Communist women have totally surprising fantasies

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from (self.debatealtright)

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheHinduDindu/status/1340722444861095939

all 25 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This isn't news at all. SJW girls - especially the PoC ones - love white alpha males, particularly the "Nazi" boys. They all scream how much they hate us, but they secretly want us to bang their brains out. Women want to sexually submit themselves to strong, good looking, and confident men. No amount of feminist indoctrination will change that.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ironically the media has made nazis hotter. They're violent terrorists and conquerors who wage war on the Liberal consensus.

In contrast, Liberal men are polite, gentle and peaceful, like sheep

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women love "bad boys" and we are the ultimate "bad boys" in the liberal West.

[–]sylla94 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Take the Chud pill

[–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Came here to post this, LMAO

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Golden one for President

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    It would be better to literally give away the Presidency to a random Scandinavian bodybuilder than give the choice to millions of highly-informed US citizens. We need a Lookocracy.

    It would be better to give the Presidency to a random high IQ Scandinavian rather than a random Scandinavian bodybuilder. There is a small correlation between above average IQ and attractiveness in the US, and a moderate one in the UK, but many geniuses are actually pretty ugly. We should give our presidential candidates IQ tests.

    In the United Kingdom, attractive children are more intelligent by 12.4 IQ points (r = .381), whereas in the United States, the correlation between intelligence and physical attractiveness is somewhat smaller (r = .126).

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289610001315

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Incel tv did a video where he showed that looks are the no 1 predictor of intelligence for men

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    no 1 predictor of intelligence for men

    Might be (besides an IQ test of course), but it's still a small to moderate correlation with IQ as the study suggests. Which means there's going to be a lot of ugly people with a high IQ still.

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    The young handsome photos of Stalin are fakes.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Really?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It was the Soviets that pioneered Photoshop techniques IRL. Stalin had severe scarring due to smallpox, which was airbrushed, but I don't think they altered the bone structure or anything like that.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    If Stalin was 6 feet, women would have made shrines to him

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They do though.

    [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    Antifa girls are built for big chud cock.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EptFg1NXIAsrQwE?format=jpg&name=large

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Lol!

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    This is reality

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This is reality

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Give them two months of dating and she'll be a Rush Limbaugh listener. Hopefully then she's addicted to the taboo and sees a good looking WN and is listening to Lincoln-Rockwell instead.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    She needs to pump out white kids.

    [–]MATKINS 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Why do people believe everything they read on the internet? Especially random anonymous reddit posts?

    Not only is the person not a "communist" but it's probably not even a female. It's a Republican male. Probably a fat MAGAtard boomer who imagines himself to be a Chad or some homosexual.

    Here are some giveaways.

    "far left" - they don't call themselves this, just as most of us don't call ourselves "far-right" (at least those that our enemies malign as "far-right", cucky lolberts have embraced this label apparently)

    The description of the conservative man and the fantasy itself sounds like something out of gay porn.

    Women are certainly attracted to the kind of men described, but they don't articulate it like that.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    "far left" - they don't call themselves this, just as most of us don't call ourselves "far-right"

    That's false.

    [–]MATKINS 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I used to be involved in anarchist and socialist circles when I was younger, never met anyone who called themselves "far left." As someone now on the other side, I encounter Antifascist types a lot, they don't call themselves "far-left" either. Some will call themselves "radical" even, but not "far left."

    I've been in WN/ethnonationalism for 7 years, I can think of only one person who unironically embraces the "far-right" title. People instead called themselves Alt-Right, Dissident Right, New Right, etc. FRENs doesn't count as it's ironic.

    I'm sure you can go on social media and cherrypick a few cases, but as a rule, it's people from the other side who call their enemies "far X" because the label itself is supposed to imply you are too marginal or extreme to take seriously.

    [–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I embrace the label "far-right" and encourage all right-wingers to do so. Hard-line radical right-wingery; thst is the way!

    [–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Does anyone have the reddit thread archived?