all 9 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, our people need to realise they are morally right and build the moral courage to stand up against injustice. Instead we have people rationalising their weakness as intelligence and virtue, it's sad. Our race will be genocided with no resistance whilst all the people aware of it just stroke their ego about how they're too intelligent and morally pure to ever defend themselves.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

'Groups don't think'.

I love basic bitch autism libertarian answers to problems in this world. They're the best.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is where we differ my good friend, I feel nothing but a burning hatred when I see these idiots.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just went back and it's so funny. Liberalists/Libertarians always virtually say the same thing which amounts to your way of thinking is a violation of the rules for what is allowed forms of thought I've made up and believe should be followed. In other words their entire disagreement with say the way people like us think amounts to it not being liberal enough. Well no shit, dude. I'm not a liberal in any sense.

I remember asking the same question on the Liberalist reddit sub a while ago that went something along the lines of 'What argument against White Racialism do you have other than it violates your principles?' and never getting a serious answer because there isn't any. I'm not a liberalist/libertarian so why would the made up little rules you have in your head matter to me?

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Browns will justify petty acts of extreme violence on innocent individuals because they were collectively defeated in the game of life.

    Alt right when deconstructionists attack christianity, white people, masculinity etc: STOP GENOCIDING ME WAH WAH WAH

    Alt right when these same people attack muslims and get owned: OY VEY THEY WERE INNOCENT

    Do you hate psychopathic liberals that want to destroy your culture, history, traditions and physical existence or not? Why is it when they do the same things they're doing to us to others you feel the need to defend them?

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      You have it all backwards. The muslims aren't the ones with power, the capitalists are. Killing the general is more important than chasing a unit he has that is rebelling against him, thus actually doing him a favour.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Just because some raghead hates Jews, doesn't mean he cares about the rape of our wives, our daughters, our sisters, and our mothers.

        I agree with this. However, /u/markimus point still stands. If White nationalists publicly act out against blacks or muslims it's used as a weapon against us in the culture war and over the long term our own brainwashed people destroy us. We need to put all our focus on the people and hijacked institutions of propaganda that enslaves the minds of our own people. Even if we only save a small percentage from liberal hedonism that's millions of new dissidents that can help us either build a new ethnostate or to collectivize with when the time comes to push back. The name of the game is waking as many minds up because there will be a time that the normie mind is totally closed to us all together.

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          Also, I really don't think someone should have their head chopped off just for disagreeing with me. I mean, there does come a point that the death penalty is acceptable but I think it's reasonable to say that someone was innocent when all they did is draw a picture or make a joke.

          To start, enjoy a quote from Himmler:

          “One sins against loyalty and honor, not only when one offends one’s own honor or that of another SS man, but also and especially when one does not respect the honor of others, when one mocks things that are sacred to others or when one does not intervene manfully on behalf of those who are absent, on behalf of the weak and the defenseless.“

          I find this 'we just disagree' akin to 'we just support different sportsball teams' perspective comes from people internalising liberalism and the cynicism and irony of the postmodern world. It absolutely should not be acceptable to attack things that are sacred to people; their family, their religion, their fatherland, their race. These things are sacred and that's important, the only reason we don't see a problem with this as white people is because we've been so thoroughly demoralised and ironypoisoned to not value anything. How many western white people would punch a stranger for calling their mom a whore today? (I wouldn't, I've grown up in a culture of utter disrespect to mothers where I told and heard hundreds of mom jokes daily, I wonder who might have popularised this practice?) How do you think that number compares to Eastern Europeans and non-whites? We have had honour and the sacred stolen from us and we should absolutely take a stand against this.

          Recently a movie studio in I think Brazil was firebombed after they released some degenerate shit, now imagine if this happened to the newspapers, music studios, movie studios etc that were working to deconstruct our people all last century. Do you think Cuties would exist if people burned every book, the homes and places of work of the paedophiles, including some of the most prominent intellectuals ever, who signed the 1977 French petition to remove the age of consent? Of course not, this 'oh it's just a critique/disagreement/a joke/free expression in art' etc mindset is exactly what got us in the mess we're in, generations before us just sat back and watched as everything they held dear was set ablaze and now we're so poisoned by living in the burned rubble that we can't even recognise what was once before us and its value. We mistakenly believe that those that still know their metaphorical home and fight back against the arsonists are savages then we work with the arsonists to turn their homes into the burned rubble we have to endure.

          It does become a problem when people try to say that secularism, liberalism, and tolerance are what need to be used to defeat Islam

          Exactly, and that's all this stuff ever amounts to. "We need to culturally genocide the foreigners so they're deracinated untermensch with no soul just like us", I don't see how this is beneficial to us at all. All it would do is bolster liberalism and capitalism accelerating our own decline. The 'reactionary' tendencies of muslims is the only thing even coming close to decelerating degeneracy, they're the only cunts that ever protest schools teaching 5 year olds about transgender man-boy-love anal orgies. Taking the side of liberalism against the muslims in these kinds of cases can never be useful. That doesn't mean you're pro-islam/foreigner/anything else, it just means you're consistently against your oppressors rather than randomly helping them because of your petty racial or religious antagonisms.

          When it comes to this specifically, I only mind attacks on Christianity when it's being done in an anti-white, anti-traditional way. Unless Christianity becomes a vehicle for nationalism again, I don't mind its decline. Right now, it's used to justify Zionism, dysgenics, and so-called anti-racism.

          Well yes, I would include the Christian churches themselves as being part of this trend to genocide our people as they have become vehicles for liberalism, the churches themselves are the main poisoners and destroyers of Christianity but Christianity isn't even the point anyway. They're just one part of these attacks that are attacks on our people and everything we've ever held sacred. They're psychological warfare, they're destruction of history and culture and eventually they're going to be the literal destruction of our race. We should have no tolerance whatsoever for the bourgeois and their liberalism that has turned the world upside down.

          My apologies for the wall of text.

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Isn't it funny how everyone has to add a disclaimer about not being a racist when they bring up Wagner or Heidegger but nobody says anything about not being a pedophile when they bring up Sartre or Foucault?

            It begins to happen more and more as well with more artists being discovered to have held and related in their art ideas suspect to the modern mind. I hate that so much. I love Shakespeare and will go to a production every once and a while and not only is there ridiculous amounts of 'diversity' in the casts they literally just edit out the inconvenient parts now. It's not a secret either they go on radio and brag about it. There's some extremely essentialist discussions in A Midsummer Night's Dream regarding gender and they just edit them out now.