This is an old reddit post I made as I came about to my new worldview around very late 2018. The gist is that the only agents/forces that really matter in modern Western society - if the status quo never changes - can be divided into three groups: Leftists, Globalists, and Jews (incl. Zionists). Most people here will probably find this boring, but I’m reposting some of my submissions for posterity. I still largely believe this is an accurate and useful model. I might post a more concise, updated version later (TL;DR at the bottom)“Globohomo Gayplex” was a term I believed initially coined by TRS.
What is the GloboHomoGayplex?
Globohomo (adj) A word used to describe a globalized and homogenized culture pushed for by large companies, politicians, and Neocon/Leftist pawns. This culture includes metropolitan ideals such as diversity, homosexuality, sexual degeneracy, colorblindness in regard to race, egalitarianism, money worship, and the erasure of different individual cultures, among other things. The term is often used by Alt-Right figures, as well as other people associated to the right on the political spectrum, who are aware of the globalization being forced upon multiple countries. Also used to describe Global Capitalism and/or Marxism. The globohomo system is referred to as the Globohomo Gayplex.
The Globohomogayplex has obviously taken hold most strongly in Western nations but its main agents are trying to extend it to be truly “globo,” to best ability. The Iron Law of the Gayplex is sort of related to the “Iron law of Oligarchy”. This postulation just comes from an observation of geopolitical outcomes, and the current power structure in the West today. Firstly, there are three main groups that have any real power in our modern Western society – these are “Leftists,” “Globalists” (“capitalists”), and “Jews.” The power/goals of these groups are reinforced by a variety of mechanisms, but so long as the power structure in Western societies stays the same, The Iron Law of the GloboHomoGayplex is this:
”Any major sociopolitical outcome will ultimately serve either the interests of Leftists, Globalists, or Jews (and often all at same time) - and never none of them.”
The law is only always true for Western countries but is often true in other countries where these groups have significant influence. Supranational organizations also tend to be used as vehicles for globogay ends – like the UN or IMF. Leftists, Globalists, and Jews all have varied reasons for supporting and perpetuating the globohomogayplex (and we will cover these) and sometimes come into conflict, but usually and end up working together to achieve their goals (e.g., tech) and generally all reinforce one and other. For instance, Globalists mostly want more money and economic stability - but "economics" is a non-science often usurped by leftism, and Globalists can be ideologically motivated by leftism. Jews are often both leftists and globalists but their unique proclivities and influence mean that they are disproportionately responsible for leftism, yet simultaneously get their ethnostate Israel at the same time. Sometimes there’s something for everyone – The Disney Corporation (globalists) can make money in Hollywood (Jews) by appealing to “diversity” in Star Wars (leftism). What events appears to be a buck in the general trend turn out not to be the case when you evaluate the consequences. For instance, the Iraq War/WoT appeared to be an American conservative-led war against a foreign enemy which created/relied on a lot of tribal hatred against Muslims/middle-easterners in the US. But in the end, all these wars did was to increase "security" at the expense of freedom (globalists), benefit war the profiteers (globalists) and destabilize Israel's neighbors (Jews) – and it turns out there were no WMDs after all (surprise!). The law also helps explain why some stated sociopolitical goals that don’t otherwise make any sense or seem to be “our problem”,” like Gaddafi or the Syrian conflict (Jews/Globalists).
The law is not only explanatory and predictive, but it also renders most other political discussion largely irrelevant – at least in the prospect of real outcomes. For instance, if one argues for any policies/goals that run counter to the interests of Leftists, Globalists, or Jews that are also not in any one other group’s explicit interest, it was only for futile speculation (because they will never come to pass) - unless one also confront the nature of Globohomogayplex and its underlying power structure. Otherwise, said goal/policy is irrelevant for any practical purposes.
