I'm looking for resources on socialist economic theory from the perspective of the right

submitted by meatball4u from self.debatealtright

Surely there are some well thought out articles or books?

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]VarangianRasputin 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Germany Tomorrow by Otto Strasser is an Anti-Marxist, Anti-Hitler Socialist work, and a fairly good starting point.

Here is a collection of his translated articles. And here is a collection of his older brother Gregor's articles.

For some German self-titled National Bolsheviks from the same era, Karl Otto Paetal and Ernst Niekisch are your guys. Both links go to a collection of translated respective articles.

Stalin: The Enduring Legacy by Kerry Bolton is pretty good. Bolton looks at the pros of Stalin from a right-wing perspective, fighting degenerate art, Soviet Anti-Zionism, anti-globalism, etc.

[–]Jacinda 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've just finished the article linked below. It's an argument for 5 to 9 conservatism and for putting more emphasis on community and family life

American Affairs:

The idea that economics is the study of markets is one of the greatest mistakes of our time. Properly understood, economics is the study of the production of goods and the provision of services. The market is only one realm in which goods production and service provision are found. The others are the family, the state, and civil society (the nonprofit or charity realm). The family is the oldest economic institution, as the very term “economics”—from the Greek word for household management—suggests.

Each of the four interlocking economies that make up the econ­omy as a whole is based on a different set of principles. In the family economy, family relationships govern the pattern of both contributions and entitlements among family members. In the public econ­omy, the state takes in taxes and provides goods or services to citizens according to some conception of the public interest. In the market, goods are produced and services are provided by firms or individuals in return for profits or wages. In the nonprofit or charity economy, people donate gifts of money or labor to organizations which help needy individuals or supply social goods (like higher education or museums or hospitals or symphony orchestras). [Cont...]

Finding the correct balance between market, family, state, and civil society is something people will debate forever.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Have you watched cultured thugs video on natsoc economics?

[–]Jacinda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Found the following article. It describes how QE degrades a nation's character and, by extension, causes an economy to revolve around the the financial sector:

City Journal:

[A]sset inflation—ultimately, the debasement of the currency—as the principal source of wealth corrodes the character of people. It not only undermines the traditional bourgeois virtues but makes them ridiculous and even reverses them. Prudence becomes imprudence, thrift becomes improvidence, sobriety becomes mean-spiritedness, modesty becomes lack of ambition, self-control becomes betrayal of the inner self, patience becomes lack of foresight, steadiness becomes inflexibility: all that was wisdom becomes foolishness. And circumstances force almost everyone to join in the dance. [Cont...]

Here's another:

Spectator:

If money is free, it would make perfect sense to borrow as much as you need for the rest of your life, never pay it back, and then die. That may sound absurd, but that’s more or less what governments such as America’s are doing right now. In an earlier era, governments took out loans for big infrastructure investments that paid off in the long run; now governments borrow to pay the heating bill. They’re borrowing from a future that they no longer believe in. [Cont...]

We certainly live in interesting times.

[–]Mr9to5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you haven’t read it already the middle chapters of Men Among the Ruins by Evola, like the Work chapter, offer some great guidelines on what generally a better run economic system’s goals would be.

Povl Riis-Knudsen wrote some pamphlets floating around online that I recall sum up some good points - A Left Wing Movement and Biological Worldview. Google seems to have buried direct links but they are on various archive and National sites.

In a similar vein, the Cotswald Declaration itself is a great statement of Nationalism’s beauty, irrespective of what you think of NS.

Mosley always had some good points in his pamphlets along these lines. In general, I think the old Fascist 1.0 philosophers often explain it the best if you already assume social economics are part of the equation.