Why do members of the far right seem to like President John Kennedy?

submitted by ayotollahsinIran from self.debatealtright

I've seen this idea around alot of alt right forums that JFK was based because he apparently 'praised' Hitler in his diary(stuff of legends quote) and apparently the Jews assassinated him for some reason. Even if this was true he was the architect of the civil rights act, pursued integration and shaped the modern social values of the Democratic party. Why the praise for him?

all 21 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

and apparently the Jews assassinated him for some reason

Was in the process of forcing the fed to create a silver backed dollar, gave a speech naming secret societies, and opposed to Israel getting uranium to build nuclear weapons. He also opposed organized crime and was a catholic (before the catholic church was totally pozzed).

Even if this was true he was the architect of the civil rights act

passed after his assassination.

pursued integration

Lots of people did.

and shaped the modern social values of the Democratic party.

That's a pretty broad statement. I doubt Kennedy could possibly imagine how marxist, degenerate and compromised the modern DNC would become.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I doubt Kennedy could possibly imagine how marxist, degenerate and compromised the modern DNC would become.

Bullshit. He would simp for it just like his POS brother Ted.

Agreed with OP, the Kennedy worship by the alt-right is ridiculous. He had zero integrity and went with the zeitgeist. It just so happened that the USA was more anti-Israel/organized crime/secret society in the 50s and 60s.

[–]ayotollahsinIran[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't the alt right for segregation though?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Segregation, deportation or right of association (legal right to self segregate).

My point is that Kennedy wasn't the only one leading the desegregation charge. It was common. The alt right doesn't worship Kennedy either. That's a strawman argument. Kennedy is a mixed bag. As a dissident you have to take what you can get with presidents. Kennedy is more liked by the trad catholic/groyper side of the alt right. I think a lot of dissidents that are former liberals (like myself) like him as well because he was clearly attempting to keep the Jews out of cultural influence positions and keep the catholic church relevant as a cultural force. The Jews gained a lot more power over the national zeitgeist when traditional Catholicism was effectively marginalized in the 60's by the jew wasp alliance. The people in the alt right that dislike Kennedy are probably protestants that haven't opened a dialogue with trad cats or even worse larpy pagans.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

(before the catholic church was totally pozzed).

Maurice Pinay... Church has been hijacked by Talmudics.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maurice Pinay

Not a real person though. It's a pseudonym for a group of anon catholic clergymen.

Hutton Gibson (aka Mel Gibson's father) is an author worth reading on this subject. As is Bella Dodd and of course EMJ.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course, yes I know that, but his blog is quite good at exposing the current Catholic cchufch and how it is opposed to traditional catholicism.

EMJ was pictures with Dugin, though I ha e one of his books and it is quite refreshing. Dodd's, I also have. Noahide Talmudics have taken over the Catholics Church.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Why do members of the far right seem to like President John Kennedy?

Because he stood up to globalists/Jews/"intelligence" agencies, and he got assassinated for that (among other things). Not a perfect guy but good by most post-WWII standards

[–]ayotollahsinIran[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What about his general stance on Social issues?He was basically a modern Liberal and if he wasn't killed the US would be in the same spot.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Again, "not a perfect guy." I think the reverence you perceive is highly inflated. Ted Kennedy was a POS, obviously, Kennedy might have been no different had he lived long enough to see it.

You come to appreciate a different perspective on global geopolitics once you understand the international influence of Jews, Banks, and democratically unaccountable intelligence agencies. Kennedy was one of the few who actually tried to fight this system in its relative infancy. It could've been a very different world if he had succeeded in that.

You also express no interest in the Kennedy assassination or the motives behind it. On it's face, this should have been the more interesting/controversial part of my comment, if you knew nothing about the subject

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tried to make AIPAC a foreign agent. At least RFK did and was killed for it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Watch out, that website tries to confirm the offical RFK killing.

JFK was killed by many groups.

Michelle Metta makes this clear: The Likudniks, Chabadniks, CIA, Mossad, Israel and its prime minister, oil oligarchs and the MIC, noahide US masonic corporations of the southern and northern lodges who signed an anti-JFK pact with the Italian P2 grand Orient lodge.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

He tried to but the dollar back on silver. That alone makes me love the man; no president since had the balls to try and restrain the fed

[–]ayotollahsinIran[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

What does that mean though?Why would that make your life any better?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Attaching real scarcity to currency would change everything.

At the moment, money is completely made up and is subject to the whims of the federal reserve since every currency is linked to the USD in 2020 (except for Iran and other countries with self contained banking). It's not conspiratorial to say the fed controls the world economy- it's openly its function.

[–]ayotollahsinIran[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How would that make your life any better?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

...if money was real? Do I really need to answer that?

Economic feedback loops would be enforced and that which should fail, would actually fail. Failing countries wouldn't be subsidized and failed ideas wouldn't be propped. In short, everything would change.

[–]ayotollahsinIran[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't get it at all to be honest.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In 2008 when the economy was poised to fail from corrupt practices and ass-backwards policy (loan assessments, poor management, etc), the federal reserve stepped in and poured billions into companies like Fannie Mae and BoA that deserved to die and be buried for letting ideology cloud basic judgement- bear in mind that these companies were handing out mortgages like candy to low income black families and surprisingly never got loan repayments and witnessed most of their clients default.

The same Bank of America gave ONE BILLION USD to BLM just a couple months ago and clearly has learned nothing from its ideology-over-business practices. The Federal Reserve should have never conducted quantitative easing and should had NEVER bailed out a company as fucked as BoA. This has real world implications for everyday Americans.

Make sense?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plus, permanent public debt based on interest bearing loans; banks don't even need to exist, just have holding houses.

[–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There was a recent article at Counter Currents, which argues the U.S. (and by extension the world) would be a better place if Nixon had won in 1960.

Counter-Currents:

Despite the similarities in the campaign, Nixon was a superior president when he came into office eight years later. If he had won earlier, he may have saved this country from a lot of grief. Nixon, knowing the plans for the Bay of Pigs as Vice President, would have likely committed more American military resources towards it and made it a successful operation against the Castro regime. No Castro, no Cuban missile crisis.

Kennedy felt a stronger need to prove he was tough on foreign policy and got us more enmeshed into Vietnam as a result. His advisers, famously dubbed the “best and the brightest” by David Halberstam, persuaded Kennedy’s successor to get us into a full-blown war in Southeast Asia. Nixon already had impeccable anti-communist bonafides and would have been more inclined to a realist approach to Vietnam. Imagine American history with only a limited engagement in Nam.

Domestically, Nixon would’ve probably followed Eisenhower’s reluctance to fully champion civil rights and would’ve steered clear of the comprehensive legislation backed by JFK and LBJ. Nixon also didn’t write a book called A Nation of Immigrants and wouldn’t have revolutionized American immigration policy. LBJ, in an attempt to honor Kennedy’s legacy, did so through the Immigration Act of 1965.

Under Nixon, we may have not seen the civil rights revolution enshrined by the federal government, our nation swamped by mass immigration, and we would have likely not wasted blood and treasure in Vietnam. In all likelihood, America would be a better country today if Nixon had won. [Cont...]