Laura Towler Vs Rikki Doolan - CivNat just Embarrassed himself.

submitted by VarangianRasputin from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

ah ok i see, you dont actually have any ideas you think you will just magically gain power by being 'pro-white'. well good luck.

[–]frodo-baggins 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That will be a lot better than being pro Nazi. You don't have to be a Nazi to care about the fate of your people. I do not support the Nazis but I think we have a right to a homeland. I also think the most ideal way to achieve that is a White ethnostate. All of that is peaceful, and we can treat minorities exceptionally well with subsidies and payments to leave that territory- not ghettos and camps.

If you poll "do you think White people have a right to exist" and "do you like Nazis" among the general public, which do you think will perform better? If you're trying to gain support for the movement, which one do you want to campaign on?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

This is all just substanceless though, do you really think you're going to gain power by saying this?

What are you actually going to do in terms of economics? Culture? City planning? Health mental and physical? Education? State ideology/worldview? Who are your political enemies? Organisational strategy? etc ad infinitum. Once you get down to actually becoming serious rather than being a meme 'pro-white good, anti-white bad' without actually articulating anything concrete beyond this axiom you find that you ARE a 'nazi', otherwise you're not actually opposing the system in any meaningful manner.

I have actually seriously considered every realm of politics, organisation, society and culture. The holistic nationalism that is orientated to have a pro-social and pro-white perspective on every question is just an updated to 21st century form National Socialism, there's no 2 ways about it.

Where do you think you diverge from NS in philosophy, policy or strategy; and why do you think that your position is more popular than the NS position would be?

[–]frodo-baggins 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Is Viktor Orban a Nazi in your opinion? What about America in the 1940s and 1950s? What about Japan today?

I have far more in common with those. I would much rather hold up Hungary, Japan, and America's past as examples to aspire to. They are much better examples to aspire to in any case.

Economics: Tariffs and immigration restriction.

Culture: Pull government funding for academic institutions (or any other institutions, for that matter) that push anti-White narratives, "gender studies", and so on.

City planning: Allow people to voluntarily form communities such as Orania if they wish to do so. This right would apply for every race, not just White people. It would also be completely voluntary- nothing mandatory. Repeal AFFH and 1968 FHA.

Mental and physical health: Not much the government can do. What would you do?

Education: See culture.

State: White ethnostate, ideally. That doesn't mean no minorities, we have to treat everyone well within our borders. But we can give people subsidies to leave, and we can restrict new immigrants to White people of good character.

Political enemies: Civnats, neocons, left wingers. Multinational corporations importing cheap labor. The rootless cosmopolitan elite.

I diverge from NS:

-I don't think of Israel, or Jews as a whole, as the enemy. I don't deny the phenomenon of "fellow Whites" not being White, but many of those Jews have forsaken Israel and are openly pro-Palestine. Netanyahu is not their guy. The "rootless cosmopolitan elite" includes a disproportionate number of Jews, but many of them are also White or another race entirely.

-Everyone has rights. We should subsidize the emigration of non-Whites, including Jews, but we should not be putting them in camps, killing them, or violating their rights in any other way.

-I believe in free speech. Censorship is bad even if our side does it.

-Most importantly, I think the Holocaust, as well as the other genocides committed, happened. I also think they were terrible atrocities that should not be repeated.

Democratic socialists in America don't go around praising the Soviet Union or Cuba. Maybe a few wackos do, but the majority of them stay optical. Why shouldn't we do the same?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you're just a racist liberal, not a nationalist lol.

Orban isn't a Nazi, no. He is a neocon involved in kosher right nonsense to enslave white people that is pushed by Bannon based on Finkelstein's teachings, you're right you're just like him

[–]frodo-baggins 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Bruh youre an NS and youre using "racist" as a pejorative. Ok.

Juat because there are other bad people out there than Soros doesn't mean Soros and his foundations arent a major problem.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

no the pejorative is liberal

Juat because there are other bad people out there than Soros doesn't mean Soros and his foundations arent a major problem.

ok? where did i say this wasnt the case lmao soros should spend the rest of his life in a tiny cramped cell along with the rest of the jewish supremacist power structure

[–]frodo-baggins 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So why is Orban bad then? He targets Soros especially because Soros is especially bad.

Tbh I don't feel like listening to a 40 minute podcast. I might later but not now. I got the jist, that Finkelstein directed everyone's anger onto Soros to protect other people.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The jist is that this group Finkelstein made (everyone Bannon works with) is literally a Jewish gay op. It's just an election strategy used to get Zionists in power using varying levels of populist rhetoric depending on what they need to get elected. This dude work with Ayn Rand, Nixon, Reagan, Netanyahu, Trump, Salvini, Orban etc. All fake populists that only actually serve Jews. Trump and Roger Stone have been involved in this gayop for like 20 years too, they helped George Bush get elected.