To further evaluate why the law is true, we should probably start with a discussion ofLeftism. This phenomenon is best described by Ted Kaczynski in his manifesto “Industrial Society and its Future”
7 But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology
218 Various thinkers have pointed out that leftism is a kind of religion. Leftism is not a religion in the strict sense because leftist doctrine does not postulate the existence of any supernatural being. But, for the leftist, leftism plays a psychological role much like that which religion plays for some people. The leftist NEEDS to believe in leftism; it plays a vital role in his psychological economy.
In isolation, many of these leftist tenets aren’t “bad” at all – but this is not where leftism ends. Every religion needs an “evil:”
15 Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
21 Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help.
And this is the biggest problem of leftism: Its foundation is not “compassion” or some other rational basis – its self-hatred and negativity stemming from leftists’ own feelings of inferiority and low self-esteem. Conservatives like to joke “[leftism] is a mental disorder” but its actually mostly true: Leftism a maladaptive psychological coping mechanism that manifests as political movement hellbent on destroying Europeans and western society.
People on the right like to ask the question “Why does Antifa/far left get away with shit, while the media gives them a break and MAGA/”nazis” are thrown in jail and demonized?” The answer to this is very simple: leftists are the shock troops of the globalist establishment - even if they pretend to fight against it to suit their psychological needs:
28 The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.
The leftists feelings of inferiority and need to hate and lash out in a LARPy fashion is why they insist we are “white supremacists” despite our tired dismissals this isn’t true. They need you to be “white supremacists” to fulfill their psychological needs and it doesn’t matter that you point out the accusation is false. This is why rational argumentation is not a very effective with leftists – the foundation of their ideology isn’t bound in rationality at all. Leftists might commit violence but since they do not pose a serious threat to globalists or Jews (unlike thier “nazi” reactionary opponents) they are given pass.
The rise of leftism and solutions to the problem are a discussion beyond the scope of this post, but I personally recommend reading “Industrial Society and its Future” at the very least (this work is also mandatory reading for high schoolers in the ethnostate, and every time you don’t read you are committing not to level-up). Leftism is just one facet of the Globohomogayplex, and what is most important to realize in this context is that leftism serves as its ideological foundation for the globalist project, and is the only (pseudo)religion in the Western world that has any real power. Its proponents – whether obese twitter feminists or the globalist establishment - use and manipulate leftism just like other religions have been used in the past. Even when leftism doesn't always serve globalist or jewish interests directly, its useful for them to appeal to it as a pseudo-religion (“diversity is our greatest strength”)
The next facet we will briefly discuss are the Chosen Ones. The JQ is a whole post – novels even – on its own, but what is most important to understand in the context of the Iron Law of the Globohomogayplex is this:
Jews are vastly overrepresented in positions of power and cultural influence
Jewish elites are far to the left of gentile elites and have moved shifted the distribution of political opinion among American elites from centrism to leftism
Jewish leftism and success can partly be explained by their mean IQs, living in large cities, personality traits, and possibly certain cultural values, but ethnocentrism also plays an important role that should not be ignored.
Anti-Semites are fond of pointing out that Jewish people control various industries or are vastly overrepresented in various positions of power. As it turns out, empirical data strongly supports these claims.
All the empirical data on the JQ is most easily accessed on Sean Last’s site “Ideas and Data”. Again, I’m not going to get into a long-winded discussion on this but here are just a few blurbs from his article that demonstrate the magnitude of influence:
In the 1988 book The Media Elite: America’s New Powerbrokers, Litcher, Rothman, and Litcher report on a representative survey of 238 journalists from America’s top new organizations which found that 59% of respondents were Jewish.
A 1990 list of the top 10 US entertainment companies published in American Film found that Jews accounted of 8 of their ten CEOs (Lynn, 2011). The companies were Time Warner, Paramount, CBS, Fox, Columbia Pictures, Viacom, ABC, and MCA Inc. Thus, claims such as “Jews run the media” are plausibly more true than untrue. When one utilizes the most elite criteria for defining members of the media, more than half seem to be Jewish.
