all 56 comments

[–]sylla94 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

why are people upvoting this dog shit

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (15 children)

what are you going to do instead? cope some more about le orange man and go to some cringey protest with a bunch of Q-believing boomer women and geriatrics who love israel? post le epik meme threads on /pol/ about how trump can still win and if your random numbers are a certain way he will win because le epik kekistani?

[–]sylla94 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

imagine giving up the very moment the media says that biden won. it has not even been officially called with several states still counting or about to be recounted/canvased/audited. the evidence of fraud is incontrovertible and continually overwhelming with the supreme court already making demands against corrupted states. trump has what, 2 more months in office? and is refusing to concede with half the populace enthusiastically supporting him.

take ur blackpilled demoralization shilling elsewhere

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]sylla94 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    fuentes and stuff? they're great and actually doing something

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

    The trusted Berg and Steins have said Orange Man Bad, man. Give up already.

    This theater has exposed many on the "Far Right". Remember TMoF? AMLO Man Bad refuses to endorse the Big Guy.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Exposed us as what? Not GOP shills? Nationalists have been openly anti-Neoconservative since forever.

    You guys thought you were like us because you call yourself 'patriotic' or 'nationalist' but what you mean is that you mindlessly support kikes. You were never one of us. Nationalists fight for their people, not their oppressors.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    You and "your people" are going to get spayed and microchipped if they even make it that far after they give you all COVID21.

    Even if the Zionald is just "the other Biden", how is it not better if they are fighting each other?

    What are you or Spencer or whomever going to do to keep Merkel, Gates and the others at bay?

    I'll personally wash Bibi's underwear. (edit: maybe not as it doesn't seem to work for Trump either.)

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    You and "your people" are going to get spayed and microchipped if they even make it that far after they give you all COVID21.

    Why the fuck would anyone microchip you when they already listen to everything you say through your phone, have your social medias and browser cookies? They know everything about all of us and can get it at will.

    Even if the Zionald is just "the other Biden", how is it not better if they are fighting each other?

    It's not better or worse for us, it's simply irrelevant. Regardless of the outcome our destiny is tied to neither of the mainstream parties and both of them are equally opposed to us as well as being equally under the control of jewish orgs that actually exercise power. We have to work with whatever happens regardless of externalities.

    What are you or Spencer or whomever going to do to keep Merkel, Gates and the others at bay?

    Nothing unless we get power which is what nationalists need to be focused on instead of schizophrenic conspiracy theories and simping for people who hate us.

    I'll personally wash Bibi's underwear.

    Not surprised

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Power. What a cope.

    What do you think the uncontested all-seeing World government will let you grab exactly? Not guns, not votes, not land, not books.

    They won't even let you sing to Odin under the bridge or whatever you do when you are all oiled up.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You're the one crying that the GOP couldn't win lol? You seem to be confused little guy

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    XD

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Good luck in the gulag, bro.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Good luck in the psychiatric ward

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    and is refusing to concede with half the populace enthusiastically supporting him.

    Half the population didn't even vote for Trump. Even much less of the population that did vote for Trump is now going to rebel against the union for him. He lost, it is highly unlikely the Supreme Court is going to change that.

    [–]Minedwe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Because threatening our own movement even more over MAGApedes seething is retarded. We have proof that liberalism and democracy don't work. We will have proof that both Democrats and Republicans are Jewish grifters who hate us and want us dead. Why pass up the opportunity to let the establishment trip over its own feet and wake up tons of Whites?

    [–][deleted]  (27 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      A true dissident does not support the Trump cult, you can vote for him but not be a part of the MAGA cult. You are brainwashed by the system if you think he is a radical against globalism and leftism when it is all an illusion. Neither the leftist hysteria nor the worship from the right has any basis in reality when it comes to Trump. Please don't speak about "real politics" if you can't see through this.

      Did you know his chief of staff said they want even more immigrants and insiders have said they planned to expand legal immigration his 2nd term? They can do that because the issue is only "illegal immigration" so they can convince you that legal immigration is good and conservatives buy into it. America is more pro immigration than ever now and the topic didn't even come up this election. No one even cares anymore. Obama's administration deported more illegals and the only change in legal immigration Trump made prior to Covid-19 was to expand h1b visas and defend that attack on American tech workers by giving corporate America's talking points about how we don't have enough skilled labour. Bannon at least seemed to have some unique ideas but he was purged.

