PART 2

The Georgetown ‘Jesuit’, Propaganda due (P2) crowd, that people like to call Catholics, are not Catholics. QUESTION: Why is it that Talmudic Pope Francis (Bergoglio) hangs out with Rothschild and Talmudic rabbis as well as Freemasons! Why is is that the masons signed an anti-JFK pact between P2 lodge and ZioFascists in Israel? Could that be why traditional Catholics are excommunicated from the church if they mention that Israel LLC. had anything to do with 9/11.

Nowadays, out of nowhere, a powerful sect in the Catholic church would emerge out of Vatican 2 – ‘catholics’ who love Freemasons – when for 400 years it was a gross sin to be even affiliated with Freemasonic rites and rituals. Propaganda due, the CIA and Zionists aligned with the Likud killed JFK, a Catholic. The OP in the post above tries to tell you that the JFK assassination was a hoax to try to cover for Israel.

Kennedy wanted to appoint J.W. Fullbright. Schlesinger Jr. writes:

"Elizabeth Farmer told me this evening that, at five this afternoon, it looked as if it would be Rusk in State, with Bowles and Bundy as Undersecretaries. (Ken, by the way, told me that Jack had called him on the 7th and talked seriously about Mac as Secretary.) I asked why Rusk had finally emerged. Elizabeth said, 'He was the lowest common denominator.' Apparently Harris Wofford succeeded in stirring the Negroes and Jews up so effectively that the uproar killed Fulbright, who was Jack's first choice."

Michael Collin Piper writes:

Fullbright was for the United Nations at the time and was a signatory to the Southern Manifesto. Fulbright also opposed McCarthyism (think Roy Cohn) and the House Un-American Activities Committee and later became known for his opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam War. His efforts to establish an international exchange program eventually resulted in the creation of a fellowship program which bears his name, the Fulbright Program.

Fulbright claimed that $5 million tax-deductible from philanthropic Americans was sent to Israel and then recycled back to the U.S. for distribution to organizations seeking to influence public opinion in favor of Israel.[61] That statement led to friction with organized pro-Israeli groups in the U.S.

Frustration with the ability of the Zionist Organization of America and other Zionist lobby groups to influence senators with their campaign contributions led Fulbright to retort on Face the Nation on April 15, 1973, "Israel controls the U.S. Senate." "The Senate is subservient to Israel, in my opinion much too much. We should be more concerned about the United States interest rather than doing the bidding of Israel. This is a most unusual development."

Perhaps his most notable case of dissent was his public condemnation of foreign and domestic policies, in particular, his concern that right-wing radicalism, as espoused by the John Birch Society and the wealthy oilman H. L. Hunt, had infected the U.S. military. (The JBS also pushes Zionism.) He was, in turn, denounced by Republican Senators J. Strom Thurmond and the Zionist Jew Barry Goldwater. Goldwater and Texas Senator John Tower announced that they were going to Arkansas to campaign against Fulbright, but Arkansas voters re-elected Fulbright.

Fullbright also was concerned about the Zionists situated around McCarthy. McCarthy was targeting some of America’s old-line families and their associates in the foreign policy establishment.

And it is probably no coincidence that one of McCarthy’s most prominent targets—former Gen. George C. Marshall—was actually one of the most outspoken American critics (during the Truman administration) of the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel.

What is particularly interesting is that Ann Coulter—one of the current “neo-conservatives” whose ideological sponsors and patrons are modern-day standard bearers of the old-line Leo Strauss Trotskyite banner (now posing as “neo-conservatism”)—basically concurs with Viereck’s assessment, saying in her recent book, Treason:

McCarthy’s real “victims” were not sympathetic witnesses, frivolous Hollywood screenwriters, or irrelevant blow-hard college professors. They were elite WASP establishment policymakers . . .They were well-born and looked good in dinner jackets . . . .In other words, although Viereck was a McCarthy critic and Coulter one of McCarthy’s defenders, both assert (quite correctly) that—con- trary to the popular image of McCarthy being a “vicious anti-Semitic” hatemonger who was harassing innocent Jewish Hollywood screenwriters”—McCarthy was instead—in the broader sense—effectively taking aim in another direction altogether, thereby muddying the picture of the real sources of subversion in America.

