DHS to label white supremacists as the 'most persistent and lethal threat' to the US: report

submitted by AFutureConcern from thehill.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Mr9to5 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When it’s Antifa:

“Haha, yer stupid, there is no Antifa organization!”

When it’s the Right:

“They are a super dangerous collection of lone wolves and small cells. In fact, they’re more dangerous because they don’t join groups. Beware!!!”

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]AFutureConcern[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It was never about this:

    • Have consistent moral standards based on rules and definitions
    • Investigate reality to see how those standards apply to the world
    • Take the most likely action to see results according to those moral standards and the evidence

    It was always about this:

    • Believe firmly in egalitarianism and liberalism
    • Denounce those investigating or describing reality as racist because it contradicts your religious faith
    • Construct a narrative by any means necessary in order to prevent people reaching conclusions that contradict your faith

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    But when likidniks blow up the twin towers and kill 3,000 and another million brown people in the middle-east they get cushy jobs at Yale teaching ethics.

    [–]AFutureConcern[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Devil's advocate counterpoint to the obvious reaction here:

    Many people on the right claim that "whites are waking up" and that the left, in becoming overtly anti-white, will provoke a reaction such that "they have no idea what's coming". If that's right, are not the anti-whites in the government correct to label "white supremacy" as the greatest terror threat to their anti-white regime?

    [–]EuropeanAwakening 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No, because the entire concept of "white supremacy" is meant to frame any White advocacy in and of itself as terrorism.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes. People need to understand coded language. Of course the only actual 'terrorism' IE violent attacks on the public are done by anti-whites or non-whites such as Antifa, BLM, Islamic groups etc but these pose no threat to the current world order and are supported, financed and organised by the people in power, just like they support actual white terrorists like (the very likely intelligence asset) Brenton Tarrant and such due to these giving the western totalitarian neoliberal empire legitimacy.

    The point of this 'white supremacist terorrism' thing isn't because they genuinely think white people are going to kill members of the public in nonsensical violence, they would in fact love for that to happen and they want it to happen which is why they're constantly trying to entrap mentally ill teenagers into doing this shit; just yesterday there was a case of some 'boogaloo bois' being gayopped by some fake Hamas shit in the US. They are framing it in the 'terrorism' language but what they really mean is the only threat to their power is white people organising against them. People have to understand that the only thing powerful people want is to a) increase their power and b) protect their power. They don't give a fuck if some random civilians are killed, what they really are talking about is their fear of organised white communities ousting them from power which they are referring to as 'terrorism' which is exactly what they say about the civilians that resist them in the Middle East, South America etc. Hezbollah, a political party and people's movement which has much more popular legitimacy than any western regime is a 'rogue terrorist group', what this word terrorist really means when they use it is any group that effectively resists them.

    [–]Albatros 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    From their point of view yes.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Antifa and BLM literally burn down and destroy cities

    "It's the White Supremacists we have to worry about!"

    [–]antireddit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This is so stunningly out of touch with reality that it could actually serve to severely discredit DHS and/or red pill more whites about the concept of ZOG. The timing of this report will just make it look ridiculous. Normally the Jews that push for this shit dont care, since they can just use their media propaganda to push the narrative, but this is so egregious that it's bound to piss off a lot of normie conservatives and independents that are getting tired of seeing left wing violence night after night.

    I dont know what to think. Is this the Jews overplaying their hand once again? Is it an attempt to push some sort of overton window or get people used to the idea that "white supremacists" are the new Al Queda. Or is there no real strategy and it's just a bunch of Neurotic Jews and their shabbas goy Bureaucrat suck ups simply doing the only thing they know how to do regardless of current events or how their actions could be perceived.

    Not surprisingly the two stories linked are both written by members of the tribe, so there will no doubt be yet another coordinated media campaign to go along with the report, but media credibility has been so destroyed by the "mostly peaceful protestors" headlines that I'm not sure it will have any real effect beyond just making the media look stupid again and annoy people who arent already Rachel Maddow watching liberals or disingenuous Jews.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    TRUMP IS OUR SHABBOS GOY /s

    [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I have yet to hear anyone claim to be a "White Supremacist".

    They're merely paving the way for "laws" that put any White advocates on a list so they can surveil us and then swoop in when we walk our dogs off the leash or let our car registration lapse. Meanwhile "bricking" cops is excused as "protesting systemic racism".

    [–]AFutureConcern[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There are two things going on when someone is said to be a "white supremacist":

    1. The consensus among the general public is that a "white supremacist" is somebody who believes that white people are all inherently superior to non-whites because of their genetics and skin color.
    2. The academic definition whereby anyone with remotely conservative, capitalist or even liberal views who doesn't want to tear down society, is "complicit in white supremacy"; for example Donald Trump or any one of his tens of millions of supporters.

    The reality is that nobody fits the description of (1) which is really just a straw man against nationalist ideas. But academics and leftist media pundits apply the definition (2) to normie conservatives, causing them to disavow the "real white supremacists", which they'll do a quick Wikipedia search to confirm. That's us.

    I did come to a realization, though, regarding why leftists would associate even liberal meritocracy with "white supremacy". It's because they themselves believe that white people are superior (at least relative to the standard Western definition of achievement). While people on the right are very careful to say, "nobody is superior, we're just different," or "even if there are average differences, we should all judge people as individuals," or "every group should be proud of their own," I think some leftists are true believers in white superiority. They just think that the definition of "superior" ought to change, because they think that defining it in terms of how good one is at math, or English, or physics means white people will inevitably end up on top. Leftist Fredrik deBoer makes this point explicitly in his book The Cult of Smart, which Andrew Sullivan has termed "bell curve leftism".

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Well, they're not wrong.