      If Trump was a nationalist, even a civic nationalist, I would support and defend him but he is not so all you are defending is someone who triggers the libs.

      [–]president_camacho 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Whatever the alt right ever was, it's revealed itself to be a bunch of disconnected armchair radicals who'll listen to 5 hour evola podcats but don't know the first thing about real politics

      Well that's the thing innit. They arent radicals. There's nothing they believe in that is particularly radical or extreme. They are simply intellectually honest ordinary folks who go against the radical white hating Jewish establishment and therefore get labeled radical by said establishment and their useful idiots.

      [–]Minedwe 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

      You're a fucking idiot if you think that fascists and NatSocs or anyone else here for that matter are going to take to the streets in earnest because a Jew-simping, barely-better-than-the-opposition accelerationist candidate lost to an even better accelerationist candidate. Fuck off with your soy-filled NeoCon logic.

      I hate to go around calling people Feds but you are literally poking us with a stick saying "C'mon, just do a terrorism already". You glow brighter than the sun.

      [–][deleted]  (15 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Albatros 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

        Trump is the accelerationist choice

        No he isn't, this is what you say to yourself to feel better. You don't understand what accelerationism means.

        For example, if you have two options, A and B, and B is the worst option and A slightly better than B but the social currents point to/move towards B, accelerationism simply means to disregard/reject the idea of defending A just to stop B. Instead you should try to combat B from your values (call that C), and if that isn't possible (since the social currents are too strong) you have two options: (i) retreating to a more esoteric position or (ii) wait until it's too much of a chaos for B (or any social order) to impose itself and then try to impose C.

        Replace A: (neo)conservatism/Trumpism, B:Democrat-style neoliberalism, C:Ethnonationalism/Traditionalism

        Obviously this is too much for a person entrenched in A, who was never a real nationalist, and this is where our paths diverge.

        u/Markimus maybe we need a post explaining accelerationism

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

        u/Markimus maybe we need a post explaining accelerationism

        Why me? Do you think I'm an accelerationist or something? I don't really know anything about that stuff except everyone's definition of it seems to contradict everyone else's and they all seem to just be doing some weird copes.

        [–]NeoRail 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        The issue with accelerationism is that it makes zero sense unless it is paired with an intelligent overarching strategy which simply does not exist. That's why a lot of guys interpret it in a Justin Trudeau-like "when you lose, you win" fashion. As it stands right now, most accelerationists seem to think that accelerating towards increasingly farcical forms of liberalism is the same as accelerating towards productive political change.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Yeah I find people who invoke the term usually just apply it to whatever they want to happen, it's a meaningless cope. The system's going to do what it's going to do and our work must be done regardless of how fast the system is moving towards its goals.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        Have you read Men Among the Ruins? Interested in your thoughts on chapters 14 & 16 (especially 16) of it since you disagreed with me about United Europe in the past and Evola seems to be someone who influences a lot of your views.

        [–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        I have not read the whole book, but I have read some chapters before (including sixteen) and glanced through some of the others. I reread both chapters to refresh my memory. I can't recall what we have disagreed on before, but personally I have been growing increasingly convinced in the necessity of Pan-Europeanism lately, despite its apparent impossibility and comparative unpopularity when compared to a more old school sovereignty-oriented nationalism. Unapologetic Pan-Europeanism may be seemingly impractical, but if approached considerately it probably provides the most substantial basis for change.

        As to the contents of the chapters themselves, it seems to me that Evola has analysed the situation well. As it stands right now, there is little justification for a united Europe outside of a defiant, collective chauvinism derived "out of necessity". Pan-European sympathies seem most in fashion with groups the primary concern of which is the physical preservation of whatever is still left of Europe, rather than constructive unity based on a substantial sense of identity or durable principles. Broadly speaking, there is no will for a united Europe that falls outside the opposition to the current liberal status quo. All the major forces that could have been the source and center of that will are also spiritually and politically bankrupt or nonexistent today - I think the Catholic Church was a great example, though ironically it was far more credible in Evola's time than it is today.

