all 22 comments

[–]DisgustResponse 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Twitter is by far the most active hub for dissident right thought. Since the shoah'ing of all the forums I used to use, I have been forced to use it, which is frustrating because Twitter really blows as a platform.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I loathe twitter and will never use it.

[–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's good if you memorize and consistently follow a few people/groups and make a few hundred accounts for backup. You can redpill or contribute to redpilling quite a few normies using it too.

[–]Aureus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is there a way to use it without providing a phone number?

[–]Minedwe 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Use email instead. if it locks you out, just don't bother and create a new account entirely. use a VPN to change your IP if you must.

[–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

AFAIK, other than saidit, voat, ruqqus, and a few lenient reddit subs all you have are /pol/ and StormFront

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BANG for paychads

[–]bug-in-recovery 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😎😎😎

Unironically a great forum.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

[–]bug-in-recovery 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Do NOT go to eurochan!

I just visited and am pretty sure I saw CP there.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've been going there for a long time and never saw CP.

[–]bug-in-recovery 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hopefully it wasn't.

Looked very bad though.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Jordan Peterso isn't a dissident. He's a wolf in sheep's clothing.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    JordanPeterson

    This fucker collaborates with Mossad level h3h3

    https://old.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/

    Fuck you mammonist shill. Fuck you.

    NickJFuentes

    This faggot is literally Mossad what the fuck are you talking about?

    https://thedonald.win/

    half redpilled half jew shills

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You're not helping to sell your arguments. I know that Peterson is a Zionist shill as is the degenerate H3H3 who had the Metabunk shill come on his show... also that Trump loving Fuentes is another degenerate Zionist.

    But you should have laied out the links without using ad hominems and dragging the discussion down.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    But you should have laied out the links without using ad hominems and dragging the discussion down.

    Even though insults are placed low on the so called "pyramid of debate", they aren't fallacious. Insults by themselves like "NickJFuentes is a faggot" do not count as an argument but if the argument is provided, like "[Insert argument here], therefore the faggot NickJFuentes is a zionist shill", then, the argument would be totally valid. IMO, insults should be allowed on the site, provided a proper argument is given.

    ad hominems

    Where? An insult isn't an ad hominem. Saying "You are wrong because you are a faggot" would be an ad hominem but saying "[Insert argument here], therefore you're wrong, faggot" would not be fallacious.

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I agree, but insults can also discredits your argument even with a logical refutation.

    Insert argument here], therefore the faggot NickJFuentes is a zionist shill

    Yes, but you would have to provide a reasonas to why Fuentes [which he is] is a Zionist or crypto-Zionist and who he shills for.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes I would have to, but in the case of this sub, I can safely assume that nearly everyone here knows who that faggot is

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You literally are linking ZioCon fronts as freespeech safe places. It is becoming obvious to me that the PNACERS are hijacking the Nationalist cause.

    [–]marc_gee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There's white nationalist groups on facebook, search the word white there. For example peaceful white nationalist caucus and its ok to be white.

    [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    poal.co

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Glowie honeypot