Living intergenerationally

submitted by DisgustResponse from self.debatealtright

It's been nothing but a relentless torrent of blackpills these past few days, and it's very tempting to give in to despair, but I wanted to remind everyone of our ace-up-the-sleeve, why victory is inevitable, but we must be patient.

What we have that the enemy lacks is the desire and ability to live intergenerationally. We celebrate and learn from our ancestors. They castigate theirs. We love our families and children and want the best future for them. They view family as an obstacle and children as a burden. Their struggle is material and temporal. Ours is spiritual and eternal. Generalizations maybe, but true in the aggregate.

If it hasn't been beaten into your head already, improving your own condition with the aim of starting a big, loving family in a conscientious, like-minded community is the most important thing you can do for yourself and the movement. It's not merely about out-reproducing them, but that traditional systems, modes and beliefs are necessarily eugenic, having already been tested and selected by the ages. We WILL endure.

Leftists will smugly insist that none of this matters because they will brainwash your children. This might be true, to an extent, but just like a virus, once enough of the population is inoculated, it will flame out. After all, you grew up in the most totalitarian era of ideological brainwashing every day of your life from school/media/pop culture, and you still had the will to reject its lies.

I will still follow politics, and there are certainly some important fights to be had coming up, but I expect no further catharsis in my lifetime remotely on the level Trump 2016 was. Slowly, though, the way things are going, our great-grandchildren will be poised to claw back the rot and inherit the Earth.

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]DisgustResponse[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if the dissident right completely burns out as a political movement, is deleted off the Internet, and we all die childless in prison, I still believe that tradition and the old ways will prevail in the long run.

[–]marc_gee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The altright has been just as anti-boomer as liberals have, is that respect for your elders?

The statistics on interracial marriage show there is no hope:

At the national level, 0.4% of marriages were interracial in 1960, 2.0% in 1980,[42] 12% in 2013,[43] and 16% in 2015, almost 50 years after Loving.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia#For_interracial_marriage

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Most interracial relationships whites are a part of are with Hispanics who are already 60-70% white.

    Are you saying most Hispanics that are mestizos are 60-70% white? The only other people I know in the US who are 60-70% white on average would be mulattos, the child when African-Americans being 20-30% white mixes with someone who is white. Is the offspring of a mulatto and a Caucasian also considered white to you then?

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Nombre27 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Worth looking at the source of that claim as it doesn't show the whole picture.

      https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/interactives/intermarriage-across-the-u-s-by-metro-area/

      It's a limited data set of only metropolitan areas and includes all forms of intermarriage. Whites are the lowest percentile of the four races includes.

      Metro area Total % intermarried Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians
      United States 16 10 18 26 29

      Thus without more data, I don't think think the trends of metropolitan areas should be extrapolated to the rest of the country.

      [–]marc_gee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Thanks for the deeper look. If 10% of whites are intermarrying each generation, how long before 80% of the white gene pool is gone?

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      White DNA isn't really gone into oblivion once race mixed though. Also account for those marrying back into whites after 1-2 generations.

      [–]marc_gee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      I would respectfully disagree; mostly white is still not white and purity should be saved.

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      purity should be saved

      This is true, but when it comes down to people who will help you and the white race in the long run you could count on people who are 70-85% white like the castizo Nick Fuentes which comes to mind.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        The future for whites lies in Europe, America will become a failed state like Mexico with maybe a few white pockets living an isolated and simple life.

        [–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Face the reality of history. Many cultures simply died out. Why couldn't the same happen here?

        Another possibility is being bred into submission. This is what happened in China where over time the will to resist was culturally and genetically bred out of the population.

        Those groups that survived in the face of oppression were those that were willing to move to save themselves. I am particularly thinking of Jews and Anabaptists. If you want your culture and your genes to survive, leave America and move somewhere where this will be possible.