        The most important part of chapter sixteen is probably the one dedicated to the practical side of things. I have no expectations from aristocratic circles, which today seem to be very strongly associated with liberalism, but a European order united in its own identity, values, culture and traditions seems like the most suitable approach to Pan-Europeanism. A free, voluntary, international organisation defined by its mission would be capable of retaining its essential strategic direction all the while preserving its independence from and freedom of action in regards to the local political circumstances. In the event of success, such an order could also provide the future character of a potential Pan-European superstate. None of this is very probable, but given the situation I think it's a very good model.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        The original disagreement was something along the line of you thinking united Europe would entail the destruction of local culture and identity because of mixing, the state potentially pushing a standardisation of a single language etc.

        but a European order united in its own identity, values, culture and traditions seems like the most suitable approach to Pan-Europeanism. A free, voluntary, international organisation defined by its mission would be capable of retaining its essential strategic direction all the while preserving its independence from and freedom of action in regards to the local political circumstances. In the event of success, such an order could also provide the future character of a potential Pan-European superstate. None of this is very probable, but given the situation I think it's a very good model.

        Agreed. He mentioned the SS in the chapter which is a group that I think was on the road to achieving almost exactly what he's looking for. The Legionaries also had a great model we should study and try to emulate. There's a lot to be learned from the past too, Sparta and medieval military orders for example have a lot of things we can learn from in terms of building a suitable model. I don't think larping is the answer though, we must be men of our times and thus we need an aesthetic that is kind of archeofuturistic. I particularly like the Rise Above Movement for this on the aesthetic level. I think we should emulate this kind of formula for the outward appearance and then internally we need to be living according to principles, have initiation rites, some sort of asceticism, as well as doing community work and trying to build a mass movement. Evola is much too harsh and rigid on mass participation/democracy/populism, he seems to think you can just build a group of elites and start an already-perfected state out of thin air by appealing to already existing elites or something whereas I agree with you that they're all just agents of libtardism and finance, I think our only path to power has been shown by the PNF and NSDAP. We need to take power through populist means (the largest obstacle already) then begin the transition to a true state whilst somehow not being destroyed by international finance in another insane war.

        [–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        The original disagreement was something along the line of you thinking united Europe would entail the destruction of local culture and identity because of mixing, the state potentially pushing a standardisation of a single language etc.

        Overemphasis on centralisation and a lack of autonomy is certainly one possible option. Another possible problem is that without a geopolitical center, there's the risk of infighting. To give an example of a state that Evola viewed highly, in the Holy Roman Empire the Germans played a central role even though the state itself wasn't explicitly German. In the current context it is far more difficult to determine if any country could fill that role, if the role is still necessary and how the problem should be tackled if it does prove to be necessary.

        He mentioned the SS in the chapter which is a group that I think was on the road to achieving almost exactly what he's looking for.

        I have been noticing an uptick of interest in the concept of the Ordenstaat recently, which I think is curious. Apart from their mysticism, Evola was also favourable towards the SS before and during the war, though they weren't as favourable towards him.

        There's a lot to be learned from the past too, Sparta and medieval military orders for example have a lot of things we can learn from in terms of building a suitable model.

        This was a popular idea during the 20th century. Evola spent a good amount of time writing about the ideal of chivalry, knightly orders and the crusades, since he considered those to be great points of reference. The French also experimented with those themes - Maurras and Action Française put some emphasis on knighthood. I believe there was also a Vichy government-associated paramilitary unit during the Second World War that specifically designed its image around the concept of the knightly order. You could probably even find some knight themed recruitment posters in French, if you look for them.

        Evola is much too harsh and rigid on mass participation/democracy/populism, he seems to think you can just build a group of elites and start an already-perfected state out of thin air by appealing to already existing elites or something whereas I agree with you that they're all just agents of libtardism and finance,

        This only occurred to me just now, but maybe in the immediate postwar era appealing to the elites and to the masses may have seemed equally hopeless, in which case appealing to the elite would be the preferable option. Politically effective mass discontent is a very recent phenomenon, after all. With that said, Evola did acknowledge the absolute necessity to vigorously engage with the masses, once suitable conditions are in place. I feel that the main reason he emphasises elitism so much is for the purpose of building organisations and informal networks that prioritise quality over quantity. That's how I interpreted it, at least.

        I think our only path to power has been shown by the PNF and NSDAP.

        PNF was one of the French parties, right?

