all 18 comments

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Do you guys think she even seems odd? Watch other interviews of these and compared their mannerisms to hers, to me she seems completely normal she just talks about stuff most normies don't think about. Kind of crazy you can be institutionalised for this, it's pretty clear she just got into reading Traditionalists and people like Serrano and Devi.

In the post war period people still loyal to National Socialism were being put in prison or institutionalised a lot, Ezra Pound is probably the most famous example. Yockey knew they were coming to do this to him too (he wrote about these things) so he killed himself.

[–]Minedwe 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

They just got done attempting to destroy Fascism and National Socialism, and a few people (like Patton, GLR, etc.) were noticing things, so they tried to suppress that. People like Patton were killed and others like Pound were imprisoned, discouraging others from speaking out about the successes of National Socialism and Fascism.

[–]AshenFarms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

'Successes'

[–]Minedwe 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

How can you not consider the 3rd Reich successful? They achieved a far higher standard of living and achieved extreme technological advancements in 12 years of existence.

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–]EuropeanAwakening 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You can't put that all on Germany, not even most, when the British and French wanted the war in the first place and turned down every peace offer. They also had a much larger re-armament before the war started, while Germany was choosing to build cruise ships for the German Labor Front recreation program over battleships, which shows the imperial powers were preparing for a war. They wanted it.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That was a result of war. The direction the Anglo-Jewish created Wiemar Germany was heading was far worse than the fallout of any military conflict.

    [–]Minedwe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    The only millions of deaths were Germans slaughtered in scores by Soviet animals and the only destroyed landscapes were German landscapes destroyed by Jew-controlled Brits, Soviets and Americans, justified with a fictional "genocide" (271,301 Jews dying of disease is hardly a genocide) and a light bombing campaign that killed far fewer in London.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      By that logic, Democracy and Globalism are failures because the US couldn't/didn't stop 9/11, and Britain is a failure because it failed to prevent the Blitz.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Minedwe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Winning a war at insanely steep odds against most of the world is not a requirement for success.

        I'm talking about meaningful success, as in creating a greater life for their citizens and achieving feats of technology, science, etc.

        [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Because the world wanted to destroy them.

        [–]AshenFarms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

        Where is it now then?

        [–]EuropeanAwakening 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        This is logically fallacious questioning. NS Germany being successful doesn't mean external factors couldn't have destroyed it. Not mutually exclusive.

        The largest empires on the planet, British, French, Soviet, American, fought to destroy it at the behest of Jews and global capital all while proclaiming Germans wanted to tale over the world.

        [–]AshenFarms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        If the allies wanted to destroy Germany they would have done it in 1936 or 1938. Nazi germany was built on one big Ponzi scheme,hitler knew the only way he could pay for rearmament and his economic policy was to invade other nations and to steal their resources. If he didn't the economy would have collapsed,any historian can tell you that.there hasn't been a single successful fascist nation in history.for your second piece name me one Jew in Fdrs cabinet,name me one Jew in chamberlains cabinet. Why did Stalin plan mass deportation of Jews and purged the Jewish bolsheviks in the show trials if he was a Jewish puppet?show me Jewish power in France.

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        If the allies wanted to destroy Germany they would have done it in 1936 or 1938.

        That doesn't make sense salos.

        Nazi germany was built on one big Ponzi scheme

        Putting people back to work and restarting your currency based on the labor of the populace is not a ponzi scheme. It's literally the opposite.

        hitler knew the only way he could pay for rearmament and his economic policy was to invade other nations and to steal their resources

        Yes this is the bogus narrative of the people that conquered Germany and this is the current specious argument of western academia controlled by Jews and their military and high finance allies held together through the illicit trade of children.

        If he didn't the economy would have collapsed,

        Economies don't normally collapse when they are building this. Isn't it interesting the modern academia all agrees that the great depression in the United States was ended when people went to work to build armaments for world war two but academics all universally disagree that the same military arming increase the German economy.

        any historian can tell you that.

        That's because if they hold any other position they lose their chair and get replace by a jew or a shabbos.

        there hasn't been a single successful fascist nation

        Except: Rome, Sparta, [insert 100 other historical examples]. Almost all successful nations share fascist ideologies including Israel and China in 2020.

        for your second piece name me one Jew in Fdrs cabinet,name me one Jew in chamberlains cabinet

        This is a lazy debate tactic. Stop making people you're debating dig up information that isn't really pertinent to the primary argument. You're using obvious Talmudic bad faith pilpul and that's against the rules here Salos. I've spoken with you on this over multiple occasions. Find another internet community to subvert everyone here already knows your tricks.

        Why did Stalin plan mass deportation of Jews and purged the Jewish bolsheviks in the show trials if he was a Jewish puppet?show me Jewish power in France.

        More examples of you forcing debate partners to over research and write full essays in order to respond to you. This is a classic forum shilling tactic. You can't even be bothered to punctuate your comments correctly and you want people to write essays for you? Why don't you fuck off?

        [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        one big Ponzi scheme

        The West's economy is one big Ponzi scheme.

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Wow bro the 4 world empires bombed the shit out of their country, what losers lol. Fucking retard

        [–]AshenFarms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        For no reason at all.

        [–]Minedwe 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        So your argument is that if something is destroyed it isn't a worthwhile ideology?