Part 5

Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy Continued...

The thing most damning about the Catastrophic Terrorism (CT) study was their joint speculation on what would have happened had the 1993 World Trade Center bombing brought down the twin towers...

"Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."

The proposal then suggests:

"More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks."

These members of the CT study also wrote:

"Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible."

"Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a before and after."

"Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities."

This isn't a proposal as much as it is a full out plan... neocon daydreaming on how to take down the United States.

Conclusion

When it comes to the numerous repeated references to "Pearl Harbor," it was all very deliberate. It was literally an elaborate mass conditioning scheme, to get people to once again accept the "great lie," as they did leading to WWII.

As coincidence would have it... conspicuously enough, the $450-million dollar movie blockbuster "Pearl Harbor" was also released early that year, in May of 2001, settling the horror of Dec 7, 1941 back into the public consciousness.

Add to that, this disturbing account. According to author Barbara Honegger, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had given out literally hundreds of copies of Pearl Harbor; Warning and Decision that year, written by Rand employee Roberta Wohlstetter. It was also reported to be required reading for Rumsfeld's personal aides.

With a multi-trillion dollar War on Terror looming on the horizon, this was not a coincidence.

The PNAC set the stage and then they played it for all its worth. This group was literally the poster-child for all things non-Constitutional mayhem post 9/11, most especially the run-up to the Iraq War.

Preceding the war, key PNAC members such as Paul Wolfowitz (later the head of the World Bank!!!) and Richard Perle beat the drum for war with Iraq as did Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel hard-line Likud party members. According the Vanderbilt Television Archives, Wolfowitz was on 180 times to sell the war while Perle was on 187.

They were programming the American public to not only accept their ruse, but then act upon it using classical conditioning methods.

And as history shows, it seems to have worked pretty damn well.

Each of these PNAC proposals were essential pieces to the overall master plan, the takeover and dissolution of the United States, the latter of which is totally contrary to their stated principles, but as many have already figured out, the inevitable outcome of this has already been deviously engineered into the deployment of their aggressive plan, in the form of blowback and retaliation from those oppressed and infuriated by the plans eventual overall execution. Perhaps most telling of all, the PNAC website (www.NewAmericanCentury.org) and the POTD website (www.PTdemocracy.org) have both been removed from the internet.

What's the old saying about having nothing to hide?

Long story short folks, if you haven't figured it out by now, this was an illegal coup on the United States of America. Period. End of discussion.

According to Michelle Ciarrocca and William D. Hartung's book, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival," World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002...

"When Zakheim left the Defense Department in 1987, it was for an executive vice president post with the Virginia-based government contractor Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), which has supplied the Defense Department with military technology such as remote controlled flight technology for several decades and has been a support contractor for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Zakheim also served as CEO at subsidiary SPC International and as a consultant for the defense contractors McDonnell Douglas (now a part of Boeing) and Northrop Grumman."

When it comes to the US neoconservative movement, there appears to be dirt from 9/11, no matter where you turn, yet, this is but only the tip of the iceberg.

Everyone gets the blame post 9/11, except for the neocons, Zionists and their US and Israeli supporters who planned it all. For added measure, these neocons were center stage on the spotlight of leftist and right leaning news agencies. They are paraded on live television as if they are saviors or idols we should look up to.

The fact that the mainstream corporate media has said virtually nothing about this infiltration of the US government by a private neoconservative group of individuals, with foreign ties to another government, that is quite telling in itself.

It tends to substantiate and corroborate allegations that the media is a disinformation and propaganda conduit of the government, supported by the ultra-wealthy powers that be.

Another point of contention is the fact that this secretive group is also a key sister organization to another covert group, the Israeli organization known as IASPS, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. (Responsible for Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.)

The two plans together, Rebuilding America's Defenses, and A Clean Break, both dovetail together as one plan, with a singular agenda and objective.

One could rightfully suggest that there may be more than just these two uncovered plans in play. There very well could conceivably be at least two more plans, covering both the EU and Asia, but they have yet to surface in the public domain.

I've said it many times over and I will keep repeating it every chance I get...

The Taliban did not create the IASPS or the PNAC.

Al Qaeda didn't draft the "Clean Break" document, nor the 1992 DPG, or the 2000 "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document.

Isis is not the one changing US law or restricting your Constitutional rights.

Our politicians did all of this to you... to all of us... and yet they themselves are but minions to the powers that be (TPTB), puppets to the uber-rich marionettes who rule this world with indifference for all but themselves.

Allegedly... these neoconservative Israel hard-liner idealists did it all so that they could perpetuate their plan for US supremacy through the "New American Century," but in all reality, it's about the demise of the US, for a one-world globalist rule.

That may be hard to accept, or even fathom for some, but one only needs to look at what's happened to the US post 9/11 as a result of their covert national policy changes.

This is why many of the internationalists see fit to turn to a multilateral economic order with the possible exclusion of the U.S.

The system at its present has been in development for more then three centuries now, its formations can be seen in action in the late 1600s in Amsterdam which was a former financial power house for Jewish bankers in the past which aided in the removal of the Roman Catholic's influence in England (King James) with William of Orange, (ref. The Glorious Revolution).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glorious_Revolution

Many people hate on the world government for their engineering of economies and people, but what these people have done has been a manufactured progression towards what they believe to be a stable, economically egalitarian redistribution whose aim is a better quality of life for people, so they say, and a state counter intuitive to the human animal because tribal feudalism is that state and its manifestations occur in things such as Financial Faux-Capitalism, where we have a short rebuff too, as to why we have democratic socialism with the plugin for capitalist markets. The New Economic World Order might look good on paper, it might even work, yet we've seen for many years its infiltration and the bad people that surround it. It could be hailed as the savior of poverty and war, the antidote in fact, or just another form of totalitarian control run by technocrats, theocrats and the Zionist Cabal.

And let us now look at what a prominent German Jewish neocon has to say about this New Order....