        We need to take power through populist means (the largest obstacle already) then begin the transition to a true state whilst somehow not being destroyed by international finance in another insane war.

        The challenge with populism consists in being populist enough to take power but not so populist as to dilute your principles beyond the point of no return. For example, Trump is a right wing populist, but his populism is an end rather than a means. Every right winger feels less distant to Trump than to the average liberal career politician, but Trump still can't offer anything other than what a career politician can offer.

        [–]Albatros 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        You don't have to be an accelerationist to understand it. I thought you'd know about it since you seem to be in these circles for years. I'll try to make a post about it, the way i see it.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        i regret to inform u i avoid everyone who uses the term accelerationism because i lack the patience to tolerate copeposting and fedposting

        [–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        The problem is there is no such thing a "peaceful protest" in the eyes of the media and the faithful goyim when it's being done by mainstream "right-wingers" like MAGA ZOGbots, much less when it is people like us.

        Biden and his ilk will redpill plenty of people when he doesn't do what he promised, when he and his VP go after Whites, crack down on free speech, etc.

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        I'm very serious about these protests having to be peaceful

        Even if patriots are extremely lawful and respectful in their protests they will be attacked by atifa/blm and the media will gaslight the public that the 'terrorist right wing radicals' started it all. That doesn't mean we shouldn't get out there but we need to understand that they've been building up antifa and blm for just this purpose.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        If you're a "dissident" and aren't even prepared to go out and defend a sitting president

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        [–]NeoRail 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        That was certainly a stunning take, almost makes you wonder what five hour podcast he got that one from.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Revolutionary activity is when you defend the people in power, the more power they have the more of a revolutionary you are.

        This guy is like the GOP equivalent of antifa delusion lmao

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Have we spoken before? Anyway, you should consider that "wignats" are not a unified bloc. Some may be simping for Biden, but most just don't care. Supporting Biden is definitely a mistake, but I fail to see how supporting Trump is helpful, either. It's unlikely that even conservatives will do that at this point. Even if they did, Trump would just sell them out. What is there to gain from defending Trump? What could be achieved? What long term benefit would there be from it and how is it worth the potential cost? Frankly, "five hour Evola podcasts" would probably be a better use of time, since at least you are running into something new and interesting.

          [–]Albatros 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          You have to be trolling now... If someone doesn't support a zionist puppet or doesn't care about electoral processes at all is a larper but people who will defend Trump, even after what happened in the Unite the Right march, are the true dissidents?

          Just admit you were never a nationalist in the true sense of the word but rather a civic nationalist with some edgy views about race/IQ who found his Messiah in the face of Trump.

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Its mostly a movement of armchair podcast enthusiasts because it stopped any serious campaigning post-Charlotsville and put all its support into the "sitting president with favorable views", who doesn't really have as many favourable views as people really think.

          [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          If there is fraud going on then I hope Trump exposes it and takes all possible legal action and may it succeed.

          However that's largely a distraction in my mind. The real thing to focus on -- fraud or no -- is why his second campaign was just a terrible strategy and why his first worked so well. I wish the people who are screaming about fraud would spend an equal time scratching their head and wondering why immigration, non-interventionist foreign policy and protectionist trade were not front and center in his second campaign and why homosexual outreach, Israel and letting Blacks out of prison and giving them half a trillion dollars was.

          That's the real question they should be asking but they never will. They'll sit around like the Democrats did and bellyache for four years about a stolen election rather than ask the serious questions about what they want from their politicians and what their actual interests are. This is the new most potent form of Finkelthink on display. Instead of getting serious we spend our time moaning about how the other side cheated.

          [–]Bagarmoossen 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Trump was convinced by Jared Kushner and others to tone down pro-white rhetoric in favour of minority outreach. Also, the pandemic hoax was specifically designed to crush people's morale and break their spirits, and it SUCCEEDED TREMENDOUSLY.

          [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          These are just pathetic excuses in my mind and just beg other questions. WHY was Trump convinced by Kushner to do that?

          It's not good enough to just say 'Well he only failed because he made bad decisions.' That's a circular argument.

          I'm not into pathetic excuses and conspiracy copes. They're for Boomers.

          [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          People blaming Kushner and shit are dumb. Trump has been running gayops for 20 years. He tried to infiltrate and destroy the Reform Party years ago because the GOP was scared that Buchanan would threaten them. He helped Bush get elected etc.

