White Identity and Eastern Europe - American Renaissance. Inspiring White Pill.

submitted by Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist from (amren.com)

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Francis Parker Yockey was right. Communism defended Eastern Europe from degeneracy and ethnic cleansing. The Soviet Union was the good guy in the Cold war.

Its ironic that Hitler thought the Soviets as the main threat and Anglos as potential allies. In 1945, there were only 50 German Divisions defending the West against the Americans and 214 divisions in the East. If it had been the reverse, the Soviets would've taken over all of Germany and today a united 80 million strong pure Germany would be as based as Poland and Hungary.

Hitler made a grievous error. He thought that the Anglos being Germanic kin would be more sympathetic and kind to the conquered German people than the more alien Slavs...boy did he mix that up. Much is made of the Soviet rapes and murders on Germans, but I wonder what degree of depravities the American army did, it was filled with Jewish spies and their marxist shabbos.

What's even more hilarious is that the Soviet Union which was supposed to bring about the one world order and be Jewry's mob enforcer of Asia ended up thwarting the NWO. The one world government was supposed to happen in 1946, when the Anglo-Americans proposed that all nuclear weapons be handled by an International Atomic Agency.

International anything means rule by Jewish bankers and their anglo servants. He who controls the nukes, controls the world

The UK and US were eager to go along with it. Stalin blocked it because he didn't want to hand over Russian sovereignty to the UN. Thus, Joseph Stalin, one of the most evil men in history, ended up saving the planet from one world Jewish government. God does work in strange ways.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Striker said it best, he said communism forces the population to throw away their traditions and stuff so they often keep them in secret whereas capitalism encourages people to voluntarily destroy their souls for hedonism and whatnot. The death by a thousand cuts/slow acting poison of liberalism and capitalism has proven far more harmful than the brutality of communism. All the ex-communist countries now are in a much better place spiritually and culturally than the ones who were liberal capitalist. Also another thing to point out it was only really the initial bolsheviks who were basically just radical liberals who hated god and shit, Stalin brought back the Orthodox church, banned abortion, gay shit etc.

Also another thing is after the war people in Eastern Europe rose up and got rid of the jews and Stalin kicked them out of power in the USSR in the early 50s before he died (Yockey predicted all of this would happen by the way). From this point onwards the communist countries were pretty much all just white ethnostates. Communist east Germany protected their white population and were pro-natalist whilst the west German capitalists were the typical anti-white bullshit and importing immigrants rather than encouraging child-reaing. One of the leaders of the USSR sent a letter to an American president talking about how to preserve and protect white people and shit like this etc.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stalin brought back the church to inspire patriotism in Russians during ww2. He knew that no one would want to die for marxism. He never banned abortions but he did clamp down on faggotry and whoring

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Its ironic that Hitler thought the Soviets as the main threat and Anglos as potential allies.

That's a myth. Read Hitler: A Global Biography by Brendan Simms. Uncle Dolf knew Anglo finance was the biggest long-term threat.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then why dud he try to ally with them against the reds? Why was the bulk of german forces stationed on the east?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you read my comment? I said long-term threat. The USSR was a short-term threat. That's why.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The reality is that it is the lower living standards that keeps the East more "based". However this is slowly changing and the East isn't looking like such a stronghold many think it is.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't buy that. Living standards in the West have been declining for years and it's only become more insane. If anything the insanity has accelerated ever since living standards went in reverse. Or look at China, were the opposite happened. Their living standards have gone up the last ten years, and during that time they've literally started to crush degeneracy.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Historically speaking and compared to the rest of the the West is still extremely prosperous and far wealthier than the East- https://i.redd.it/7z2or5q4dh121.jpg

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Intermarium is a great idea, but ideally we should have a pan-Europeanist order.