you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Trump77 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Saving Europe?

Look at Europe now.

[–]Trump77 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Its better than Eastern Europe being mass genocided and being stuck under the Fascist jackboot.

[–]WatchOutThere 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The Germans didn't view the Slavs as inferior. That myth comes from a passage in Mein Kampf where Hitler briefly mentioned how he disliked their architecture. This type of banter was very common back then. Hitler was also in a better position than others to say this because he was painter who specialized in architecture.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

They did view the overall genetic stock of Eastern Europe as inferior, they did not however view Slavs as "subhuman" or plan to exterminate them. It is not irrational to consider Germanic/Nordics as the supreme genetics of the Aryan race even if they are the biggest cucks today. They are the weakest today because they create the nicest most prosperous nations. I say this as a Irish/Sicilian American mutt so I am not biased.

It may be a controversial opinion but I believe the best option for the future of Europe would be to integrate more Germanic genes into the East and South of Europe. Germanic genes exist throughout Europe, some areas more than others. Northern Italians are basically Germanic/Med mixes, Czechs are Germanic/Slavs, and the Baltic Slavs are basically Nordic Slavs. It should be like this throughout Europe. Of course this isn't the important issue right now but if Europe ever reverses its decline I would like to see it happen.

[–]WatchOutThere 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Would you say the British are Celtic-Germanic?

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yea

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Scotland is mostly celtic with some Nordic imput. Eastern and Southern Engalnd is heavily Germanic. Western England is very Celtic as is Wales. East Anglia is the most Nordic place in England becasue it was settled by the vikings. York was also settled by them in some number. But the most German settlement came in South Eastern England.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Czechs are very slavic with little Geramnic input. The population stayed apart. North Italians have some German input but not a lot. Baltic peoples are neither slavs or Nordic. They're balts(Lituania and Latvia) or Finno-Ugrics(Estonians). Estonians have Nordic blood because of Swedish colonialism. The balts are an insulated population who's language bears strong resemblance to Sansrkit.

Spain had a little German input due to the Vandals. The nations in Europe that can truly considered to be strongly Nordic are the German lands, the low countries, Britain and Northern France. Germans were expelled en masse from Eastern Europe following WW2. Most Germans in Russia either fled to the US, Brazil or Germany.

I understand the admiration for the nordics. They have an ability to make extremely prosperous and high functioning society. But one has to wonder if they are too nice to survive in this world. They are too individualistic and way too conformist and social. In a globalized world, you need tribalism to survive. A solution might be a Slavic-Nordic mix race. One that has high IQ and a reasonable level of tribalism and racism.