Fulbright's career was somewhat stunted, with its influence never matching its luminescence. For all his seniority and powerful committee posts, he was not considered part of the Senate's inner circle of friends and power brokers. He seemed to prefer it that way: the man who Freemason Harry S. Truman had called an "overeducated SOB" was, in the words of Clayton Fritchey, "an individualist and a thinker," whose "intellectualism alone alienates him from the Club" of the Senate.

On July 11, 1973, during a speech at an American Bankers Association meeting, Fulbright criticized Capitol Hill attempts to block trade concessions to the Soviet Union until it allowed the emigration of Jews and other groups:

"Learning to live together in peace is the most important issue for the Soviet Union and the United States, too important to be compromised by meddling — even idealistic meddling — in each other's affairs."

This was what former CIA director Smith and then JFK and now Fulbright believed. That the military should only be used when all diplomatic options are used up and only when the nation, more specifically, its people are threatened with great harm. The neocon/Zionist propaganda due crowd aligned with the CIA felt otherwise. That detente and diplomacy were weakness.

Therefore, although McCarthy was very much correct, it seems, in pointing out that there were indeed “communists in the government,” it is probably safe to say that the war that was being fought out on Capitol Hill during the McCarthy hearings and in the media was actually hardly more than an overflow, into the United States, of the long-standing war between the surviving Russian Nationalist Communist elements in the Soviet Union (formerly led by Josef Stalin) and their bitter enemies in the Jewish-Zionist-Trotskyite movement which was now ensconced on American soil.

Truman was a Freemason; Gigliotti, a Protestant Freemasonic Zionist preacher who mingled with the Likudniks had convinced Truman to fire former CIA director Smith because he made the CIA a mere caricature of what Gigliotti thought it should be. That it is its own military. Hence, JFK ‘s statement that the CIA should be splintered into a thousand pieces. He was refering here to the pro-interventionist, pro-psychological warfare CIA.

Michelle Metta writes:

On July 7, 1960, an alliance agreement was signed in Rome between US Freemasons and Grande Oriente, the most high-profile Italian community of Freemasons. At the signing ceremony, two men represented Italy: Antonio Trabucchi, a member of the Italian government, and Publio Cortini, the Grand Master of the Italian Freemasonry. The United States were represented by the Ambassador James Zellerbach and by a certain aforementioned Frank B. Gigliotti. https://www.amazon.co.uk/ITALIAN-UNDERCOVER-MOSSAD-STATION-ASSASSINATION/dp/1719822662/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1569652539&refinements=p_27%3AMichele+Metta&s=books&sr=1-1

Apparently, the event had no mysterious connotations. However, years later it became clear not only that Gigliotti was a CIA extremely powerful agent, but also that this ceremony had secret clauses, the first of which was to stop John Kennedy from becoming POTUS. But in order to complete the argument, we should move on to January 24, 2011, when Bruno Rozera was interviewed by L’Espresso, a well-known Italian weekly magazine. Rozera was a top member of P2. P2 was an ultra-secret Italian Freemasonic lodge not only deeply connected to CMC, but also to the Unorthodox warfare the Stay-Behind network is based on. The crux of the matter is that Rozera reveals in his interview that the organizer of the anti-JFK Gigliotti’s mission in Italy was Giuseppe Pièche. An eminent general under Mussolini, Pièche, after WWII, became an equally eminent figure of the Unorthodox warfare against communism under the auspices of NATO and the CIA. In fact, Pièche, with the full complicity of the then Italian Interior Minister, Scelba, created and directed an entity, ServizioAntincendi. He was helped in this venture by a soon-to-be member of P2, Edgardo Sogno, who, in the 1990s, made several public declarations in which he himself clearly qualified this Antincendias a NATO project linked to the Stay-Behind network. So, there was a fascist occultist masonic and Zionist element against JFK simply because he wasn’t hard enough on communism and also because he was a Catholic, against the war, and fervently against Israel’s nuclearization.

Metta also exposes Bloomfields connection to the crime and so there exposes a Mossad connection.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mettacmc/45405649974

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mettacmc/45405501734