you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Agreed. Supporting the cartoonish version of what the liberal world order wants you to believe is a 'Nazi' absolutely is anti white.

Hitler could have used patience and long-term diplomacy instead,

You have a very poor understanding of the events leading to WWII.

https://altrighthistoryoftheus.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/5/1/37514239/published/newspaper-judea.jpg?1486152643

(Notice the date on that publication)

[–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

That is interesting. Do you think peaceful deportation of jews was impossible after that point, 1933? And do you think Germans wanted to wage the war primarily because of jews?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Do you think peaceful deportation of jews was impossible after that point

No. Jewry was assisting Hitler in Peaceful deportation. See: Haavara Agreement. When you declare war on someone you obviously want your people out of the war zone. The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution. Germany, US, UK and Jewish elites knew that tech advancement was shrinking the world and international trade was a powerful weapon that was quickly becoming a king maker (specializing meant that with the swipe of a pen you could starve an entire nation by cutting it off from world trade). WWII was a Globalist vs Nationalist war and Traditionalism/truth vs Hedonism/liberalism. WWIII is going to be a similar fight.

And do you think Germans wanted to wage the war primarily because of jews?

No. Jew hate was actually relatively new in Germany. Germany wasn't attacked because it realized Jews betrayed Germany and openly called them out. It was attacked because it was the only significant sovereign power standing in the way of the central banker take over of the world. Central bankers need mental control over people through total control of narrative and Germany as a bearer of truth, traditionalism, and morality opposed that. Central banking isn't just about Jewish power. It's about a whole host of hedonic people and minions of Jewish ideology. It's about blood lines and european occultism. It's a very old fight.

[–]marc_gee[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the lesson. Do you think it would have been better for Germany to peacefully deport all jews and not have any wars? Germany could have avoided wars, I think we can agree.

Did Germany really have white people's best interests at heart by fighting the war, or only German interests? Was it better for Germany to kill millions of whites to try to free Europe from jewish power and consolidate central banking power? Couldn't this be considered anti-white? Did conquering Russia, France, and Poland show value towards the non-German whites who had to suffer and die? The value that alt-rightism tries to have for our people.

Imagine how much a jew-free Germany without wars could have done in the long run to peacefully relocate jews living all over Europe. If you believe a conspiracy that jews would have bankrupt Germany if they didn't wage the war, can you prove it?

These are just questions to consider, you don't have to answer them all.

[–]IRONICALLY_A_NAZI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the whites are going against their own interest, it's not anti-white to kill the enemy against your providence.

Wars amongst europeans is completely natural, it just so happens in this case the Allies were on the wrong side of the war and Germany had to show tough love to attempt to save Europe.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. Jewry was assisting Hitler in Peaceful deportation. See: Haavara Agreement. When you declare war on someone you obviously want your people out of the war zone. The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution. Germany, US, UK and Jewish elites knew that tech advancement was shrinking the world and international trade was a powerful weapon that was quickly becoming a king maker (specializing meant that with the swipe of a pen you could starve an entire nation by cutting it off from world trade). WWII was a Globalist vs Nationalist war and Traditionalism/truth vs Hedonism/liberalism. WWIII is going to be a similar fight.

You forgot one thing. The world empires were run by International Finance, Germany and Italy weren't a part of International Finance. The bankers don't ultimately care who is in power when the choice is Britain, France, Russia, America because they have control over the economy of all of them. The bankers had no say in Germany and Italy which was the real issue. /u/marc_gee

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Schacht was definitely an International banker and a self-admitted freemason. Hitler booted him in the late 1930's.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes Schacht had basically no autonomy though, he did what Hitler told him and he constantly bitched and moaned about it lol.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

JEWRY

No, Zionist Jewry and Shabbos Goy Zionism was assisting Hitler. Diaspora Jews had no intention of leaving for Israel.

125,000 Jews fought for the Reich.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fight was less about Jews in Germany and more about who was going to control continental Europe and influence world trade/tech/law. Who was going to set the tone for the next 100 years of the industrial and tech revolution.

Agreed!