you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wouldn't they go to a single candidate in an update we see if they were simply put in the system all at once, each one of the candidates at a time? Rather than discarding republican votes or something they were just counted and put in separately at a time as they have both increased now.

[–]WatchOutThere[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Could you rephrase your comment? I am having some difficulty correctly interpreting it.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

On the graph it shows a sudden spike where the entirety of votes went to Biden. I'm saying it could be that the Biden votes were counted and put in all at once separately from Trumps. Which explains the suspicious spike for Biden in the update.

[–]WatchOutThere[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Plausible, but that completely goes against any norms when it comes to counting ballots. This only happened in Michigan and Wisconsin, which are both key states and ones Trump won quite easily in 2016. These two states can literally determine who becomes President. Also, why didn't this happen anywhere else in the country and if this is how they went about counting the ballots, why was there not a similar spike for Trump?

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

why was there not a similar spike for Trump?

His votes did come in, Biden had only a 0.5% edge on Trump for a while after Biden's spike. It may be fraud, but I'm only saying this spike isn't quite evidence.