you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AFutureConcern[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Devil's advocate counterpoint to the obvious reaction here:

Many people on the right claim that "whites are waking up" and that the left, in becoming overtly anti-white, will provoke a reaction such that "they have no idea what's coming". If that's right, are not the anti-whites in the government correct to label "white supremacy" as the greatest terror threat to their anti-white regime?

[–]EuropeanAwakening 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, because the entire concept of "white supremacy" is meant to frame any White advocacy in and of itself as terrorism.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. People need to understand coded language. Of course the only actual 'terrorism' IE violent attacks on the public are done by anti-whites or non-whites such as Antifa, BLM, Islamic groups etc but these pose no threat to the current world order and are supported, financed and organised by the people in power, just like they support actual white terrorists like (the very likely intelligence asset) Brenton Tarrant and such due to these giving the western totalitarian neoliberal empire legitimacy.

The point of this 'white supremacist terorrism' thing isn't because they genuinely think white people are going to kill members of the public in nonsensical violence, they would in fact love for that to happen and they want it to happen which is why they're constantly trying to entrap mentally ill teenagers into doing this shit; just yesterday there was a case of some 'boogaloo bois' being gayopped by some fake Hamas shit in the US. They are framing it in the 'terrorism' language but what they really mean is the only threat to their power is white people organising against them. People have to understand that the only thing powerful people want is to a) increase their power and b) protect their power. They don't give a fuck if some random civilians are killed, what they really are talking about is their fear of organised white communities ousting them from power which they are referring to as 'terrorism' which is exactly what they say about the civilians that resist them in the Middle East, South America etc. Hezbollah, a political party and people's movement which has much more popular legitimacy than any western regime is a 'rogue terrorist group', what this word terrorist really means when they use it is any group that effectively resists them.

[–]Albatros 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From their point of view yes.