          Of course in 2015/16 I was fooled too because I didn't look into his history but just look at him. Most of his family are literally jews and he's been running gayops for years. He's a JEW YORK billionaire for fuck's sake. As soon as he started doing anti-white neocon shit in early 2017 I realised we got duped, I got over the feeling that I was a retard for trusting him and stopped coping. I became anti-Trump. I guess these kids' pride is too large, they don't want to admit to themselves they were tricked and feel stupid for it, but they're just digging themselves further and further with these unbelievably delusional cope. It's so embarrassing to see.

          [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I'll add another point: The best teams in the world if they lose a game do not sit around the next week moaning about the weather, bad refereeing decisions or the quality of the pitch or any other crap that's out of their control. Do you know what they do? They spend the rest of the week focusing on their own performance and what they could have done better and what errors they made. That's what serious people do and that's what winners do.

          If Conservatives want to be Beautiful Losers™ then so be it. They always do and they seemingly always will. But like I said I think serious people should be, especially when it's all settled either way, focusing on the mistakes Trump made and not the weather on election day.

          We'll wait and see.

          [–]The_Frag_Man 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I wish the people who are screaming about fraud would spend an equal time scratching their head and wondering why immigration, non-interventionist foreign policy and protectionist trade were not front and center in his second campaign and why homosexual outreach, Israel and letting Blacks out of prison and giving them half a trillion dollars was.

          Right

          [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          There is no fighting globalism without fighting global capital and its rule over nations. There is no ideological war between regular Republican policies and Trumpism. The only difference is that many Republicans don't want to represented by such an obnoxious persona and his cult. Nothing has blackpilled me more than by how many of the supposedly dissented right have fallen for the belief that Trump is a radical figure because of how much he is hated by Leftists and the elite. I would support a civic nationalist Trump but even that we did not get. If there are future Republicans like Hawley or Tucker who will run with a civic nationalist platform that will fight against mass immigration, woke leftism, and for American worker rights then I will be a supporter. Trump just gives us corporate Republican policies with hysterical leftist reaction to him that convinces right wing people Trump is doing radical things.

          The only thing we most hope for is Trump and his cult to go away and stop sucking the energy out of potietnally true anti globalist nationalist movements.

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]Albatros 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            No, you have to shill for Trump and the GOP 24/7 otherwise you're not a true dissident fighting the system.

            [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            Accept defeat

            no.

            [–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            It's too early to say if Trump will win or lose. If the fraud is as extensive as it appears to be, it will be very easy to flip all of these close states in a recount.

            [–]wormbloat 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Your post is extremely stupid. fuck off

            [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            maybe the dissident right should be more careful who they support in elections and referendums in future

            Like there was any other choice in 2016. I don't regret voting for Trump one bit, it DID push the overton window and allow time to wake up a shit ton of normies.

            [–]Bagarmoossen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            Ballot fraud or not, Biden's election is the result of a globalist coup against the West, and the main pillar of that coup was the Coronavirus hoax. This is an illegitimate presidency, and this is the narrative that we should push.

            It has become clear that globalists intend to enslave us completely. There can be no solution inside this system. Radicalizing the masses in the only way forward.

            [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            No it's not. The globalists already own the west and have done since they defeated the only force that ever fought them at WW2. All that's going to happen is jew orgs will continue whatever they were going to do regardless of who is president because no one who is part of the system is ever going to stop them.

            It has become clear that globalists intend to enslave us completely. There can be no solution inside this system. Radicalizing the masses in the only way forward.

            This is right though. The only solution is a mass movement. Everyone needs to study the NSDAP and PNF and work on replicating as much as possible.

            [–]Leo_Littlebook 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            No. Blocked.

            [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            There will be a civil war in the GOP between Trumpism and Romney/McCain conservatism and Trumpism will probably be in the losing end.

            I highly doubt that. Trump got more votes than any Republican ever.

            [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Did Biden? I think the high turnout is just because covid meant people had nothing to do moreso than this election actually being important to people. You could honestly barely even tell it was election time the past couple months, it only feels like the hysterial election mania post-election because all the GOP votebrains are having mental breakdowns.

            [–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            America will soon resemble China. Dissidents will be ruthlessly eliminated. Anyone with half a brain should be planning to leave America.