mutual good faith debate.

Twitter on the other hand is a social media site geared to cater to coordinated reputation attacks, and getting followers to engage in similar stunts. If Richard wants dissidents to respect and follow him he shouldn't 'critique' right using twitter or other such platforms. Twitter should exclusively be used for being critical of mainstream left and right. Richard constantly acts like his ego and follower count are more important than the cause of white nationalism/survival/sovereignty.

[–]Dashing-Dove 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Richard 100% has an ego, but he usually has fair points as well. He wasn't even particularly rude. Calling a statement trite and meaningless shouldn't be so triggering. Keith is a big boy and can handle it - which he did, in a civil fashion. As far as the suitability of platforms for discussion, I will agree that Twitter ranks at the bottom. Unfortunately, people are driven to type where there are eyes to view it, no matter the character limit.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I find it suspicious that Spencer is till on Twitter.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He has been banned before. He doesn't post anything overtly controversial and twitter has the most lenient standards of all the major social media sites.