Jews are even more present among political donors. In 2012, Jews accounted for 20% of the top 5 GOP donors and 40% of the top democrat donors. In 2016, Jews accounted for all 5 of he top Democrat donors. One analysis finds that, of the top 50 donors in 2016, Jews accounted for 40% of mega-donors in total, 25% of Republican donors, and 79% of Democrat donors.
Given your knowledge of Jews and leftism, it should be fairly obvious why “nazi kkkk white supremacists” don’t get fair (((media))) coverage. Jews very obviously have unique history and interests (like Israel) and while they do not all agree on everything (i.e., there is not a “conspiracy” amongst all Jews) they undeniability hold a hugely disproportionate degree of socioeconomic and political influence as an ethnic group. The existence of the Jewish ethnostate and the fact that the US gives it a ton of money (thanks for the chutzpah PragerU) means there is an undeniable conflict of interest for any Zionist Jews living in the US. The Jewish elite verifiably also hold very far left views and engage in political action to further these goals (e.g. George Soros’ “Open Society”), and these goals tend to be pro-Israel, leftist, and anti-white. The reasons for anti-whites sentiment are varied and include many cultural and probably genetic factors, but these and the JQ beyond the scope of this post. The point is just to recognize that Jews have a lot of power and influence and have their own agendas, hence their prominence in the Globohomogayplex. What is important to recognize is that both Jews and the pseudo-religious phenomenon of leftism have a profound impact on who can and cannot climb the social ladder, and this brings us to our last group, the Globalists.
The Globalists can be subdivided into three main subgroups, and they are A) Capitalists B) Politicians, and C) Anyone else (who supports the globalist project). In short, subgroups B&C either directly or indirectly serve the interests of subgroup A, the Capitalists, who hold the real power and are principally concerned with profit (and thus, economic stability and security) but have other selfish interests. Everyone kind of knows who these people are, our economic rulers that comprise the modern global oligarchy - the 1% the leftists even complain about. They use their money to do things and influence political outcomes, mostly to make more money. While the Capitalists are typically pretty smart, they have mortal limitations (like anyone else). Importantly these are 1) Ideological motivations (e.g. leftism, Zionism, even “western values”) 2) Myopia – a short-sightedness in the pursuit of profit or other goals at the expense of the future and 3) Imperfect information - they do not always have all the information they need to accomplish their goals. These limitations (might) explain why even Globalists with good intentions (the few) can make irrational decisions (like Economics policy) or sacrifice the future for stability and security today (insert Orwell)
Skipping group B (the politicians) for a second, the third group, C, include a wide variety of people who either directly or indirectly end up furthering the goals of the Capitalists. We can further divide these into two groups: “Direct” and “indirect” influencers. A “direct” influencer would be entities like the Cato Institute - who take mantric economic half-truths like “immigration is good for the economy” (more on this to come) and somehow misconstrue them into retarded endorsements like “open borders” intended to confuse and mislead the public to further the Globalist agenda. Other direct influencers would be people like government employees and public servants (military) who are not elected, and include other pundits like some tech CEOs. “Indirect” influencers include centrists and other types who implicitly endorse the globalist project through their actions. A good example of unwitting contributors are (typical) libertarians. They actively campaign for small government and are generally pro-immigration, but at best they only ever get immigration and ‘dude weed lmao’ - never a material reduction in the public gayplex. Such a reduction would decrease the power of Globalists and Jews and not achieve the goals of leftists, thus it violates the Iron Law and libertarians will never get it (as things stand now).
Before we discuss Group B, Politicians, lets return lets return to leftism for a second.
Since egalitarian creationism and other tenets of leftism are not based in any facts or reality, it is objectively a belief system that basically serves as religion for leftist types. It also very plain that leftism has supplanted Christianity as a “religion” in the West. It is totally acceptable to publicly criticize Christianity or Christians (like ‘Bible Belters’), and where Christianity does exist its principles have been crudely and shamelessly warped to suit leftism.. We also constantly make exceptions to our supposed values for leftism (e.g., modifying the constitution for “equal rights” amendment, “hate speech” doesn’t count as “free speech” on the internet, etc.) In contrast, speaking out against the tenets of leftism is not illegal but can be a death sentence for your career and social life. In effect, accusations of things like “racism” or “antisemitism” are more analogous to accusations of “heresy” in the modern era, and it essentially has the same effect. As stated before, the pseudo-religious phenomenon of leftism has profound impact on regulating human behavior and thus who can and cannot climb the social ladder. This has important implications for everyone, but especially for politicians in a democratic society.
