you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

...

I hate to keep telling you this, but let me just say: three years ago, I was the first person banned from everything on the internet. The media called for my ban. I wouldn’t have been banned if it wasn’t for the media. They said: “This is a special case, this man is a neo-Nazi and a white supremacist, he must be silenced, we need to make a special rule just for him.”

Now – a mere three years later – they are openly frothing at the mouth, demanding the President of the United States be silenced for “disinformation.” They have decided what is true, therefore, being the arbiters of truth, and the ones who determine the nature of reality itself, they are in a position to decide what you think.

...

[–]marc_gee 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

However it is good. We need conservatives to be banned so they will fight the system.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, we need to enforce the First Amendment. I'm not anywhere near ready to just ignore the arguably most important law in America just because our enemies do. What we need to do is sue the fuck out of anyone that dares to violate our civil rights.

[–]marc_gee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Conservatives getting banned is one possible way the first amendment could become enforced on social media.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I suppose maybe. I've just got a knee jerk reaction against a rash of "First Amendment is for children" theme around here lately. IMO without 1A there is NO freedom or control of your own destiny beyond solitude.