you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

cant wait for another 8 years of 'redpilled' people simping for based gop pro-white led by tucker

i find it all tiresome, he says some good shit on his show and he's open about his intentions; he recognises psycho jews being jews are pushing the people towards revolution and he'll be the reformist pressure release valve. how about we just have the revolution instead?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Read his book. Listen to some of his low key bantz on podcasts. Tucker is third position light. He literally called for aggressively banning of self driving trucks. Name me another republican that even approaches such an anti libertarian pro socialist position (and since most truck drivers are white it's a direct move to protect white wages). Tucker is obviously not a racialist but he is a nationalist (a real one) and I think he'd make more concrete pro US sovereignty moves than Trump. Trump talks but doesn't walk.

Tucker is anti military industrialism (just covered Trumps speech on this and was very positive). Tucker is also weary of Israel. He's not anti Israel but if you notice he only shows his support for Israel when he's using it as a talking point to bash liberals (Israel borders for example; Israel national cohesion for example). This is a direct page from the dissident right playbook and it's super obvious that Tucker follows dissident commentary. I'm almost 100% confident he listens to FTN and probably follows pol as many journalists do. Heck Tucker is even JQ light. Calling out Kushner's influence on Trump? Based. Calling out the Jew Paul Singer's wrecking of Sidney, Nebraska? Super Based. And most Importantly (the main reason we should throw our support behind hem) is Tucker is WAY more woke on internet censorship and the problem with silicon valley tech oligarchs than Trump is. Tucker is a lot younger and intimately understands how these companies are hoovering up data and using it to help their Marxist internationalist desires. I'd highly recommend Tucker's Free Speech Podcast interview with Gavin if you want to learn more about him.

Do we have a chance of getting another RINO? Sure. There's always that chance because republicans have been cucked controlled opposition for a long time. However, even though Tucker isn't an 'acceleration' candidate he's definitely a step in the right direction. Do you really want republicanism to swing back towards Ben Shapiro, Mitch McConnell, and endless wars for Israel? Tucker is an affirmation that republicanism is heading a different direction and that's a very good thing.

edit. I forgot he's also a fanatical natalist. He very pro family and constantly talks about having kids young. This is huge.

edit 2. Tucker is near perfect optics on how he talks about women as well. The biggest attack the left uses on the alt right is how we talk about women. Tucker is traditional about women but frames it wonderfully and makes traditional life appealing to women. (listen to the linked podcast from 10 min to 14 min mark and listen to how tactfully Tucker speaks about women. I think that's what the alt right needs; someone who gets our redpills but dresses them up for a mass audience).

[–]AshenFarms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I feel we need some kind of protection force for him, there is no way this guy isn't targeted every minute.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I feel we need some kind of protection force for him,

100% agree.

there is no way this guy isn't targeted every minute.

They have come at him. Accosted his daughter at a restaurant. Banged on and broke his front door when his wife was alone. I think it will only get worse as he flirts with public office.

[–]AshenFarms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Would it feasible to have some Republican war veterans guard him or is their some kind of law or paperwork preventing that?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He probably already has something like this. Any public movement to protect him he might dissuade because the optics don't look good. Although if the attacks get more and more serious you never know; he might reach out quietly. If he runs for office and secures the nomination he will get some initial form of protection as well.