Are Northwest Europeans psychologically capable of surviving in the modern world?

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

The Zimbabwean issue make me doubt it. These black subhumans murdered, raped and drove them away from their own lands. Yet now they offer a few meagre shekels and a sorry, and whitey comes running back to save the negro gutter trash from starvation.

The white man's, particularly Northwest Euro's greatest curse is his pathological empathy and fairness. There is no other population on earth is this tolerant and forgiving. And no, tolerance is not a virtue, you should never to tolerant to evil.

If I was these farmers, i'd go back to Zimbabwe, take the money, plough the land with salt, throw plauge rats in the wells and set fire to the crops before leaving the country with the money.

Northwest Euro empathy worked well in the past, where they lived among homogenous communities with similar celto-Germanic backgrounds. There was no mass travel and most Celto-Germans never had to deal with people from other races.

However in the modern technological age, mass travel and communication among peoples is the norm. The Western Euro still retains his ancient altruism, but this is relentlessly exploited by high and low iq jackals.

The German forgives and forgets all transgressions and the cycle starts anew once more. The NW Euro assumes that all other races hold the same conscience and honor as them and would behave according to Western norms and values.

This makes me really skeptical of their chances in the modern world, where mass travel is somewhat inevitable.

Eastern Euros/Slavs are much better off in this regard. Historically these peoples have been occupied and victimized by people of other races. They've been in contact with the other for ages and have developed more of an immunity to them. They're less altruistic, more neurotic, more tribal and more instinctive.

The Balkans suffered under the Turks, the Russians fought off the Mongols and the Khazars and the Poles fought the Mongols and Turks, though to a much lesser extent. However, the Poles like most Slavs have a strong victim narrative.

These developments have caused groups like Slavs, Chinese and Arabs to be much less merciful. The Russians exterminated and uprooted entire ethnic groups in the Caucasus and Central Asia. The Balkanites expelled or slaughtered all the Turks as the Ottoman Empire fell apart. The Chinese did equally worse things to the Japanese they caught.

Western Euros on the other hand, forgive their victimizers at every opportunity. Whether it be negro criminals, Jewish money lenders or native American trbies who broke treaties.

This could also be a function of their lack of a narrative. Western Euros lack a victim narrative. While its seen as ignoble and feminine by some, victim narratives serve as a powerful glue to bind nations together and promote ethnocentricity.

Everyone has one, Jews, blacks, slavs, Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Arabs...and this serves as a rallying cry for the tribe. It allows them form into one mass and oppose rival tribes.

Western Euros lack this. They neither have a victim narrative, nor high ethnocentricity, nor a savage nature. The future is going to be a tumble for them.

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is just antiwhite propaganda. 100% a clown world post with zero insight into north western european psychology imo.

Why do you think we have high trust societies? It's because we have extreme intolerance of liars. "Ordnung muss sein!" as you say in german.

If we were in control of our own countries, these "victim narratives" would get crushed.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Another factor that must be brought into consideration is national identity. Every country has a unique history which shapes their identity, and influences their policys. For instance, why are Germans much more open and accepting of muslim immigration than the Austrians? On the surface, this policy difference seems perplexing. Germans and Austrians are of the same race, language, and culture. So why do they diverge so sharply on this issue?

The answer lies with their historical background. Particularly with what happened during the Middle Ages. Europe was under constant threat from the Ottoman empire (a muslim Caliphate) during this period. Austria was forced to fight dozens of wars with the Ottomans in order to ensure their survival as a state. On the other hand, Germany only fought a single war with the Ottomans. Their experience during the Middle Ages was thus completely different.

Germany never lived under the constant threat of subjugation by the muslim Caliphate, as the Austrians did. Thus, they have a rosy picture of islam, one that is not grounded in reality. That is why Germans support mass immigration from the Middle East, and why Austrians do not.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is why Germans support mass immigration from the Middle East

Do they?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The white man's, particularly Northwest Euro's greatest curse is his pathological empathy and fairness.

Only a curse when hijacked by parasites. A blessing and a powerful weapon when used properly.

There is no other population on earth is this tolerant and forgiving.

Sounds like people I want to live around.

And no, tolerance is not a virtue, you should never to tolerant to evil.

When building a high trust advanced society it's absolutely a virtue. I think you're also confusing tolerance and trust. When whites live with eachother they form high trust bonds. It doesn't mean they become tolerant to evil. They only become tolerant to evil when the large institutions they built in faith and good will are hijacked by low trust nefarious people. These neferious types then use these insitutions as cover for their conditioning of the populace. An inversion of truth and beauty then occurs and you essentially have a group of white people who become slaves to evil people with evil goals like world domination, endless hedonism, etc.

If I was these farmers, i'd go back to Zimbabwe, take the money, plough the land with salt, throw plauge rats in the wells and set fire to the crops before leaving the country with the money.

Why? This compensation is better then a straight up fuck you. At least they have some capital to move to other countries and start farming operation with people who will appreciate them. Destroying innocent locals that didn't really make the decision to confiscate the land in the first place really isn't a good move. The time for these farmers to fight is over and now they must find their way to better countries. Hopefully they pick countries with lots of white people and politicians that are pro white. High finance capitalists are an incredibly powerful force and salting the land and spreading plague will just be delivered back on white people 10 fold. It's a bad move. Living your life full of endless spite and ancient grudges is a jew thing. Knowing that millions (maybe billions) will starve because the white farmers are kicked out should be enough for anyone's blood lust.

