To atheist/agnostic alt-righters

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dashing-Dove 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It's genetically degenerate (duh, no reproductive impulse), but unless actively encouraged by society, isn't a problem, because the percentage of the population that's actually homosexual is sub-10%. Morally degenerate? No. I have absolutely nothing against people who fall into the category and prefer the same gender (I am one of them), but the community in the West has gone beyond gaining equal rights to suggest warping children with hormone therapy, inculcating them with sex ed far too young, destroying traditional gender roles and the family unit, etc. These have negative effects on the broader population, leading to weaker adults who are less well-adjusted and more prone to mental & identity problems, and also likelier to support leftist political policies for social reasons.

Basically, people in 3rd world shitholes should push for the human rights they lack, and people in Western countries should accept the equal rights they already possess, without trying to dominate the culture and shove their sexuality in everyone's face, then carry on with their lives exactly as they wish to live it. They'll have no trouble from me. Oh, and I don't particularly care about marriage - just don't force pastors to perform them, because that is infringement upon religious rights. Find a church that genuinely supports you and your partner instead.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

push for rights where they don't exist (3rd world shitholes)

This is Zionist cultural imperialism.

[–]Dashing-Dove 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How is it Zionist or imperialistic? The people there should fight for whatever rights they wish to have, especially when they're being actively persecuted and can be executed, mutilated, or tossed into prison over their sexuality. If you mistook that line of mine as a suggestion for the US and other Western countries to dictate social policy by economic or military pressure, NO. I'm rewording it.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

especially when they're being actively persecuted and can be executed, mutilated, or tossed into prison over their sexuality.

This is rarely the case, though. Far more often it's a case of media misrepresentation. Like with the "Kill the Gays" bill in Uganda, which permits execution as a punishment strictly in the case of forcible/drug rape of a same-sex child under the age of 14 (where such activity was already punishable by execution for heterosexuals).

[–]Dashing-Dove 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The Ugandans sure have a knack for awfully misleading bill titles. It's also damning of their legislature and overall society that a bill was named Kill the Gays over Kill the Rapists, as if executing homosexuals has greater moral credence or popularity than, you know, preventing the rape of minors. (edit note: bill isn't named Kill the Gays. Thank shitlib media for the misrepresentation)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Kill the Gays" is the exonym invented by the Jewish media, intended to activate the Holocaust narrative programming.

[–]Dashing-Dove 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I did some quick research and you're correct. Kill the Gays was never used by the Ugandans, but by Western media. The bill is still called Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014. While not as bloodthirsty, it sends a resoundingly literal anti-homosexual message, and I wouldn't fault people there for protesting against that language regardless of the bill's actual intent. That's for them to decide, however, and it might not be worth the cost of incurring actual persecution by raising a fuss.