We want politicians (group B) to be selfless public servants, but they are usually not. They have to balance alliances, previous promises, the wishes of their constituents (if only to get reelected), and their own motivations. It is often a complaint that politicians are “power-hungry,” “two-faced,” “corrupt,” or serve some other interests. Politics will always be a shitty game, but has been seem to be getting worse and worse over time. Even centrists like to ask the question:
“Why do our politicians suck?”
Beyond the unpreventable reasons, there is another answer for the cuckservatives and the centrists: Because your values suck, morons. Why are you surprised? You're getting exactly what you asked for – politicians who serve the interests of your Globohomogayplex
As a centrist, you agreed to believe race wasn’t real, white people don’t really exist, and that racism must be quashed - and now European societies are being destroyed by almost every force that isn’t European ethnocentrism. You were complicit in a system built on an egalitarian theocracy – a communism of human biology – that relied on a reckless use of thought policing and propaganda to enforce its falsehoods and sow self-hatred in its host participants in order to function. You were then silent as the left persecuted “racists” of any prominence with every social and political weapon they had. The effect is now that any (white) person who is ethnocentric and cares about their people or nation - “racists” – can’t even speak their mid, let alone hope to actually serve in office. Worse, (benevolent) ethnocentrists are among the best people you want serving – since they have a plausible moral and selfless reason for doing so. That’s why ethnocentrism exists – the in-group benefits from selfless altruistic devotion. Since centrists have decided ethnocentrism is illegitimate, leftism is OK, and we cant talk about race, they have in effect created a political ideological filter that selects for 1) Self-destructive, hateful zealots (leftists), 2) Power-hungry corporate sell-outs (Globalists) or 3) Traitorous Double-agents (our Greatest Allies). Politics is a shitty game, and few people are willing to subject themselves and their families to politics and go to bat for “western values” – these aren’t very gutturally or morally compelling (they also aren’t enforced, so in effect don’t really matter). The “anti-racism” shtick of leftism that has almost completely penetrated the mainstream is part of the reason why Republicans have been completely ineffective at reversing leftism or stopping non-white immigration, and only succeeded in slowing it down. Cuckservatism has otherwise been useless for our self-preservation. If you sell out your land and people for profit and “values,” don’t be surprised when you lose them. The Iron Law of the GloboHomoGayplex ensures that you will.
Well, that’s the end of my explanation. Lets see if we can apply the law to more stuff:
Trump Election: Populism wins the election, but Trump’s proposals violate the Iron Law. Trump is then made completely ineffective by the “deep state” (globalists) while his administration becomes completely zogged and Israel still gets most of what it wants (Jews). By luck we got some SC appointments but the globogays tried their very very hardest to not let us have even this
Brexit: - Populism votes to leave the EU, but this is against the interests of the globalists, the xenophilic fetishes of leftists, and not in the interests of Jews. Thus, it violates the Iron Law and Brexit is disrupted by the EU and even British politicians (who serve the globalists, not the people)
TL;DR
If you’re looking for a quick way to explain the craziness of the modern world, know the Iron Law of the Globohomogayplex:
”Any major sociopolitical outcome will ultimately serve either the interests of Leftists, Globalists, or Jews (often all at same time) - and never none of them.”
and also employ the Gayplex Razor: When you’re trying to navigate a muddled sociopolitical event, ask yourself “Which group will benefit from X? Leftists, Globalists, or Jews?” Let this question be your trusty toothbrush to cutting straight to the pozzed cornholecopia of AIDS that is the source of most of our afflictions in Western society today.
[–]weaselWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]AFutureConcern 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]CosmicChicken 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)