Northwest Euro empathy worked well in the past, where they lived among homogenous communities with similar celto-Germanic backgrounds. There was no mass travel and most Celto-Germans never had to deal with people from other races. However in the modern technological age, mass travel and communication among peoples is the norm. The Western Euro still retains his ancient altruism, but this is relentlessly exploited by high and low iq jackals.

Again. You immediately shut most of this exploitation off when you regain control of local and federal governments away from international capital. You seem to be framing whites as a failed project that will disappear unless they become like the low trust Jews they are currently conquered by. I reject that assertion. Our altruism, empathy, collaboration, and autistic focus on invention/building/skill development is still a strength. We just need to figure out how to coalesce around the goal of defeating the real enemy (not the fake enemies created for us to fight).

Eastern Euros/Slavs are much better off in this regard.

So do you reject your previous points then? It' looks like high trust white society can still thrive and prosper in the modern world.

They're less altruistic, more neurotic, more tribal and more instinctive.

Bullshit. This is a ridiculous claim. Eastern europeans are just as high trust and altruistic as american whites. They're whites. They haven't magically evolved some new trait. The only difference is that geo political chess board allowed eastern european countries to be spared the globo homo programming. Thanks Hitler. (no seriously all eastern european countries should thank Hitler for that). They are only based and redpilled because Germany sacrificed the flower of her youth twice in the 20th century to preserve traditional european values on the continent. The flowers of anti lgbt, anti globalism, anti central banking, anti degeneracy growing in eastern Europe were planted by the Reich and their nascent growth sheltered and watered by the blood of aryan chads.

The rest of your post is a cluster fuck and I'm not going to respond to it.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really, Slavs are different. They are genetically different and have different shape of skulls. They're not just generic ''whites''. Northwest Euros are a different race due to Catholicism and the Frankish system of Feudalism. The Slavs did not have Frankish feudalism or Catholicism. Yes they're closer to each other than non whites but they're still different.

Corruption, tribalism, crime...all are higher there. Look at maps for individualism, corruption and inequality. There is a Hajnal line that separates Western civilization from the slavosphere. Just because they have white skin and light features doesn't mean they're interchangable with Germans and anglos.

They evolved in different circumstances. And the idea that Hitler is to thank for Eastern Europe being less degenerate is nonsense. Hitler wanted the Slavs as a colonial underclass to new German overclass. He wanted a contiguous land Empire in Europe that could be autarkic. For this he wanted Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, the Baltics and Southern Russia upto the Caucasus oil fields. The Germans already began colonization of Poland with Germans by 1941.

Hitler's great fear, as well as the Kaiser's, was that the Russians would become unstoppable once they fully industrialized, due to their vast population potential and landmass. Hitler's war ended up permanently destroying the populuation potential of Eastern Europe, with Slavs being half the number they'd otherwise be without the war. The war mostly killed fertile young men in the East.

It was not Hitler's sacrifice but Stalin's victory that saved Eastern Europe. After WW2, the Jews attempted at world government by handing control of all nuclear weapons to a UN organization. This would've created the one world government right then and there. It was Stalin and Russia's refusal to go on with it and surrender their sovereignty, that saved the world.

Stalin wanted nuclear deterrence for Russia and refused world government. The US and UK elites were eager to surrfender their sovereignty to the UN. This was the origin of the cold war as the Jews balked at this. Then Stalin obtained the bomb in 1948 or 49 and immediately purged the Jews in the USSR government. In 52, there was the Slanksy trial where the Czech Jewish rulers were tortured and killed on accusation of zionism.

This was the true reason behind the cold war. The eastern bloc was spared the brainwashing because the Jews were kicked out of power by Stalin and his successors and communism prevented the degeneracy of Capitalism.

You could read Yockey on the Russians and Stalin.

[–]deAccount 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Depends on whether or not the NW Euro is living in north western Europe or in one of Europe's extensions (the Americas or Australia).

In most European extensions, the lack of nationalist parties and quick demographic replacement gives him no option to fight back. The only area that's still doing fine is South America, mostly because they still don't have those dual citizen Israeli subverters.

In NW Europe, ethnic homogeneity is present, there are nationalist parties, and there's no narrative that "your ancestors are evil murderers and slave owners" that permeates the peoples' minds.

If anything, the people most plagued with pathological altruism are the Nords. Even then, they're still not in a hopeless situation at all. That spot goes to South Africa, followed closely by the United States.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That spot goes to South Africa, followed closely by the United States.

I'd disagree. I'd say SA whites have more hope than the US. Because the blacks in the RSA are just braindead. If 4 million whites united and fought, the SA military would collapse in short order and they could take over. Its the liberal American world order that prevents something like that.

In the US however, there are 8 million Jews and they have many high IQ buttgoyim: White liberals, Asians, Indians and even more than that, the US military is simply a leviathan. Plus the brainwashing and cultural rot is far more intense in the US than anywhere on Earth. In RSA there are probably many whites who live in rural settings and are more virile and masculine

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Naive thinking. White South Africans actually did try this in the 90s, it was crushed by the South African military. Not to mention 'defeating' the army is only half the battle.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

when?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

when?

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

90s

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what event? Link?

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bophuthatswana

[–]Salos10000 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Bophuthatswana_crisis